Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Acceleronics Versafueler w/ 96# Injectors question?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-2007, 04:31 PM
  #21  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
lbz34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: albuquerque NM
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

HP tuners, versa fueler, 96 lb here. Idle is fine, driveability is fine. Gas mileage is not too bad either.
Old 07-05-2007, 04:34 PM
  #22  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
JMBLOWNWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Braunfels ,Tx
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lbz34
HP tuners, versa fueler, 96 lb here. Idle is fine, driveability is fine. Gas mileage is not too bad either.
Baller
Old 07-05-2007, 04:36 PM
  #23  
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cablebandit
mine idle fine except when coolant temps are under 100 degrees...i am sure its my tune though as i am open loop/speed density. otherwise, they idle and run fine.

Table A0008 will fix that problem quickly.
Old 07-05-2007, 06:14 PM
  #24  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TAQuickness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by onfire
Table A0008 will fix that problem quickly.
That's a very handy table indeed
Old 07-05-2007, 10:15 PM
  #25  
TT-TECH Veteran
iTrader: (29)
 
Inspector12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pearland
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

JM not to say you shouln't use the box and the 96'ers, but the black car has the RC 72 or what ever they work out to be like 85 lbers with out higher FP and it has been running extreamly rich and has still made the 880 on the slipping clutch and not a Fuel injector issue limiting me to more if I need it. I don't think the APS kit is going to get you past that mark just looking at the air flow the tubo's put out and it is a simple plug and play and no chance for a box to giv eyou any kind of tunning issues although that is JMO. I am sure you will be fine either way I just like not having to wire up another electronic device in a car I have a million in already LOL!
Old 07-05-2007, 11:14 PM
  #26  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
cablebandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by onfire
Table A0008 will fix that problem quickly.
tried that a long time ago....change the min pw to even lower and added timing at idle and its MUCH better

I almost went 72 or even 83# injectors. Here was my reasoning for the 96#ers.
With 2 walbros, i will be close on my 1000rwhp goal as far as fuel pump capability. With high pressures needed to push 60# etc injectors, the flow capacity goes down in the walbros. With the 96# injectors i can run lower fuel pressures which let my walbros flow more than they would at extremely high pressures.
Old 07-05-2007, 11:29 PM
  #27  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
nitrorocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cablebandit

I almost went 72 or even 83# injectors. Here was my reasoning for the 96#ers.
With 2 walbros, i will be close on my 1000rwhp goal as far as fuel pump capability. With high pressures needed to push 60# etc injectors, the flow capacity goes down in the walbros. With the 96# injectors i can run lower fuel pressures which let my walbros flow more than they would at extremely high pressures.


I have heard that before somewhere.
Old 07-06-2007, 01:44 AM
  #28  
TT-TECH Veteran
iTrader: (29)
 
Inspector12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pearland
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cablebandit
tried that a long time ago....change the min pw to even lower and added timing at idle and its MUCH better

I almost went 72 or even 83# injectors. Here was my reasoning for the 96#ers.
With 2 walbros, i will be close on my 1000rwhp goal as far as fuel pump capability. With high pressures needed to push 60# etc injectors, the flow capacity goes down in the walbros. With the 96# injectors i can run lower fuel pressures which let my walbros flow more than they would at extremely high pressures.
Doesn't really matter as you aren't at WOT all the time so I dought you would really be pushing the pumps for a very long time etc... And I don't know what you are considering high. I run my base at around 50 and bost reference it and even if you were pushing 30 LBS that would only be 80lbs I don't think that is outragous considering I know others running in the 90-100's with Walbro's and not having any failers. But everybody does things differetly so it really depends on how you want to do it etc... I just have a good idea of what his setup is going to be like as I have talked to him a little bit and I was thinking if there isn't a real money difference then the simple solution is the largest High Impedence Injectors and not to have to wire up another device etc... Not saying it is the best or anything. He has a good fuel system and I don't think it is walbro's.
Old 07-06-2007, 07:23 AM
  #29  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
cablebandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i am not worried about pump failure....just pump flow. The more pressure they push, the less they flow. Look here at these tests:
http://www.stealth316.com/2-fuelpumpguide.htm

At 40 psi base fp...20 psi boost you are looking at about 376 lph flow from dual walbros
At 60 psi base fp...20 psi boost you are looking at about 284 lph flow from dual walbros

