Interior of the 2010 Camaro 6cyl car is beyond cheap
#21
Staging Lane
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Homestead, Fl
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i like the challenger too, personaly i think it looks alil better(extirior) than the camaro but thats just my opinion but i'm a loyal gm person and the camaro still looks bad *** and u cant beat GM powerplants either.
#22
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Gee an opinion from a guy with 20 post, who is ragging on the Camaro. Sounds likes a Mustang/Challenger troll
EDIT: No just a Challenger troll, after a simple search, if you check out some of his other post:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/search.php?do=process
Are we a little biased there Outlaw55?
EDIT: No just a Challenger troll, after a simple search, if you check out some of his other post:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/search.php?do=process
Are we a little biased there Outlaw55?
![Owned](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/owned.gif)
#23
12 Second Club
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thats weak!!! Everyone know Mopar sucks *** and their direction was to aim for "people" that wants to put big the biggest heaviest rims on their cars.Wanna talk about cheap.... ! word...DODGE! Just like the name...steer clear!
#25
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#26
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Honestly why does everyone care about the interior of these cars. I am a part time parking attendant and I park Mercedes', BMW, and Audi's all the time. Those brands are for high class individuals that don't know crap about cars and normally just want to get from point A to point B as comfortably as possible. We buy camaro's for the intense and raw power of their high HP and Torque engines not for their luxury amenities. When you drive a Camaro you should automatically be distracted by their big displacement engines and unique/classic looks. Also, I park alot of Fords' particularly Mustangs and you can see how the '08s have a terrible build quality. The doors in the '08 stangs feel heavier than my '98 Z doors, that's a shame. I'm 20 years old and to tell you the truth I'm surprised in what people are looking for in their cars. These are Camaro's not 745i, 750i, AMG, A6, electric shavers lol.
#27
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#32
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just try the doors on a 79 camaro, 8 feet long and weigh a ton, no fiberglass in there. Interior wise they would have had to cut costs to get the price point with the drivetrain and suspension so it has the same feel as a Cobalt. If they made the interior as nice as possible too this car would cost just as much a Corvette.
#33
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
After having sat in all three now, I think the mustangs' plastic interior is super cheap and some of the upscale stang versions are comparable to the base camaro. The base camaro is comparable to the base challenger and chargers. Now when you get to the SRT-8 levels of those vehicles the SS package looks a lot better in the camaro.
All I'm saying is no matter how cheap the interior feels or looks, its better in quality than most stangs on the road (especially base 05+ mustangs and the cheaper GTs) and incredibly comparable to the same vehicles in its class
All I'm saying is no matter how cheap the interior feels or looks, its better in quality than most stangs on the road (especially base 05+ mustangs and the cheaper GTs) and incredibly comparable to the same vehicles in its class
#34
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#35
On The Tree
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Doughnuts on your lawn!
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#36
#37
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The funniest thing about this entire post is that Motor Trend (some of the biggest anti car yay interior people out there) claimed that this car is unworthy to be compared to a Mustang or Challenger, and that the G37 and 335 should look out.
#38
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Whats funny is that a lot of the V6 models at the car show are EARLY EARLY preproduction models with unfinished interiors. In fact a lot of them you couldnt even sit in because of that. I bet that is what has happened to the OP. GM is making the interiors amazing nowadays even on base base models (not counting the Aveo).
#39
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Berkley, MI
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
To the original poster, I couldn't disagree more. The cars I sat in recently at the auto show had nice two-tone leather interior, nice lighting for the gauges, excellent layout, nicely shaped unique steering wheel, much nicer switches & controls than the competition, Charger & Mustang.