Gen 5 Racing Tech Heads, cam, valvetrain, short block discussion

How durable is the Automatic in the new Camaro?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2008 | 05:38 AM
  #21  
BigBake's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Viginia Beach, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Jay Vicious
stock for stock a 6 speed should never lose, why is it MOST fbodys

autos do 13.7 - 13.4
6spd does 13.5-13.0

Odd my auto ran 12.9 bone stock, and so have several others. Your information is flawed and obviuosly based upon another era. Maybe get current and come back to the discussion when you have factual information that is current to the 4L60E and the new 6L80E transmissions.
Old 12-06-2008 | 10:07 AM
  #22  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
LS1Tech Co-Founder
20 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 44,823
Likes: 1,247
From: Chicago, IL
Default

I'll take the bet that the A6's will be faster than the M6 cars and here are my two reasons, not trying to be jerk about it either:

-Wheel hop. This will be much worse with a stick car, so the M6 guys will be trying to figure out how how high you can come out and how hard you can shift 1-2 without getting more wheelhop or spinning. Have you driven an IRS C5 or C6?

-Most M6 guys won't be super abusive to their M6 cars, so most folks will try to avoid breaking the rear end. I don't doubt that Evan Smith will at some point get put behind the wheel of a car, but he told me when he ran that 12.98 in a 4th gen (told me this at an NMRA race in the press box) that he slipped the clitch out at a pretty high rpm like 4500 and he was not driving it like it was his.
Old 12-06-2008 | 04:12 PM
  #23  
Tainted's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Default

I've got news for auto ahters.

An auto with a shift kit and stall is faster than a manual car in almsot every case. They can shift faster and harder
Old 12-06-2008 | 04:14 PM
  #24  
CWW17's Avatar
Teching In

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Default

Ah, its nice to see I'm not alone in this. I mean seriously, I could pull up in a Bugatti Veyron and some of the people on here would say "Aw.. it's an automatic? That's gay."
Old 12-07-2008 | 07:34 PM
  #25  
imma_stocker's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 36
From: Country
Default

FYI, new Camaro auto comes with a steeper rear gear.
Old 12-07-2008 | 07:45 PM
  #26  
WECIV's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
From: Gulf Shores and DC
Default

I don't think the new A6 will need a shift kit...stall should be enough.

W
Old 12-07-2008 | 07:59 PM
  #27  
JD_AMG's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,799
Likes: 16
From: St.Charles MO
Default

Originally Posted by Tainted
I've got news for auto ahters.

An auto with a shift kit and stall is faster than a manual car in almsot every case. They can shift faster and harder
The "auto haters" enjoy the driving experience and better control they get from a manual transmission. I want to drive my car, not sit there and stomp the gas while the computer shifts for me(and not when I want, or don't want it to).

Originally Posted by CWW17
Ah, its nice to see I'm not alone in this. I mean seriously, I could pull up in a Bugatti Veyron and some of the people on here would say "Aw.. it's an automatic? That's gay."
The Veyron (and other exotics) don't come with a conventional auto (torque converter) for a good reason.
Old 12-07-2008 | 08:02 PM
  #28  
Camaro Z's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
From: Monroe, Iowa
Default

For fourth gen F-bodys: Stock for stock the M6 WILL out run the auto in an even good race. Mainly because of the gearing. Now throw a stall and steeper gears into the auto and its game over for the M6 without gears. I'm sure the new 5th gens will have great automatic transmissions. Personally I will never own an automatic sports car/muscle car, it just takes alot of the fun out of it IMO.
Old 12-07-2008 | 09:34 PM
  #29  
imma_stocker's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 36
From: Country
Default

The gf laughed at me when I mentioned (maybe) getting an auto. Something about my chick calling me out stuck in my mind hahaha Still driving my manual and patiently awaiting the Camaro SS with LS3/TR6060.
Old 12-08-2008 | 09:13 AM
  #30  
shandy294's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: Cibolo Tx
Default

My cousin's wife has a 98 Corvette with an auto;I doubt her left foot has ever rested on a clutch pedal. That car(or an f-body) w/o a manual just doesn't seem right. Quickness of shifing is only one thing to consider.
Old 12-08-2008 | 09:57 AM
  #31  
TT632's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 963
Likes: 1
From: Any dragstrip any time
Default

I didn't start this thread to be an Auto vs manual debate. Looking for good feed back on how much power the GM A6 can take.
Old 12-08-2008 | 02:36 PM
  #32  
imma_stocker's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 36
From: Country
Default

Originally Posted by TT632
I didn't start this thread to be an Auto vs manual debate. Looking for good feed back on how much power the GM A6 can take.
fair enough. As already stated, the 6L80 was tested BY GM using their trucks and rated to mid-400 ft-lbs. AFAIK GM's 6spd auto was developed and first implemented with the Duramax diesel, then altered to put into C6 vettes, then dropped into the G8 GT, and now being used in the new Camaro.... etc.