That is a significant difference in my mind. I am not saying this is the right/only way....just why I went the 96#/box path. Hopefully the info will be useful to some
Old 07-06-2007, 08:41 AM
  #30  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
eb02z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 2,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Slowhawk help me set mine up recently and my car idles and drives fine and it's only a 347. I had one proble which was a off idle hesitation-i did a VE tune and MAF calibration and it's gone-I'm going to swap over to a SD 2 bar setup cause the car drove around like silk with the MAF disabled. I went with the FJO driver box-the nice thing about this box is if i decide to go back to a hi-impedance injector it automaticaly knows it and goes into a saturation mode.
Old 07-06-2007, 09:15 AM
  #31  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
cablebandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i did not know FJO made a box as well. Acceleronics box will run hi impedance as well. I got the acceleronics instead of the cheaper priced AEM because it was much smaller than the aem. I dont think there is a lot to these boxes anway. SD is awesome for the turbo once you have your boosted ve map done....5 psi its tuned...8 its tuned...15.5...its tuned I went out and did 5-10psi tuning yesterday so my wife can drive it at the track. Once you get 2-3psi worth of cells done, you definitely see a pattern that will get you in the ball park for the rest of the tuning.
Old 07-06-2007, 09:20 AM
  #32  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
eb02z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 2,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The Acceleronics was my first choice but I decided to try the local boys since FJO is up here in Canada. Slowhawk was right all along-last night when I disabled the MAF I couldn't beleive how crisp the throttle response was-Don you where right again-its the way to go.
Old 07-06-2007, 09:22 AM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
1INSANEGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston TX/Worldwide
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I am using BS3 for tuning would I have any issues using these? I am currently running 60lb injectors but once I make the step up to the SX88 turbo I might consider these since I think they will hold just about anything I can throw at them.
Old 07-06-2007, 09:37 AM
  #34  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
cablebandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i "think" BS3 has a "box" built in....one of the advantages of going to BS3 I believe
Old 07-06-2007, 02:03 PM
  #35  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
 
ozws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just upgraded to 96s from 83s this afternoon (also running an Acceleronic's box) on my 402. It literally took me 5 minutes to get the idle afr dialed in @ 14.5:1, 900 rpm idle, OLSD. I was @ 16.5:1 afr on my 1st startup with the 96s. The 96s generate a little rougher idle with a 1.5 ms pulse width versus the 83s pw of 1.9-2.0 ms (both were with 40 psi fuel pressure).

For a larger than stock displacement motor (364+), I think 96s will be no problem.
Old 07-06-2007, 04:01 PM
  #36  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
cablebandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ozws6
I just upgraded to 96s from 83s this afternoon (also running an Acceleronic's box) on my 402. It literally took me 5 minutes to get the idle afr dialed in @ 14.5:1, 900 rpm idle, OLSD. I was @ 16.5:1 afr on my 1st startup with the 96s. The 96s generate a little rougher idle with a 1.5 ms pulse width versus the 83s pw of 1.9-2.0 ms (both were with 40 psi fuel pressure).

For a larger than stock displacement motor (364+), I think 96s will be no problem.
Agreed
Old 07-06-2007, 05:37 PM
  #37  
TT-TECH Veteran
iTrader: (29)
 
Inspector12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pearland
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cablebandit
i "think" BS3 has a "box" built in....one of the advantages of going to BS3 I believe
You are correct BS3 will run what ever injector you want to run that one of the things I love about it.
Old 07-06-2007, 08:48 PM
  #38  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,710
Received 1,160 Likes on 754 Posts

Default

<----BS3 + 96's + 348ci
Old 07-08-2007, 11:07 AM
  #39  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
JMBLOWNWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Braunfels ,Tx
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I allready bought it Jeff. My magnafuel 4303 will handle pretty much anything I thorw at it. I bought it for room to grow. My fuel consumption factor on my car is an animal. The 4l80 and 9 inch take the toll. If I dont like it no big deal Ill sell them to my buddy with the 88mm turbo

Last edited by JMBLOWNWS6; 07-08-2007 at 02:30 PM.
Old 07-08-2007, 05:55 PM
  #40  
TT-TECH Veteran
iTrader: (29)
 
Inspector12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pearland
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JMBLOWNWS6
I allready bought it Jeff. My magnafuel 4303 will handle pretty much anything I thorw at it. I bought it for room to grow. My fuel consumption factor on my car is an animal. The 4l80 and 9 inch take the toll. If I dont like it no big deal Ill sell them to my buddy with the 88mm turbo
Yeah I figured you did. You always buy and sell like I do if something doesn't work for what you are doing I was just giving you the info on the RC injectors as they will support well over 1k at the wheels with the correct fuel system even dual Walbros if you wanted the simplicity of not having to mess with the injector driver etc... With all the money you are spending on it you might as well go ahead and buy the BS3 LOL!


Quick Reply: Acceleronics Versafueler w/ 96# Injectors question?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 PM.