Gen 5 Camaro Racing Tech, Results Drag racing, road racing, street racing. Share tech & results!

2010 Camaro SS M6 vs 2011 Mustang 5.0 M6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2011, 10:49 PM
  #41  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Dark SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by kmracer
wow dude. a street racing video is INCREDIBLY scientific, now that that video has been released all doubts are put to rest. a heavier car with less power and less traction is faster than the mustang, damn, you got me. my physics prof musta been bull shitting me.

they were running 10's bolt on just 2 months after the cars hit the show room floors. i provided proof to you tools months ago. should i dig up the threads? they're also making 500+whp h/c/i now too, out of a ******* 5.0...

wait, wheres the 10 second bolt on camaro? or the 9 second bolt on + spray camaro? all i hear you guys do it bitch, and make up bull **** excuses.


5TH GEN CAMAROS ARE SLOW ******* PIGS.

yes, ford finally got a decent motor in the mustang, and you're butt hurt. its okay...
Wow you mustang nut swingers crack me up. 10's with bolt-on's???? Seriously you are that retarded? That's full weight I'm sure. LS3 SS' have been making 500+ rwhp for almost 2 years now.

Do you own a 5.0 or are you most of the Ford fanboi's and just spout off about a car you don't have?? I'm guessing the latter. When I was at the track a few weeks ago the only almighty 5.0 there ran a 13.4

5.0's are ******* over rated
Old 04-22-2011, 10:51 PM
  #42  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Dark SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by s346k
haha because i'm not the one spouting a bunch of bullshit about how badass my car is and how no 2011 gt mustang can touch it. i'll save myself the trip, the ws6 went 13.24 @ 103 in the 1/4. i don't even know if it would make it on a roadtrip that far. if you didn't notice, that gt is a legic 11 sec bolt-on car that is only getting quicker/faster. there is really no need to be so cocky. besides, unless you're sitting on a 120 car, you stand no chance against that gt...pretty simple.
Until you get a 5.0 or a faster car then I would just STFU. I may be sitting on a 120 car, I haven't tested the new combo yet. 118 sounds about right for what I have.
Old 04-24-2011, 03:57 PM
  #43  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Dark SS
Until you get a 5.0 or a faster car then I would just STFU. I may be sitting on a 120 car, I haven't tested the new combo yet. 118 sounds about right for what I have.
what makes you think i haven't owned cars faster than yours? you are very narrow-minded. i am far from a nutswinger. i simply state the obvious and hold an open mind. i'd be upset if i were you too...financing a car like that to go fast hahaha. to be honest, i wouldn't buy a new mustang or fbod. i could easily make this car faster than yours with about 10% of your investment. i hope you do have a 120+ car because you will get embarrassing with an attitude like that.
Old 04-24-2011, 09:14 PM
  #44  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
kmracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dark SS
Wow you mustang nut swingers crack me up. 10's with bolt-on's???? Seriously you are that retarded? That's full weight I'm sure. LS3 SS' have been making 500+ rwhp for almost 2 years now.

Do you own a 5.0 or are you most of the Ford fanboi's and just spout off about a car you don't have?? I'm guessing the latter. When I was at the track a few weeks ago the only almighty 5.0 there ran a 13.4

5.0's are ******* over rated
ls1's made 500whp h/c/i years ago...

how is this a retarded concept? it happened in october...

last time i was at the track i saw a brand new camaro run 17's.
Old 04-24-2011, 10:21 PM
  #45  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Dark SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by s346k
what makes you think i haven't owned cars faster than yours? you are very narrow-minded. i am far from a nutswinger. i simply state the obvious and hold an open mind. i'd be upset if i were you too...financing a car like that to go fast hahaha. to be honest, i wouldn't buy a new mustang or fbod. i could easily make this car faster than yours with about 10% of your investment. i hope you do have a 120+ car because you will get embarrassing with an attitude like that.
You have to pay to play. It doesn't matter how much money you pay or put it into a car, the only thing that matters is if you can cover the guy next to you. I guess I have enough money to pay 10 times what you can and I'm ok with that, I have enough money.
Old 04-24-2011, 10:22 PM
  #46  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Dark SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by kmracer
ls1's made 500whp h/c/i years ago...

how is this a retarded concept? it happened in october...

last time i was at the track i saw a brand new camaro run 17's.
Yes, they are 17 sec. cars. All day long.
Old 04-25-2011, 05:13 PM
  #47  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Dark SS
I guess I have enough money to pay 10 times what you can and I'm ok with that, I have enough money.
yes, by default, because i chose not to purchase a 5th gen fbod you > me . on a positive note, at least you're running the **** out of it.
Old 04-26-2011, 12:32 AM
  #48  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Dark SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by s346k
yes, by default, because i chose not to purchase a 5th gen fbod you > me . on a positive note, at least you're running the **** out of it.
That's not what I'm saying at all. I just hate that argument that some can go faster than another person with less money. Obviously that's true, I could build a 6.0 iron block and shove it in a chevette and be a hell of a lot faster. Money is irrelevant, buy the car that you like and have fun.
Old 04-26-2011, 09:21 PM
  #49  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Dark SS
Money is irrelevant, buy the car that you like and have fun.
i know, but you were picking on a stock ta, i had to say something. the car actually went 8.29 @ 88 in the 1/8 on that 13.2 pass, but something in the plugs/wires gave up at the top of 3rd. whisper lid and weld in flowmaster 80 series. it also has sportlines and a pro5.0, but i don't consider those "real" mods.

