Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

PVC Catch can system.... Final conclusive answer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #101  
TT402LS1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Strawberry Point, IA
Default

Originally Posted by JMBLOWNWS6
Yup Ryan @ A bear. $750 for the covers. No part number. I had allready come up with this idea from my buddie Danny. So we did it on my his vette which I have allready posted.
I was talking about the AL pieces that are theaded and in the breather holes. Are they pushed in a rubber grommet? Or are they part of the valve cover it self?

Thanks - Ron
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2007 | 04:53 PM
  #102  
nossty1's Avatar
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 445
Likes: 12
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Why not use 1 husky for each cover? They are cheap enough and it would just flow better.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2007 | 09:17 PM
  #103  
JAvenger007's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: ATL/Savannah Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by nossty1
Why not use 1 husky for each cover? They are cheap enough and it would just flow better.
That could work and then just run a filter off of each (or just cap the one side).

mondi2002 im confused by your setup. you have the back two ports y-ing into the PCV valve and then to a catch can? TB is plugged and where is the intake running to and front pass valve cover?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #104  
mondi2002's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: CLARENCE, NY
Default

Originally Posted by JAvenger007
That could work and then just run a filter off of each (or just cap the one side).

mondi2002 im confused by your setup. you have the back two ports y-ing into the PCV valve and then to a catch can? TB is plugged and where is the intake running to and front pass valve cover?
From what I understand the left pass. cover is a vent allowing air in.
You should not put vacuum on this, its like sucking on both ends of a straw.
Since I have a procharger, must cap off the TB port and vent the line to the ground. I am using the intake port to control my Bypass valve for the procharger. Seems that most use the brake booster line for that though. I am not sure why? I do have my boost gauge hooked up on the brake booster.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 12:29 AM
  #105  
NXSLT1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville,Tn
Default

All I'm using is a small water seperator I bought at Lowes. Comes off the valve cover into the seperator then into the suction side of the blower. It actually pulls a vacuum on the crankcase. When I shut the car off I can hear air being sucked back in the motor around the grommet on the valve cover. I've got the same thing on the pcv valve but this is a custom intake and the baffle on the underside of the intake I made for the pcv isn't working too well. Sucks alot of oil in there. Thinking about just capping it off at the pcv valve and seeing how just pulling from the valve cover does. This is a roots blower by the way with only about 6-7 lbs. but the motor has 145,000 on it.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 09:11 AM
  #106  
koji777's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Bossier City LA
Default

As with so many threads like this one.... many opinions have surfaced, many options have surfaced. Can we come to a comprehensive, cost effective.... simple solution we can put on paper... possibly a sticky and put this to bed? Once again, I am not the sharpest knife in the drawer, however I can follow a diagram and read directions. Thanks for everyones input... lets see if we can consolidate all this info and put a diagram together so everyone can have an operational cost effective system.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 12:15 PM
  #107  
NemesisC5's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by koji777
As with so many threads like this one.... many opinions have surfaced, many options have surfaced. Can we come to a comprehensive, cost effective.... simple solution we can put on paper... possibly a sticky and put this to bed? Once again, I am not the sharpest knife in the drawer, however I can follow a diagram and read directions. Thanks for everyones input... lets see if we can consolidate all this info and put a diagram together so everyone can have an operational cost effective system.

I agree, after all we are dealing with the physical world of "forced induction". There should be some configuration that almost everybody agrees would be optimal as far as the systems ability to capture oil in a boosted environment
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 12:03 PM
  #108  
koji777's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Bossier City LA
Default

Can whomever posted the diagram, modify it with any "needed" changes and repost so we have a good working system?

