Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

GT47 ex. housing question:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2007, 08:31 AM
  #21  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I will let JZ, handle how to select the comp vs turbine map vs consumption. I don't know that part......that is where the engineering aspect begins.
Old 08-20-2007, 11:32 PM
  #22  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
stevewix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

JZ you still alive?


EDIT: NVM, i just found the consumption table. Working diligently.

AAAND after 101 it appears the consumption table has zilch to do with exhaust housing selection.

Last edited by stevewix; 08-20-2007 at 11:47 PM.
Old 08-21-2007, 07:44 AM
  #23  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,695
Received 1,141 Likes on 741 Posts

Default

Oh they make a 1.23?

There is a thread on www.TheTurboForums.com that talks about efficiency, guy compares a 76mm T4 to a 88 T6 (something like that) on a mod motor Ford. Seemed like the point was that both were equal at 20psi, but after that the bigger T6 kept making more power.

I'd love to see you actually measure backpressure. I have said to friends that I would upgrade to a bigger turbo if I was (a) racing, (b) fast, and (c) went with more cubes.
Old 08-21-2007, 08:05 AM
  #24  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (-1)
 
BoostnTBSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know its not the best way to do it but put a 2nd wastgate in there to help with exhaust PSI at full boost. and do you run the wastegate to atmosphere?
Old 08-21-2007, 10:28 AM
  #25  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
stevewix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

WG is HKS 60MM, run by an Innovative MSBC-1 Plumbed to manifold pressure. Can anyone find dyno numbers comparing the different housings?
Old 08-21-2007, 10:54 AM
  #26  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Oh they make a 1.23?

There is a thread on www.TheTurboForums.com that talks about efficiency, guy compares a 76mm T4 to a 88 T6 (something like that) on a mod motor Ford. Seemed like the point was that both were equal at 20psi, but after that the bigger T6 kept making more power.

I'd love to see you actually measure backpressure. I have said to friends that I would upgrade to a bigger turbo if I was (a) racing, (b) fast, and (c) went with more cubes.
That is a skewed comparison though. What is to say the T6 76mm wouldn't have kept making more power with a T6 housing. Its possible the flange could have been the restriction point.

Also the key is turbine map , vs A/R, vs comp map. That is an art though and you can't simply just use consumption charts etc....for that.
Old 08-21-2007, 11:39 AM
  #27  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,695
Received 1,141 Likes on 741 Posts

Default

So what are your thoughts about the GT47 + 370ci setup then?
Old 09-25-2007, 03:53 PM
  #28  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,695
Received 1,141 Likes on 741 Posts

Default

So did the original poster go to a 1.08 or a 1.23 exhaust housing?
Old 02-11-2008, 04:08 PM
  #29  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
stevewix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

needed to wake this thread up, I still haven't changed anything because I drive the car on the street a lot. Can anyone tell me how going to the 1.23 A/R housing will change my spool characteristics?
Old 02-11-2008, 04:36 PM
  #30  
TECH Enthusiast
 
LS1curious's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pictures of siad kit with Wastgate routing and parts specs. Also what type of camshaft are you running ? If I saw a gt47 make 710whp on a mustang I would be worried.

Originally Posted by stevewix
Hey guys, about a month ago I dyno'd my car on a mustang MD1750, made it to 710 rwhp @6000 rpm through an unlocked turbo 400 @ 21psi. going to 22psi made the exact same power, and literally grenaded one of the exhaust manifold gaskets (multi-layered aluminum made by percys). Maybe i'm the dumbass for running aluminum manifold gaskets, but the old gasket has a gap somewhere around .25" wide. It isn't BURNED, it's ragged and looks like it simply exploded.

Getting to the point of my post, I've never checked exh. backpressure, I'm running a gt47-88 with .96 a/r housing on a 370. Is it possible i was out of power on the dyno after 21psi because the exhaust housing is too small? I've never hooked up a pressure gauge to the exhaust side, is there a certain gauge or sensor that will take the heat?

I would be interested to know what a/r some of you out there are running on similarly sized turbochargers.
Old 04-08-2008, 08:01 PM
  #31  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
stevewix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1curious
Pictures of siad kit with Wastgate routing and parts specs. Also what type of camshaft are you running ? If I saw a gt47 make 710whp on a mustang I would be worried.
2.5" y pipe into a smooth t6 merge, 2" wastegate y-pipe coming off the 2 pipes leading to the merge. 1.625" primaries on shorty headers, cam specs 230/220 116 LSA with roughly .580 lift. Help me find my bottleneck, i'd greatly appreciate it.



Quick Reply: GT47 ex. housing question:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.