any track times with your car? i've seen a couple m6 ls3 cars around here go down the track, but your 17 second comment applies. one dude has a h/c car that went something like 12.6 @ 118. made 525whp on a local dyno.
Old 04-27-2011, 12:52 AM
  #50  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Dark SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by s346k
i know, but you were picking on a stock ta, i had to say something. the car actually went 8.29 @ 88 in the 1/8 on that 13.2 pass, but something in the plugs/wires gave up at the top of 3rd. whisper lid and weld in flowmaster 80 series. it also has sportlines and a pro5.0, but i don't consider those "real" mods.

any track times with your car? i've seen a couple m6 ls3 cars around here go down the track, but your 17 second comment applies. one dude has a h/c car that went something like 12.6 @ 118. made 525whp on a local dyno.
At the end of last season my car went 12.69 @ 111.3 with a Roto-Fab intake, baseline tune, and an MGW shifter. I would consider that pretty lightly modded on stock Pirelli's @ 35 psi. This year the car has full bolt-on's and will have a 125-150 shot. I need to get a re-tune and some tires. Last weekend at 66 they only ran 1/8 so I couldn't get a baseline on the bolt-on's but it did pick up 2mph in the 1/8 compared to last season's best. I wasn't picking on a stock T/A till you said I would get "skull fucked" by that 5.0
Old 04-27-2011, 08:15 AM
  #51  
TECH Regular
 
sweetC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey dark, next time you hit rt66 let me know man I live 30 min from there! I am dying to hit the track for the first time with my 5th gen!
Old 04-27-2011, 08:41 AM
  #52  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Huggerorange73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Norridge, IL
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dark...you're car is slow man...just get over it and move on already.
Old 04-27-2011, 07:24 PM
  #53  
TECH Regular
 
sweetC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Give it some time guys, us 5th gen guys will be beating up on everything! The problem is there are to many damn guys worried about rims and dyno queens right now! Once the racers start buying them things will change! These car's are heavy but they make killer power, once people start installing 4.33's and drag wheel setups the non believer's will shut there holes! My olds was 4000lbs and I had no problem running 11.50's on a stock bottom end, 4.10's and slick's. The problem with the 5th gen right now is there is not many people doing what NEEDS to be done, DRAG WHEELS AND GEARS... even to stock SS I think that would be a huge impact! One guy proved it already, running 11.80,s with headers, tune and drag wheels, add gears in the mix you might break 11.50s! Thats pretty damn good if you ask me.
Old 04-27-2011, 08:04 PM
  #54  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by sweetC5
Once the racers start buying them things will change!
how many "racers" do you know will purposely buy a factory built 4000lb+ car with irs? those are 2 things people trying to get **** done do not want. just a thought...
Old 04-27-2011, 08:08 PM
  #55  
TECH Regular
 
sweetC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I did... Not that I am hard core... but I have plans
Old 04-28-2011, 12:48 AM
  #56  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Dark SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

It's inevitable that people who own LS1's will start buying 5th gens. Most people on this site would buy one if they were cheaper. It's just a matter of time before prices drop. The GTO seems to have a pretty decent "racer" fallowing.
Old 04-28-2011, 09:37 AM
  #57  
TECH Regular
 
sweetC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

exactly!
Old 04-29-2011, 03:04 AM
  #58  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
kmracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dark SS
It's inevitable that people who own LS1's will start buying 5th gens. Most people on this site would buy one if they were cheaper. It's just a matter of time before prices drop. The GTO seems to have a pretty decent "racer" fallowing.
not nearly as well as the lighter solid axle cars.
Old 04-29-2011, 08:14 AM
  #59  
TECH Regular
 
sweetC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hell thats fine with me, just means when my car is done people will underestimate it! Hell go on streetfire, there are a few camaros running cam only and ruining alot of peoples night's Theres a vid with a header's, intake and no tune 10ss running with some pretty bad stangs (gt500) and holding its own.
Old 04-29-2011, 06:36 PM
  #60  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

if all you're interested in is roll racing then the irs isn't AS important, but weight obviously still plays a major role.

i hope to see some of these cars doing big things, but it's not looking good. hell gm can't even get a camaro to compete with the factory drag cars that ford and mopar both are producing. i like the looks of the challengers the best, but i've managed to hurt a couple 6 speed cars in the stock ta haha. i'm guessing weight is their biggest enemy, as well.


Quick Reply: 2010 Camaro SS M6 vs 2011 Mustang 5.0 M6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 AM.