Fueling & Injection Fuel Pumps | Injectors | Rails | Regulators | Tanks

Downside of bumping pressure via FPR?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2009, 10:07 AM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Downside of bumping pressure via FPR?

Quick background on my fuel system real quick. Twin walbros in tank, stock feed, boost reference Aeromotive FPR, FAST rails, 95lb/hr Precision Turbo low impedance injectors, acceleronics driver box, -6AN braided return.

I'm pretty sure I'm maxing out the stock feed line, injectors are at 97% duty cycle, but A/F is solid, doesn't go lean and responds to fuel addition/subtraction as it should, also, when I switched from the 75's (after I found out they were 115% at 5300 RPM) the A/F didn't move at all, so in my mind that is telling me that the tuning is on. The shop has ordered me an -8AN line and fittings to upgrade the feed. I'm hoping that will lower my duty cycle because I don't see how I'm maxing 95's out, but the car does have a lot of drivetrain loss so it may have more power at the flywheel then I'm taking into account.

My question is, what is the downside of bumping fuel pressure via the regulator from say 43, to 50psi? Is there a downside, assuming the pumps can keep up? In short, I don't want to band aid a problem, if I need new injectors I need them and I'll get them, just checking out the options. Thoughts, opinions, and objections welcome. Thanks guys!
Old 10-20-2009, 11:23 AM
  #2  
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Walbro's start to struggle around 75psi on their flow curve. If you're boost referenced at 1:1 I would keep 75 as a max and bump your base fp up to get there. example...if your running 20psi boost max 75-20 = 55 max base pressure.
Old 10-20-2009, 11:24 AM
  #3  
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

PS: I would be surprised if the stock line is a problem...at these pressure levels...the stock line can flow enough fuel for 1000rwhp and has done it over and over....never hurts to upgrade it though....
Old 10-20-2009, 01:58 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Hmm, interesting info on the line. I've ran a few calculations and from what I can see, 1000HP at the crank I'd need a 93.75lb/hr injector at 80% duty cycle. I'd be surprised if the motor is over 1000 or really that close to it. What do you think?
Old 10-21-2009, 08:59 AM
  #5  
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 'Trust'
Hmm, interesting info on the line. I've ran a few calculations and from what I can see, 1000HP at the crank I'd need a 93.75lb/hr injector at 80% duty cycle. I'd be surprised if the motor is over 1000 or really that close to it. What do you think?
Lingenfelter, Speed Inc, etc have made 1000rwhp with the stock lines.

What's you AF ratio? That plays a big part. What kind of mph does it run? How much boost and what system?
Old 10-21-2009, 03:55 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I've heard about Speed Inc. making good power on the stock line, but theoretically could you not add more injector than you would need with a suitable feed to make up for lack of line?

AF is 11.8-11.9 at the tail pipe, 11.5 on the scanner. MPH isn't going to be much help, 130-134 with the converter slipping. 19.5 psi, D1-SC ProCharger kit.
Old 10-21-2009, 04:02 PM
  #7  
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

"95lb/hr Precision Turbo low impedance injectors"...who is the manufacturer? Confirm the manu number on the injector to be sure they are 95's...

D1 should not max a true 95.

A larger than needed injector can mast an insufficient line or pumps with a proper tune.
Old 10-21-2009, 04:15 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Turbo LS1 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i actually lowered my base to 45... the pumps flow better with a little less pressure. then im boost referenced, obviously
Old 10-21-2009, 07:31 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by onfire
"95lb/hr Precision Turbo low impedance injectors"...who is the manufacturer? Confirm the manu number on the injector to be sure they are 95's...

D1 should not max a true 95.

A larger than needed injector can mast an insufficient line or pumps with a proper tune.
They are true 95's, Precision Turbo manufactures them, and flow tested locally. I had 75lb's on there before and they were at 115% duty cycle (22 ms of pulse width) at 5300 RPM. These are at 17 ms of pulse width at 6500 RPM which is putting them right at 97% duty cycle. I don't think it is injector, or rail, both are pretty sufficient. I wonder if the filter can keep up?

Idle PSI on the reg is 45psi.
Old 10-21-2009, 10:16 PM
  #10  
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Did you flow test them or Precision? At what pressure were they tested?

Only a few companies actually manufacture injectors....a lot of companies rebrand them as their own...nothing wrong with that at all...just good to know a 95lb "Brand x" injector is rated at 43psi.....not 58psi....

Bosch, Standard, Siemens, and a few others.
Old 10-21-2009, 10:20 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
Twotonefreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southeast of Disorder
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I believe he had them flow tested locally.
Old 10-21-2009, 10:32 PM
  #12  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by onfire
Did you flow test them or Precision? At what pressure were they tested?

Only a few companies actually manufacture injectors....a lot of companies rebrand them as their own...nothing wrong with that at all...just good to know a 95lb "Brand x" injector is rated at 43psi.....not 58psi....

Bosch, Standard, Siemens, and a few others.
I'll see if I can find the original manufacturer, flow matched and tested by Precision, and flow tested locally again at 43.5psi. Hope that helps!
Old 10-22-2009, 01:34 AM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
blakss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago Il
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

might wanna check this out


https://ls1tech.com/forums/fueling-i...ap-return.html
Old 10-22-2009, 07:14 PM
  #14  
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 'Trust'
I'll see if I can find the original manufacturer, flow matched and tested by Precision, and flow tested locally again at 43.5psi. Hope that helps!
If they flowed 95 at 43.5 they are fine. You have a supply problem. Since you're going to do the feedline anyway, that's a start....I'd question the pumps myself. Does the fuel pressure rise at a steady rate when under boost? You should be seeing 65ish psi at max boost.
Old 10-24-2009, 05:17 AM
  #15  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
cablebandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

stock feed line...3960#...145-147 mph...96 injectors as well...no probs...dual walbros and stock filter from advance auto




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.