Are your injectors REALLY maxed out???
When using 1 injector per cylinder, my ECU wont even allow me to enter numbers on the map higher than 20ms at 6000rpm, and dropping lower as the rpms rise, and naturally time to inject fuel decreases.
I am not currently firing my injectors sequentially. Some ecu's may falsely report higher duty cycles for some strange reason. Ive seen a few do it, but it is false.
I would say the only way to know for sure, is to stick a scope onto the injector output. Id be confident that at 20ms at 6000rpm, it would be flatlined open all the time.
Now running a power adder, sure, overkill on the fuel system is JUST RIGHT! I've always been an advocate of that. But running NA, you're not going to be running a nice 13:1 fuel/air at 450 RWHP and then all of a sudden an injector stops flowing and you melt a piston. It just doesn't happen...well, anything is possible, but you get my point.
Regarding fuel pressure. Sometimes people *think* their injectors are maxed out because their duty cycle is maxed. Well, if the fuel pressure is 45 psi, you have to increase the duty cycle to maintain the fuel/air ratio. If you bring the psi back to 55+, where it should be, you can bring the duty cycle back down. Were the injectors maxed? Maybe so. Was it the fault of the injectors? No, the fuel pressure was low. How many people running serious power have a pillar mounted FP gage? Not many...but everyone running a PA should have one and it's a really good idea for anyone.
Since we're on the subject, who has had an NA LS1 engine failure due to an injector failing due to being run at a high duty cycle (injectors can fail for other reasons)? I'm sure it's happened before but in my years, I've NEVER heard of it. Not even with all of the 470-520 RWHP large CI engines running around with stock injectors. Why? Because when people notice their O2 readings are lean, they upgrade their injectors and pump. The ones who've not reached the point of leaning the mixture back excessively (even if their injectors are doing all they can) seem to run like this indefinitely and without problem.
So all cylinders may not be getting equal amounts of fuel and you would not be aware of it.
That said, Ive run injectors on plenty of cars to 95% and left them at that and never experienced any problems.
When using 1 injector per cylinder, my ECU wont even allow me to enter numbers on the map higher than 20ms at 6000rpm, and dropping lower as the rpms rise, and naturally time to inject fuel decreases.
I am not currently firing my injectors sequentially. Some ecu's may falsely report higher duty cycles for some strange reason. Ive seen a few do it, but it is false.
I would say the only way to know for sure, is to stick a scope onto the injector output. Id be confident that at 20ms at 6000rpm, it would be flatlined open all the time.
6000 rpm
sequential injection - 1 pulse per engine cycle - 4 stroke cycle
You have 2 crank revolutions per cycle, so...
3000 engine cycles per minute / 60 seconds per minute = 50 cycles per second
That gives 1 engine cycle equal to 20 msec. (1 sec / 50 cycles)
The period or repetition rate is 20 msec.
Your total available injection time at 6000 RPM is 20 msec.
If you are commanding a 20 msec pulse width, you are at 100% duty cycle.
So all cylinders may not be getting equal amounts of fuel and you would not be aware of it.
That said, Ive run injectors on plenty of cars to 95% and left them at that and never experienced any problems.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
But generally with sequential you time "end of injection" as your target. Whether that's against open or closed valve will come down to testing, some people have different views.







