Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Why not use variable nozzle turbos on rear mount STS kits?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2008, 01:42 AM
  #21  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

please keep us all posted on how it goes! even if a second gate is needed to keep boost in check it still going to be a monster setup!

do you think there would be any problems with smaller turbos? say a T88? just thinking that a 88 would sppol pretty quick and still be able to deliver over 1000bhp!

ok so being serious, what are the downsides to the style of setup? if you need two gates then cost will go up a little. then there is getting the twin scroll housings on the bigger turbos. also what kind of AR would you be looking for on a LS1? do you want a 1.XX or one of the smaller ones??

Could this really be having yuor cake and eating it????

Chris.
Old 10-13-2008, 06:53 AM
  #22  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Bttt
Old 10-13-2008, 06:52 PM
  #23  
Teching In
 
Scubanme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stingray, great idea you have there....I need to look at this from every angle and think about it. Its great you see somebody who likes to put their thoughts into action. GREAT JOB.
Old 10-13-2008, 09:35 PM
  #24  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
mike13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lake Tapps, WA
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The newer turbos are so much more efficient and able to make big power and still have great spool up. The wheels, housing and ball bearing make running larger turbos much more civil.
Old 10-14-2008, 01:51 AM
  #25  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

you are right mike. but as other have proven (Zombie) there is only so far you can go before you encounter problems.
Old 11-25-2008, 01:36 AM
  #26  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

StingrayCray, any news on your setup???

Chris.
Old 11-25-2008, 09:21 AM
  #27  
Grr
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Grr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fargo ND
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have done what stingray guy did and it was awesome. First thing i tries was just bolting a plate in there to block one side. This resulted in at least double the compressor speed at idle on a large frame BW S400. I did plumb it in with my 60mm gate once like pictured and tried it, managed to get 10-12psi by around 3000, instead of the 3800-4k normally. I wound up not using it though as the car was completely uncontrollable and made over 700lb-ft when boost hit. I plan on doing a VERY large turbo on the LTx in the future, probably a S91 using this method.
Old 11-25-2008, 10:29 AM
  #28  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
lcvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have had this idea in my head for a while but I want to try and make a better flowing design using a Butterfly type valve and an internal wastegate actuator. it would be alot more streamlined but will require a valve plate that can withstand extrame temperatures and sealing the shaft where it penetrates the housing will be something I haven't quite figured out since any type of runner seals will be a moot point.. was thinking maybe something similar to the seal/piston setup in a turbocharger itself may work.

very cool idea!! something to get the best performance available from using a free flowing and super efficient sized turbo without having to push boost threshold into the 5500RPM range!

Chris
Old 11-26-2008, 01:54 AM
  #29  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Grr
I have done what stingray guy did and it was awesome. First thing i tries was just bolting a plate in there to block one side. This resulted in at least double the compressor speed at idle on a large frame BW S400. I did plumb it in with my 60mm gate once like pictured and tried it, managed to get 10-12psi by around 3000, instead of the 3800-4k normally. I wound up not using it though as the car was completely uncontrollable and made over 700lb-ft when boost hit. I plan on doing a VERY large turbo on the LTx in the future, probably a S91 using this method.
Have you got any graphs or data logs?? be intresting to see the power delivery. did yuo set the gate to open at full boost or lower??

got any pics of the setup??

Chris.
Old 11-26-2008, 09:45 AM
  #30  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
PunkerPontiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm pretty sure that the whole point of the 2 inlets on the turbo is to feed two different points on the turbine so you get exhaust pushing it in 2 spots rather than 1 which speeds up spooling. If you close 1 of those off I think your going to get a restriction more than anything. I'd run your setup without blocking that 2nd port at all and see what your results are first.
Old 11-26-2008, 10:55 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
1989k1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ravenna, MI
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Grr
I wound up not using it though as the car was completely uncontrollable and made over 700lb-ft when boost hit.


I still dont completely get how that setup works but it sounds like a cool idea. lol
Old 11-26-2008, 09:12 PM
  #32  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
black98ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: louisville,ky
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

My understanding is the twin scroll turbos are completely seperate down to the wheel. Having all the exhaust pass by half the area would result in much quicker spool. Then when the turbo is spooled you open the second side. This spreads the exhaust across both scrolls and reduces backpressure. Right/wrong?
Old 11-26-2008, 09:44 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
lt170chevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: BS,TX
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

thats it man..also this is an ingenious idea...man i ish my big turbo was a twin scroll..i would so do this...instant boost is the shiznit
Old 11-27-2008, 01:46 AM
  #34  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lt170chevelle
thats it man..also this is an ingenious idea...man i ish my big turbo was a twin scroll..i would so do this...instant boost is the shiznit
can you not get a twin scroll housing for the unit?? Garrett do them for all their turbos i think. do turbonrtics not do TS housings???

Chris.
Old 11-27-2008, 12:59 PM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
1989k1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ravenna, MI
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by black98ws6ta
My understanding is the twin scroll turbos are completely seperate down to the wheel. Having all the exhaust pass by half the area would result in much quicker spool. Then when the turbo is spooled you open the second side. This spreads the exhaust across both scrolls and reduces backpressure. Right/wrong?
Yea I finally caught on last night, Hellbents10 had to explain it to me. haha
Old 12-11-2008, 02:11 AM
  #36  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

anymore updates on this???

Chris.
Old 12-13-2008, 03:08 PM
  #37  
Teching In
 
ghost port's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default evil twin scroll

another for those interested



I like the simplicity of stringraycrazy's
Old 12-13-2008, 04:08 PM
  #38  
Teching In
 
KB240LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why not do a real Twin Scroll setup? Instead of the Headers merging together into the turbo flange, have each header going to each side of the Twin Scroll flange. Match it with a large 1.0x TS Housing and you should get quicker spool, more tq, and more topend. Thats how alot of Imports get high tq/hp and fast spooling setups making for pretty wicked street cars. They split the Primary and Secondary cylinders to the TS Flanges. Ex, Cylinders 1+4 and 2+3. You can do this same thing with a Twin Turbo setup on the V8.
Old 12-15-2008, 02:15 AM
  #39  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KB240LS1
Why not do a real Twin Scroll setup? Instead of the Headers merging together into the turbo flange, have each header going to each side of the Twin Scroll flange. Match it with a large 1.0x TS Housing and you should get quicker spool, more tq, and more topend. Thats how alot of Imports get high tq/hp and fast spooling setups making for pretty wicked street cars. They split the Primary and Secondary cylinders to the TS Flanges. Ex, Cylinders 1+4 and 2+3. You can do this same thing with a Twin Turbo setup on the V8.
becuase a true Twin scroll wont spool the turbo as fast as this idea!

Chris.
Old 12-15-2008, 02:18 AM
  #40  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ghost port
another for those interested



I like the simplicity of stringraycrazy's
goast, have you got any more infor or a link for this bit of kit?? it looks like it could make the install much more compact....

Chris.


Quick Reply: Why not use variable nozzle turbos on rear mount STS kits?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 AM.