Thanks in advance,


Mark
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #109  
2002ws-6's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: Glendale,AZ
Default

Here's My set up. I think its clean relitively simple, and keeps the PCV system stock while not under boost. It also vents all three ports to atmosphere through a catch can while under boost. Probably only good for 500-600 rwhp. The big boys just need to vent theirs to atmosphere all day long.
1. The port on the throttle body was pluged with a 1/8 brass pipe plug.
2. The 3/8 hose on the top left of the picture connects to the front pass side valve cover port.
3. The 3/8 hose on the top right connects to the factory line that connects both rear ports. I had to cut off about 4" off the factory hard plastic line.
4. The line to the far right connects to intake maniold vacuum.
5. The line at the bottom connects to a catch can.
6. The check valve on the right only allows the intake manifold to suck
7. The lower check valve allows the system to pull crankcase gasses through the stock PCV system, while under manifold vacuum and then vent all three ports to atmosphere under boost.
Name:  DSC01241.jpg
Views: 889
Size:  12.4 KB
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 10:20 PM
  #110  
Ws6Extreme's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: Ingleside, Texas
Default

Ok... stupid question I just wanted to ask this.

Since I have the LS6 valley cover wouldn't it just be possible to connect the two valve covers in the rear, capping off the front passenger PVC port and TB port, place a METCO filter to just vent the Valve covers to atmosphere, and running a line from the intake port to a check valve to the LS6 valley cover to place a vacuum on the crankcase?

Or would this setup still cause a mess in the engine compartment, and suck oil in the intake?
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 11:13 PM
  #111  
wannasupra's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Arizona, for now
Default

Originally Posted by koji777
Guys I did a search reference catch can systems. I've seen several different opinions and meathods. I'm in the process of installing a system on my car. Is there a definitive, one way... correct way to do this? I'm a simple person... a step by step approach for me would be greatly appreciated.


I'm running a 408 with an F1R 15-20 lbs boost.



Thanks in advance,


Mark
didn't read past the first post, but just get an evacuation system from summit. it'll use the vacuum created by the exhaust (which coincidentally will pull vacuum all the time, at all speeds, all rpms) to pull blow by directly into the exhaust. there's no way in hell you'll pass smog, but it'll help the rings seal up, and it'll run great
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 05:03 AM
  #112  
SRZ's Avatar
SRZ
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 12
From: FL
Default

There should be a LSX sticky and a LTX sticky for this. So many different variations to this old beaten down topic that it is frustrating for some, esp NB's.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 02:30 PM
  #113  
JAvenger007's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: ATL/Savannah Georgia
Default

2002ws-6 where did you get those check valves from
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 02:36 PM
  #114  
2002ws-6's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: Glendale,AZ
Default

I work at a Porsche Audi dealership. They are from an Audi A4 1.8t. I think I posted the number at some point in time. They are 3/8 one side and 5/16 the other. I'm trying to find ones that 3/8 by 3/8.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 03:15 PM
  #115  
JAvenger007's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: ATL/Savannah Georgia
Default

do you know that cracking pressure? I thought I remember them being pretty pricey. I wonder if 2 of the mcmaster CVs would work just as good.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #116  
JAvenger007's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: ATL/Savannah Georgia
Default

What kind of can do you run and is that the stock PCV in the line that connect to intake?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 07:51 PM
  #117  
2002ws-6's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: Glendale,AZ
Default

cracking pressure is very very low, yes that is the stock pcv valve in place and I use a summit 1 qt catch can mounted next to my cruise control box
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 08:53 PM
  #118  
Inspector12's Avatar
TT-TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 4
From: Pearland
Default

Mine is simple.TB, intake, and valve cover ports plugged with LS6 valley cover with McMaster carr check valve part # 7775K52 to a AMW catch can and from there to the intake side of the turbo's. And a single metco breather on the passenger side valve cover. It is cheap and it works. The only definate answer is the one that works for you.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 10:38 PM
  #119  
T/A KID's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 2
Default

How many of you guys are just doing away with the entire stock PCV system all together???
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2007 | 05:10 AM
  #120  
JAvenger007's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: ATL/Savannah Georgia
Default

Basically duplicated 2002ws-6's setup and drove home with it from texas. Very little boost (5psi) but its got at least 1500 miles on it and no oil smell. Some oil already in the can, but otherwise no oil spray in the bay and seems to be venting fine. Originally I didn't put in the PCV but now its in there and should keep intake cleaner. Ill post pics of it installed later today.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 AM.