Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Track results TC 78

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2008, 09:00 PM
  #21  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by code4
I am not a rear mount, sorry if I made it sound that way. Here is my set up.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....4&postcount=15
oops, thought you were a rear mount. Still duplicated the 2.75 gear results
Old 09-28-2008, 09:57 PM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
 
2 SSlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Troy, MO
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Very cool. That's damn near identical to the set-up I'm working on. If I can get anywhere near that MPH out of my 6-speed, 3.50 gear set-up I'll be VERY satisfied. 135mph should make a damn good street car.

What CI engine do have in your car?

Last edited by 2 SSlow; 09-29-2008 at 08:36 AM.
Old 09-28-2008, 10:37 PM
  #23  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
code4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2 SSlow
Very cool. That's damn near identical to the set-up I'm setting up. If I can get anywhere near that MPH out of my 6-speed, 3.50 gear set-up I'll be VERY satisfied. 135mph should make a damn good street car.

What CI engine do have in your car?
347 ci
Old 09-29-2008, 02:07 AM
  #24  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
venom ws7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: EARTH
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

So your not happy about the ET???


CONGRATS You have a 9sec street car in your hands once you fix all the bugs.
Old 09-29-2008, 02:49 AM
  #25  
Banned
 
bluecamaroz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not bad, not bad at all 136MPH and good R/T.
Old 09-29-2008, 09:32 AM
  #26  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
sciff5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

These are good results but when I think about it at 14-15psi shouldent you be making a good 700+whp at least?

I would think 700whp would be good for a little better trap speeds.

Of the few cars running the TC setups (that have posted numbers/results) the ETs are all in the 10s and traps in the high 130 range. Not that this isnt great and all but I would think you should be able to get better results out of a turbo thats capable of whats probably 900whp. With that amount of power shouldent cars be knocking on the door of 8s at 145mph?

This is an honest question..which I'm asking only because I'm interested in getting a TC series turbo for my own setup.
Old 09-29-2008, 09:39 AM
  #27  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,691
Received 1,137 Likes on 740 Posts

Default

sciff I went 9.40@143 1.35 with my old blower setup at 680rwhp a few years ago, around 3400 raceweight.

I think 10.1/10.2@136-139 is strong and is probably around 650-700rwhp.

Getting it to run a little quicker and faster might just require a little more seat time, but in all reality it might force him to make changes he doesn't want to make.

Car have a roll bar in it?

I went 10.05@137.7 1.51 last weekend on 16 psi, if I worked on getting the past pass at this boost level it would easily go 9.8@140 on a 1.4x and with more seat time. I'll probably try it anyway.
Old 09-29-2008, 09:44 AM
  #28  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
SPRAYED 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northwest side of Chicago
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Im hoping for a 10.5 with my tc78 in my 3800lb T/A. My mph has always been really low with my setup. I was only doing 122mph running a 10.8 with my pte67. I could not even imagine running even 130mph.
Old 09-29-2008, 09:47 AM
  #29  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,691
Received 1,137 Likes on 740 Posts

Default

Alex, I think you need to play with how you stage the car and stuff. Remember when we were messing around on the highway? My GT47-88 is laggy at lower rpms, but once it was in the power band it was move. That was 16 psi, and that's the same combo that I went 10.05@137.7 at GLD.
Old 09-29-2008, 09:55 AM
  #30  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
SPRAYED 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northwest side of Chicago
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

John,
I just reinstalled my new trans and i went with a vig 3600 instead of my old 3000 stall. So im hoping that will help my launch. Its going on the dyno this saturday to retune for the new stall. I would hope it could do 600whp lock on a mustang dyno which should be good for 130mph. I just dont see it happening for some reason.

Alex
Old 09-29-2008, 10:07 AM
  #31  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,691
Received 1,137 Likes on 740 Posts

Default

Have to see. A Vig 3600 can be pretty loose, let's see what it does at the track. Worst case it leaves hard but drives through the converter on the big end.
Old 09-29-2008, 10:10 AM
  #32  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
SPRAYED 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northwest side of Chicago
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I also upgraded to a 3disc so if its blowing through i can try locking it up in 3rd.

Sorry to highjack.
Old 09-29-2008, 10:11 AM
  #33  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sciff5
These are good results but when I think about it at 14-15psi shouldent you be making a good 700+whp at least?

I would think 700whp would be good for a little better trap speeds.

Of the few cars running the TC setups (that have posted numbers/results) the ETs are all in the 10s and traps in the high 130 range. Not that this isnt great and all but I would think you should be able to get better results out of a turbo thats capable of whats probably 900whp. With that amount of power shouldent cars be knocking on the door of 8s at 145mph?

This is an honest question..which I'm asking only because I'm interested in getting a TC series turbo for my own setup.

A full weight street car and he ran 139mph.....that's 700rwhp maybe a touch more. Seat time is the major difference........ask Josh @ KYTP. His old car with some seat time and a TC76 went pretty dang fast. The first few passes were only mid-10 passes. The car dipped into the 9's@ over 140 I believe.
Old 09-29-2008, 10:14 AM
  #34  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Nice numbers on the little TC.
Old 09-29-2008, 10:30 AM
  #35  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
code4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sciff5
These are good results but when I think about it at 14-15psi shouldent you be making a good 700+whp at least?

I would think 700whp would be good for a little better trap speeds.

Of the few cars running the TC setups (that have posted numbers/results) the ETs are all in the 10s and traps in the high 130 range. Not that this isnt great and all but I would think you should be able to get better results out of a turbo thats capable of whats probably 900whp. With that amount of power shouldent cars be knocking on the door of 8s at 145mph?

This is an honest question..which I'm asking only because I'm interested in getting a TC series turbo for my own setup.

It did 6.1 in the 1/8 but third gear was cutting out. Like it was too rich but the WB was reading ok. I am wondering if my WB is going out IDK.

The problem is I don't live anywhere near a track so any tuning is done on the street. I will not tune at 130 plus on the street. I will try to go back next year & figure things out & see if it will dip into the 9's.
Old 09-29-2008, 10:50 AM
  #36  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
fenix999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Maybe the load that you're getting at the track is sooo much that it is changing the way your car is driving. The load that you get on the street as opposed to a nicely prepped track can affect the way the car runs, but you obviously already know that Awesome numbers by the way man, keep it up! You have high 9's and 140mph in you, i know it!!!
Old 09-29-2008, 03:37 PM
  #37  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
bad2000z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vestal NY
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bad ***! I want a turbo setup soo bad.
Old 09-29-2008, 04:42 PM
  #38  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
sciff5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Btw when are you hitting full spool?

I know it will be different for me beause I'm going with a T56 but I'm just curious cause I'de be running truck manifolds too
Old 09-29-2008, 07:04 PM
  #39  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
frcefed98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Man those times are great looks like i'll be upgrading my lil TC76 to 78 status after seeing this run. A/F good, and still nosing over.....could be pulling some timing. Did you log your pass with HPT or EFIlive?

J
Old 09-29-2008, 07:29 PM
  #40  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
code4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yes I did, no KR everything looked pretty good. It felt identical to a way rich condition. My car will start to sputter at around 10.7 to 1.

I ran some leaded fuel for this weekend & I am wondering if my WB is off.


Quick Reply: Track results TC 78



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.