Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Roller rockers and turbos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 28, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #1  
Karpellarpy's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, South Carolina
Default Roller rockers and turbos

hey guys, can we discuss how the addition of roller rockers to a turbo setup effects things? It seems for the most part, roller rockers end up being so we can spin the motor harder ... but what about the quicker ramp rate due to the roller, the possible addition of false knock, and the added lift. The increase in hp due to roller rockers is documented for n/a setups, but what about boost setups? Should roller rockers be added purely for high rpm safety reasons, and let a cam take care of increasing the performance? how should a turbo cam be tweaked to take into account the addition of roller rockers? etc...
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007 | 06:07 PM
  #2  
DeltaT's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 1
Default

If you assume that you stay with the same ratio roller rockers as what you are replacing, then really the only gains are due to lowered friction to move them as opposed to a ball/stud rocker or a non-roller shaft mount.

Changing the ratio applies to all rockers, pretty much equally, except as noted above in friction.

The additional mechanical noise that could lead to false knock is a problem in any motor, knock sensor and/or knock sensor module not designed for roller rockers. But I don't hear too much about this problem unless it's with the addition of a solid roller cam and lifters.

Your turbo cam doesn't need tweaking if you add roller rockers of the same ratio. If you switch ratios, you need to ensure the springs and valvetrain can handle it, and perhaps check the valve-to-piston clearance.

Jim
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007 | 06:33 PM
  #3  
qqwqeqwrqwqtq's Avatar
FormerVendor
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 2
From: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Default

Fwiw we always use stock rocker arms in our turbo builds. Even our shop car that makes 1140rwhp and turns to 7,800rpm.

Any time we've tried using an aftermarket roller rocker or shaft rocker a signifigant loss in rpm capability occured.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #4  
98turbls1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 2
From: Central Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by INTMD8
Fwiw we always use stock rocker arms in our turbo builds. Even our shop car that makes 1140rwhp and turns to 7,800rpm.

Any time we've tried using an aftermarket roller rocker or shaft rocker a signifigant loss in rpm capability occured.
Have you tried this with both aftermarket rocker studed rollers and aftermarket shaft styles (Jesel, T&D)?? I would think that you would probably lose more with the regular style stud rockers (comp cams, scorpion) simply becuase the shaft style (stock or aftermarket) act as a girdle to tie them in together...
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007 | 11:17 PM
  #5  
BadgeZ28's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 811
Likes: 2
From: Oregon
Default

my setup is essentially a modest street car with only 5 psi of boost. Adding Comp cams pro magnums and their hardened pushrods made the motor rev quicker. In other words, I notice a significant different in how much easier the motor gains rpm. I don't go past 6K, so can't comment on how they affect high rpm.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 11:17 PM
  #6  
Karpellarpy's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, South Carolina
Default

well, doesn't the size of the roller on the tip effect the rocker ratio. I read something about this the other day when reading about crane cam's quick lift roller rockers. They're still rated at a 1.7 ratio, but they apparently hold this ratio through the entire arc of the rocker whereas stock starts and ends at 1.54 ratio or something, and only peaks at 1.7. It would seem that getting the valve open quicker would be great for boost. Also, with less friction, why would the roller rocker reduce how hard you could spin the motor as mentioned above?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 01:12 AM
  #7  
LSInnovations's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Default

Comp pro magnums have caused valve float and annoying valve adjustment ...so i no longer use them in builds..

The only recommendation for most standard builds is YT ultra-light shaft non-adjustables...or stockers with the HS inner upgrade.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 06:23 PM
  #8  
Karpellarpy's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, South Carolina
Default

ok, and any documented gains using the yt's or the hs inner upgrade on boosted builds?
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 07:52 PM
  #9  
ls1king000's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 889
Likes: 2
From: addison, IL
Default

psj was using the YT rockers and he was having minute problems, went back to the stockers. problem solved
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 10:28 PM
  #10  
LSInnovations's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Default

Was that the old school YT's or the new ultra-light shafts?? Ive seen no issues in dozens of new YT setups
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 05:29 AM
  #11  
2MuchRiceMakesMeSick's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,157
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Default

well I was looking at the new style YT but i guess ill save my money
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 07:13 AM
  #12  
nesikachad's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Default

I just bought a set of the Jesel Sportsman Series shaft mounts.

No adjustments in these. Just bolt and go. (provided PR length is correct) Anyone have any experience or heard anything about them?
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #13  
stevieturbo's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
Default

I tried to bolt a set to my Edelbrock heads.....

