dot com... AN FITTING DIRECT ????
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: San Diego/ from the 316
dot com... AN FITTING DIRECT ???? 
any one use them? they say that their lines are chemically the same as TEFLON lines
the lines and fittings look good and cheap...... almost too cheap...
i know i will get the you get what you pay for from some people
but there are also places that make to much of our hard earned cash because they dont have " the name brand" competition...
input please!!!!
Not sure what "chemically the same" means. Either they are Teflon or they are not.
Their rating is not as high as other teflon lines so it may be thinner or weaker.
The hose I use is rated for approx 3000psi, so I would assume there is a significant difference somewhere.
I can tell you that the correct PTFE (teflon) hose for fuel is not white, it is carbon impregnated black. The conductive black line is the only proper fuel rated hose. Use others at your own risk.
Their rating is not as high as other teflon lines so it may be thinner or weaker.
The hose I use is rated for approx 3000psi, so I would assume there is a significant difference somewhere.
I can tell you that the correct PTFE (teflon) hose for fuel is not white, it is carbon impregnated black. The conductive black line is the only proper fuel rated hose. Use others at your own risk.
Not sure what "chemically the same" means. Either they are Teflon or they are not.
Their rating is not as high as other teflon lines so it may be thinner or weaker.
The hose I use is rated for approx 3000psi, so I would assume there is a significant difference somewhere.
I can tell you that the correct PTFE (teflon) hose for fuel is not white, it is carbon impregnated black. The conductive black line is the only proper fuel rated hose. Use others at your own risk.
Their rating is not as high as other teflon lines so it may be thinner or weaker.
The hose I use is rated for approx 3000psi, so I would assume there is a significant difference somewhere.
I can tell you that the correct PTFE (teflon) hose for fuel is not white, it is carbon impregnated black. The conductive black line is the only proper fuel rated hose. Use others at your own risk.
Interested too, nearly half the price of what I put together at Summit, only downside is their selection of adapters isn't all there. Plus it says "These Aluminum Fittings are specially designed to work with our Braided Stainless Steel Lines." If this stuff isn't the best, it sounds like the entire system is gone, no re-usable components with other lines. Nor would any other AN fitting work with this tubing. Maybe it will, but doesn't sound promising.
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: San Diego/ from the 316
MEENTSS02 hit it on the head the tread mark thing can be a pain sometimes.. specially when that name is the common name used..
thanks for the input guys... same feeling i had but its sometimes the ones you never heard of that others swear by...
anyone else?
thanks for the input guys... same feeling i had but its sometimes the ones you never heard of that others swear by...
anyone else?
Not sure what "chemically the same" means. Either they are Teflon or they are not.
Their rating is not as high as other teflon lines so it may be thinner or weaker.
The hose I use is rated for approx 3000psi, so I would assume there is a significant difference somewhere.
I can tell you that the correct PTFE (teflon) hose for fuel is not white, it is carbon impregnated black. The conductive black line is the only proper fuel rated hose. Use others at your own risk.
Their rating is not as high as other teflon lines so it may be thinner or weaker.
The hose I use is rated for approx 3000psi, so I would assume there is a significant difference somewhere.
I can tell you that the correct PTFE (teflon) hose for fuel is not white, it is carbon impregnated black. The conductive black line is the only proper fuel rated hose. Use others at your own risk.
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: San Diego/ from the 316
so you wouldnt use it? it would just be used in a mild single turbo build but that is the 1st i have heard of some one using them..
more details if you dont mind....
thanks
more details if you dont mind....
thanks
Trending Topics
No, I will not be using it on my build. Doesn't matter, mild or wild, fuel lines are not something you want to cheap out on.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/AER-FCC0620/?rtype=10
This is the line i bought since its not black it isnt rated for fuel?
I can tell you that the correct PTFE (teflon) hose for fuel is not white, it is carbon impregnated black. The conductive black line is the only proper fuel rated hose. Use others at your own risk.[/QUOTE]
This is the line i bought since its not black it isnt rated for fuel?
I can tell you that the correct PTFE (teflon) hose for fuel is not white, it is carbon impregnated black. The conductive black line is the only proper fuel rated hose. Use others at your own risk.[/QUOTE]