Anyways, the amount of torque it should take before being an issue cannot be determined at this time as it is too new. But you want an actual range so there are G8s and vettes at 600-700 whp without common issues yet.
Old 12-08-2008 | 06:24 PM
  #33  
someday's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: here, ny
Default

slightly off topic, but i noticed something odd today... the 300hp 3.6L camaro has a 6L50 trans, while the front drive 250hp 3.6L malibu has a stronger 6T70 trans...
Old 12-08-2008 | 07:00 PM
  #34  
imma_stocker's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 36
From: Country
Default

Originally Posted by someday
slightly off topic, but i noticed something odd today... the 300hp 3.6L camaro has a 6L50 trans, while the front drive 250hp 3.6L malibu has a stronger 6T70 trans...
Longitudinal vs Transaxle perhaps?
Old 12-09-2008 | 08:39 PM
  #35  
Black Sunshine/ 00SS's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by imma_stocker
fair enough. As already stated, the 6L80 was tested BY GM using their trucks and rated to mid-400 ft-lbs. AFAIK GM's 6spd auto was developed and first implemented with the Duramax diesel, then altered to put into C6 vettes, then dropped into the G8 GT, and now being used in the new Camaro.... etc.

Anyways, the amount of torque it should take before being an issue cannot be determined at this time as it is too new. But you want an actual range so there are G8s and vettes at 600-700 whp without common issues yet.
Keep in mind the ratings on the truck are vehicles that weigh alot more than the new Camaro will.I'd say that it's a pretty dam strong tranny. 600 hp range easy.

I'm not sure if I'll be getting one. Probably will, so auto, or manual.. I didn't think I'd be racing the 01 I bought new, but look at what happened, lol. I'd probably get the manual for the fun factor, and for the fuel economy & just keep the 01 for race..

What is the top gear ratio in the auto vs manual? Meaning 6th gear & rear end gear?
Old 12-09-2008 | 08:57 PM
  #36  
Double-L's Avatar
On The Tree

 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Pendleton, Indiana
Default How about 2,000+ runs

I wouldn't worry one bit about the auto being strong enough, I have a 04 SSR that weighs in at 4880 with gas and me in it, Now to run that through a 1/4 mile is hard on the tranny right, Well I have well over 2,000 passes, That is over 2,000 1/4 runs, How hard 1.60 60 ft. and 11.50's et so I am not taking it easy, So a LS1 and built 4L60 and I drive it all the time to boot
Old 12-10-2008 | 03:12 PM
  #37  
TT632's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 963
Likes: 1
From: Any dragstrip any time
Default

Originally Posted by Double-L
I wouldn't worry one bit about the auto being strong enough, I have a 04 SSR that weighs in at 4880 with gas and me in it, Now to run that through a 1/4 mile is hard on the tranny right, Well I have well over 2,000 passes, That is over 2,000 1/4 runs, How hard 1.60 60 ft. and 11.50's et so I am not taking it easy, So a LS1 and built 4L60 and I drive it all the time to boot
Thats over 600 to the ground, Impressive. Is it Supercharged? Is the trans built?
Old 12-10-2008 | 05:42 PM
  #38  
OKcruising's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

Wow, there's some serious misinformation about the 6L80/6L90.

1. Super/hyper exotics still have clutches in there; but they are automated manual transmissions or sequential boxes. There is no converter in there, there are no belts, and no clutch packs within the transmission.

2. The 6L80/90E was NOT designed for the 6.6L duramax, as that engine would grenade the gearbox in very short order. Instead, the 6L90 has a MAX of 520 input ft. lbs, which they designed so they could put the baby d-max and LSA behind it. The 6L90 comes in the new CTS-V and the gas 2500/3500's.

3. The 6L80/90 are clutch-to-clutch, which means that before you start getting super high horsepower cars using it, that the timing of the clutch-to-clutch action has to be perfect. See the Allison transmissions in the pulling trucks. I've noticed an uptick in sticking built TH400 and built 4L8x's behind Cummins and Dmax's so that reliability of the truck is maintained during the pass.

4. Like any automatic, you'll still have less efficiency than a manual gearbox.

The jury is still out on these transmissions. They cost an arm and a leg to have built up. It'll take a few years more before the fail points are well known and mods for it cheap and plentiful.
Old 12-10-2008 | 07:19 PM
  #39  
jay_lt4's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
Default

ill be finding out what the 6l80 trans can take as soon as i get my camaro, the stroker engine and a 3000 stall plus some spray should put it to the test. if the 6l80 doesnt hold up the 6l90 trans should not be too hard to swap in, it is only a little bit longer than the 6l80 trans

i dont think these trans too expensive, i have seen them on e-bay for $1000-$1500

another guy at our shop had a 6l80 apart for a leak and the internals looked way stronger and clutch's were huge compared to a 4l60e and those can be built to go 10's easy, i built my own 60e and went 10's no problems for years
Old 12-10-2008 | 09:14 PM
  #40  
Double-L's Avatar
On The Tree

 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Pendleton, Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by TT632
Thats over 600 to the ground, Impressive. Is it Supercharged? Is the trans built?

Yes it is super charged and the tranny is full built by RPM, Here is a video of a hard run,

http://s3.photobucket.com/albums/y80...R_1169_Run.flv


Quick Reply: How durable is the Automatic in the new Camaro?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.