373 not worth installing
#41
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oshawa (Home of the 5th-gen)
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're only talking a difference of about ~250 RPM between 3.73's to 4.10's for cruising speeds (even upwards of ~80 mph). For comparison's sake, look at this:
@ 80 MPH
2.73's = 2000 RPM
3.73's = 2750 RPM
4.10's = 3000 RPM
Obviously the biggest jump is from 2.73's to 3.73's. That little bit extra upto 4.10's? Not so bad!
When I went from 2.73's to 4.10's in my car, my 100% highway mileage dropped from about ~24 MPG to ~20 MPG. What would 3.73's have offered? Maybe ~1 MPG better?
#43
Did you go from 2:73 to 3:73..I want to do that myself..How does the car feel now? I bet it was a substantial difference..Is it like having a new car now?
#44
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oshawa (Home of the 5th-gen)
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've had 2.73's, 3.23's, 3.73's, 3.90's and 4.10's in my car (don't ask! ) and every one of them have matched up to that gear calculator with ~99.9% accuracy!
I'm guessing your tach must read a little on the high side?
#45
TECH Resident
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Double check it, dude - http://www.f-body.org/gears
I've had 2.73's, 3.23's, 3.73's, 3.90's and 4.10's in my car (don't ask! ) and every one of them have matched up to that gear calculator with ~99.9% accuracy!
I'm guessing your tach must read a little on the high side?
I've had 2.73's, 3.23's, 3.73's, 3.90's and 4.10's in my car (don't ask! ) and every one of them have matched up to that gear calculator with ~99.9% accuracy!
I'm guessing your tach must read a little on the high side?
I know of the website, but it's not completely accurate vs my numbers.
I've had 2.73's, 3.42's, 3.73's, and 4.10's also. My tach might read a little high, I'm not sure. It shifts at 6k by itself and I have stock internals.
I've driven next to people on the highway and my speedo is exactly on to theirs, and these are new model vehicles. I've pulled next to 2 of the new civic's because they have the digital speedometer and it's clearly dead on vs mine.
60 mph is 2200 rpm in OD
70 mph is 2600 rpm in OD
80 mph is 2900 rpm in OD
any of those dead-on on your car?
Do you know where your car ends in 3rd at 6k?
#46
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^ i think he was just saying your tach might be a little off not the speedo, its possible, hell the more i deal with these cars the more i know anything is friggin' possible
#48
Hey Matt- the videos were great. They somewhat gave me a feel for how the gears behave in a semi stocker. I assumed when the tach jumped too quick thats where there was some wheel spin, but it didnt seem crazy or to hold you back. The one where you shifted around 6k to 110 mph was that 3rd to 4th? Thanks for putting so much thought into your reply. Buy the way if your tires arent 25.66 your RPM/MPH could vary from the charts.
#50
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oshawa (Home of the 5th-gen)
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, my #'s have been pretty much bang-on compared to the f-body.org gear calculator. One that I always remember specifically was 80 @ 3000 RPM w/4.10's.
Also, you just said "...I was in 3rd at 112, thats where 6k was." ... was that with 3.73's?! Dude, that is definitely WAY OFF!! That's the exact same RPM for 112 mph as having 4.10's!!
If that's really what your TACH is reading? I'd say it's DEFINITELY reading way too high!
And like someone pointed out, I'm not disputing what your speedo says (esp. with so many comparisons to other cars).
Unless your transmission is slipping all to hell?!
Also, you just said "...I was in 3rd at 112, thats where 6k was." ... was that with 3.73's?! Dude, that is definitely WAY OFF!! That's the exact same RPM for 112 mph as having 4.10's!!
If that's really what your TACH is reading? I'd say it's DEFINITELY reading way too high!
And like someone pointed out, I'm not disputing what your speedo says (esp. with so many comparisons to other cars).
Unless your transmission is slipping all to hell?!
#52
TECH Resident
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, my #'s have been pretty much bang-on compared to the f-body.org gear calculator. One that I always remember specifically was 80 @ 3000 RPM w/4.10's.
Also, you just said "...I was in 3rd at 112, thats where 6k was." ... was that with 3.73's?! Dude, that is definitely WAY OFF!! That's the exact same RPM for 112 mph as having 4.10's!!
If that's really what your TACH is reading? I'd say it's DEFINITELY reading way too high!
And like someone pointed out, I'm not disputing what your speedo says (esp. with so many comparisons to other cars).
Unless your transmission is slipping all to hell?!
Also, you just said "...I was in 3rd at 112, thats where 6k was." ... was that with 3.73's?! Dude, that is definitely WAY OFF!! That's the exact same RPM for 112 mph as having 4.10's!!
If that's really what your TACH is reading? I'd say it's DEFINITELY reading way too high!
And like someone pointed out, I'm not disputing what your speedo says (esp. with so many comparisons to other cars).
Unless your transmission is slipping all to hell?!
Can you confirm the 1-2, 2-3 mph's at 6k also? Are they exactly the same as the 4.10's also? 1-2 is 38-40, 2-3 is 70.
How can I find out if the tach reads high? When my tuner recalibrated my speedo for me, he also had another program where he checked a few things, and the idle rpm was exactly what it showed. I've heard the rpms can be off as they get higher. Maybe this is the case? He set it as 3.73's on my pcm, I can tell you that much.
My transmission shifts hard and precise in every gear, so I don't think its slipping one bit.
Thanks for the help so far, maybe we can pinpoint this down.
#55
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the converter is locked the F-Body.org calculator is dead on, if its unlocked all bets are off. I just dont see any normal situation being at 6K rpm with the converter locked.
To the OP, What do you do with your car? drag race? road race? enjoy high speed highway runs? whats your long term or even short term mod goals for the car? whats the tallest tire that you're willing to put under the car eventually? These answers will determine more what gear you want to go with rather than experiences. Going from a 2.73 to anything you'll see an improvement in performance as long as there is traction. Right now it looks like you're mostly concerned with traction and staying on a street tire. Without knowing anything else I would say stay with the 2.73 and spend the money elsewhere.
To the OP, What do you do with your car? drag race? road race? enjoy high speed highway runs? whats your long term or even short term mod goals for the car? whats the tallest tire that you're willing to put under the car eventually? These answers will determine more what gear you want to go with rather than experiences. Going from a 2.73 to anything you'll see an improvement in performance as long as there is traction. Right now it looks like you're mostly concerned with traction and staying on a street tire. Without knowing anything else I would say stay with the 2.73 and spend the money elsewhere.
#56
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went from 2.73's to 3.73s though myself but I really can't compare because I have a vig 3600 stall which makes the car into a completely different animal. Its setup more for the track on sticky tires so I have poor traction on street tires at best.
#57
Top Fuel--I didnt understand the 1st part. Its a stock converter and you say 3rd gear @ 6k @112 with 3.73 isnt happening. If I am the OP then track occasionally and enjoy being thrown back in my seat locally at 25 or highway at 50. I just like SOP torque. Tires 275/40/17 BFG with an occasional switch to ET Street (I think mine are like 26.1 app) I wont go 27 etc because I dont want to replace fronts again. Short term Hooker headers Y and cat back, lid, minor free mods, gears and stat and tune. Long term dont know depends how I feel after the short term changes. If it came with 3.23 instead of 2.73 I may have spent the money elsewhere but my last car was M6 and all I know is I dont like the 2.73 in my A4.
#58
I have to agree with that.. sound like you are concerned with traction on street tires and top speed then don't change to a 3.73. For roll racing I'd get a 3.23 to keep a healthy top speed in 3rd then get more Pure HP engine mods...
I went from 2.73's to 3.73s though myself but I really can't compare because I have a vig 3600 stall which makes the car into a completely different animal. Its setup more for the track on sticky tires so I have poor traction on street tires at best.
I went from 2.73's to 3.73s though myself but I really can't compare because I have a vig 3600 stall which makes the car into a completely different animal. Its setup more for the track on sticky tires so I have poor traction on street tires at best.
#59
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Top Fuel--I didnt understand the 1st part. Its a stock converter and you say 3rd gear @ 6k @112 with 3.73 isnt happening. If I am the OP then track occasionally and enjoy being thrown back in my seat locally at 25 or highway at 50. I just like SOP torque. Tires 275/40/17 BFG with an occasional switch to ET Street (I think mine are like 26.1 app) I wont go 27 etc because I dont want to replace fronts again. Short term Hooker headers Y and cat back, lid, minor free mods, gears and stat and tune. Long term dont know depends how I feel after the short term changes. If it came with 3.23 instead of 2.73 I may have spent the money elsewhere but my last car was M6 and all I know is I dont like the 2.73 in my A4.
Yes you're the OP= original poster
Based on staying with a 26" tire, I'd suggest a 3.73. It'll take you to around 130mph in the 1/4 before needing more tire. Set up well, a 3.73 10 bolt will last a long time as long as its not hit too hard off of the line. A 3.42 is even better insurance with not too big of a hit in performance compared to a 3.73
#60
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the majority of your posts on this thread is about what top speed you can hit and how well the car moves form a roll. Which is the complete opposite of this statement. good luck with your decision.