2010 Camaro SS M6 vs 2011 Mustang 5.0 M6
#21
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fontana
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And good runs and kill for that ss but why would people even race with the TC on in the first place? **** sucks...I made it a habit to turn off TC in my old goat and now in my c5...well cept for when it rains out.
#24
11 Second Club
Don't want to ruffle your feathers folks but I've yet to see a stock SS run with a new mustang at the track. It isn't even close. From what I've seen, the mustangs run anywhere from high 12s to mid 12s stock. The camaros generally run in the mid 13s to low 13s stock.
I'm not trying to bash the new SS but I do want to give credit where it is due. The 5.0 mustang is a beast.
Consider this, Ford underates the hp of the mustang , and it is 200+ lbs lighter. From what I've seen, the stang actually makes more rw hp than the SS.
I'm not trying to bash the new SS but I do want to give credit where it is due. The 5.0 mustang is a beast.
Consider this, Ford underates the hp of the mustang , and it is 200+ lbs lighter. From what I've seen, the stang actually makes more rw hp than the SS.
#27
I witnessed my buddy who has a 2010 camaro with cai/headers, and a tune on street tires and stock wheels with no weight reduction run low 12's and dog stomp a new 5.0 auto with tires cai, tune, and suspension multiple times.. soo IMO the new 5.0's are great and all but they are not all they are cracked up to be... Though I would like to have one..
#28
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't want to ruffle your feathers folks but I've yet to see a stock SS run with a new mustang at the track. It isn't even close. From what I've seen, the mustangs run anywhere from high 12s to mid 12s stock. The camaros generally run in the mid 13s to low 13s stock.
I'm not trying to bash the new SS but I do want to give credit where it is due. The 5.0 mustang is a beast.
Consider this, Ford underates the hp of the mustang , and it is 200+ lbs lighter. From what I've seen, the stang actually makes more rw hp than the SS.
I'm not trying to bash the new SS but I do want to give credit where it is due. The 5.0 mustang is a beast.
Consider this, Ford underates the hp of the mustang , and it is 200+ lbs lighter. From what I've seen, the stang actually makes more rw hp than the SS.
you camaro guys are absolute fucktards. its math, and nothing else. power:weight+traction = DUH. WINNING.
and all i hear is "OH I SAW THIS I HEARD ABOUT THAT MY BROTHER COUSINS GIRLFRIENDS BROTHERS CAMARO RUNS 10'S WITH A CAI AND SLICKS YO!"
#31
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
i agree 100%, im STILL flabbergasted people are still arguing over this.
you camaro guys are absolute fucktards. its math, and nothing else. power:weight+traction = DUH. WINNING.
and all i hear is "OH I SAW THIS I HEARD ABOUT THAT MY BROTHER COUSINS GIRLFRIENDS BROTHERS CAMARO RUNS 10'S WITH A CAI AND SLICKS YO!"
you camaro guys are absolute fucktards. its math, and nothing else. power:weight+traction = DUH. WINNING.
and all i hear is "OH I SAW THIS I HEARD ABOUT THAT MY BROTHER COUSINS GIRLFRIENDS BROTHERS CAMARO RUNS 10'S WITH A CAI AND SLICKS YO!"
#34
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
https://ls1tech.com/forums/midwester...l-stories.html
i think this car would skullfuck a camaro like yours..
#35
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
may i suggest...
https://ls1tech.com/forums/midwester...l-stories.html
i think this car would skullfuck a camaro like yours..
https://ls1tech.com/forums/midwester...l-stories.html
i think this car would skullfuck a camaro like yours..
Better yet, why don't you come down Saturday and I can skullfuck your WS.6?
#36
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
haha because i'm not the one spouting a bunch of bullshit about how badass my car is and how no 2011 gt mustang can touch it. i'll save myself the trip, the ws6 went 13.24 @ 103 in the 1/4. i don't even know if it would make it on a roadtrip that far. if you didn't notice, that gt is a legic 11 sec bolt-on car that is only getting quicker/faster. there is really no need to be so cocky. besides, unless you're sitting on a 120 car, you stand no chance against that gt...pretty simple.
#39
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
they were running 10's bolt on just 2 months after the cars hit the show room floors. i provided proof to you tools months ago. should i dig up the threads? they're also making 500+whp h/c/i now too, out of a ******* 5.0...
wait, wheres the 10 second bolt on camaro? or the 9 second bolt on + spray camaro? all i hear you guys do it bitch, and make up bull **** excuses.
5TH GEN CAMAROS ARE SLOW ******* PIGS.
yes, ford finally got a decent motor in the mustang, and you're butt hurt. its okay...
#40
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
If GM was to redesign a new motor for the proposed redesigned and lighter Camaro it would eat the Mustang up. Imagine a 5.5 version of the Coyote in a car that weighs a lot less.
Well, GM officially announced that the Camaro would, at some point in the future, be switching to their new Alpha Chassis. The Alpha Chassis will allow for GM to build a lighter, more agile next-gen Camaro, and that's a good thing. Here's some more speculation concerning the future of the Camaro though! GM has announced that they have a new engine in the works for the next-gen Corvette, and apparently the C7 will be powered by a naturally aspirated, direct-injection 5.5L V8 putting out 440 Horsepower. While the displacement on this engine's smaller, the numbers are nice (and it supposedly vastly fuel efficient over its current C6 counterpart) , and I imagine we'll probably see this new Chevy Small-Block becoming the engine du jour of the next gen Camaro SS, in some fashion. To keep the Corvette price-tag in line, they'll probably tune it down some, but that still just means the engine's not far from unlocking all of those extra ponies. All in all, it seems like a nice step in the right direction of engine design by GM, regardless of the smaller displacement.
Well, GM officially announced that the Camaro would, at some point in the future, be switching to their new Alpha Chassis. The Alpha Chassis will allow for GM to build a lighter, more agile next-gen Camaro, and that's a good thing. Here's some more speculation concerning the future of the Camaro though! GM has announced that they have a new engine in the works for the next-gen Corvette, and apparently the C7 will be powered by a naturally aspirated, direct-injection 5.5L V8 putting out 440 Horsepower. While the displacement on this engine's smaller, the numbers are nice (and it supposedly vastly fuel efficient over its current C6 counterpart) , and I imagine we'll probably see this new Chevy Small-Block becoming the engine du jour of the next gen Camaro SS, in some fashion. To keep the Corvette price-tag in line, they'll probably tune it down some, but that still just means the engine's not far from unlocking all of those extra ponies. All in all, it seems like a nice step in the right direction of engine design by GM, regardless of the smaller displacement.