If they are anything to go by, dont expect an easy job. Mine still arent on.

Whether this is due to my head/valve setup, or the fact they dont bolt straight on, I dont know.
And the valve covers will need some work to clear them too.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 12:56 PM
  #14  
nesikachad's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Default

It does mention this in the instructions.

I bought taller valve covers and am hoping that since the heads are just worked over OEM LS1 heads, they'll drop in without requiring machine work. If they do, I'll just fixture to a mill and clearance myself.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 01:56 PM
  #15  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
LS1Tech Co-Founder
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 45,326
Likes: 1,767
From: Chicago, IL
Default

I have seen Mike Brown post about using H/S non-adjustables, but I know a lot of fast turbo guys and if they are hydraulic they are typically running stock rockers.

I had Speed Inc. pull off a set of older YT's off my car, car was not rpm'ing and it seemed to be a valvetrain issue because the springs that were on the car at the time were set up at same spring pressure that most folks run and the springs were not old either.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 03:03 PM
  #16  
stevieturbo's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
Default

Originally Posted by nesikachad
It does mention this in the instructions.

I bought taller valve covers and am hoping that since the heads are just worked over OEM LS1 heads, they'll drop in without requiring machine work. If they do, I'll just fixture to a mill and clearance myself.
For reference....

Bolting straight to the head....the rocker arms fouled my spring retainers. I think stock style tapered retainers would work fine though.
Mine are parallel dual springs, with a flat retainer.

Then after I clearanced the rockers ( no doubt a bad idea...but I was keen to fit these ), PR length would have ended up at 7.150" to give me 50thou preload.
Yes, these are unmilled heads, and OE deck on the block with GM MLS gaskets. With the current YT's Im on 7.325" PR's which is prob about 60-80thou preload.

So either the rocker platform on my heads is too low, the installed valve heights too long/high, my heads rocker setup is nothing like stock....or Im just very unlucky. Or maybe all of these.

Clearancing the valve covers was the easiest bit !!! At least I could easily see when that was done.

I dont believe the spring platform is wrong, because if I shim this up to the point where the rockers did clear the retainers, it looked like a pushrod would just pop out of the rocker at full lift.


Needless to say I f**king hate LSx valvetrain at the minute !!!!!
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 03:50 PM
  #17  
nesikachad's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Default

You using YT or Jesel?

Man, cutting on the rocker arms must have been a tough call. I couldn't do it. I'd have to shim the rocker stands or something. Anything!

My plan is to mock it up, and then adjust either height or PR length.

My short block is all OEM. Heads are CNC ported LS1's from Lingenfelter. Bigger vavles and Comp 921 springs w/titanium retainers.

Good luck on your dilema.

When I get home here in 9 days the fun starts. I'll have a long *** build thread with lots of pictures.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2007 | 01:05 AM
  #18  
67Firebird455's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 12
From: Visalia, California
Default

Only reason I'm putting harland sharps on my 408... Don't want the possibility of needle bearings in the pan. Just for peace of mind I guess...
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2007 | 12:33 PM
  #19  
stevieturbo's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
Default

Originally Posted by nesikachad
You using YT or Jesel?

Man, cutting on the rocker arms must have been a tough call. I couldn't do it. I'd have to shim the rocker stands or something. Anything!

My plan is to mock it up, and then adjust either height or PR length.

My short block is all OEM. Heads are CNC ported LS1's from Lingenfelter. Bigger vavles and Comp 921 springs w/titanium retainers.

Good luck on your dilema.

When I get home here in 9 days the fun starts. I'll have a long *** build thread with lots of pictures.

Thanks.
Using YT's, but wanted to use these Jesels I bought months ago.

Its a shaft mount setup. If this was shimmed up, as I said, I would be certain a pushrod would pop put of the rocker when the engine is running.
You can only go so far with the installed height of the rockers before getting into trouble. So that was not an option.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 01:30 AM
  #20  
rjw's Avatar
rjw
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 387
Likes: 1
From: Tinker till it blows, then back it off a notch, maybe!!
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Using YT's, but wanted to use these Jesels I bought months ago.

Its a shaft mount setup. If this was shimmed up, as I said, I would be certain a pushrod would pop put of the rocker when the engine is running.
You can only go so far with the installed height of the rockers before getting into trouble. So that was not an option.
Sounds like something is not right with those heads, especially with the other problems that you've been having.

Just a thought......
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE