Gen 5 Racing Tech Heads, cam, valvetrain, short block discussion
View Poll Results: Twin Turbo V6 Camaro
Hell freaking yeah!
80
54.05%
No, V8 or bust.
68
45.95%
Voters: 148. You may not vote on this poll

Twin Turbo V6 Camaro?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2009 | 03:41 PM
  #21  
Meemperor's Avatar
Staging Lane

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SlvrV6Camaro
I would do it, just to be different.....if the 3.8 in the 4th gens can be made into a dam good performer then I know for sure the new V6 in the 5th gen will be that much better. But I want a V8 SS as well....so maybe both? haha


3800's made over 900whp on stock rods and stock block.

And a few junkyard motors have been into the 9's with 3800's. Bone stock bottom ends. I doubt the new V6 will be better.

Tuning and the thing will be a bitch just like all the Direct Injected stuff right now. IIRC the Turbo Cobalts won't even let you add a mod without dialing the power back through timing/fuel .
Old 03-25-2009 | 03:49 PM
  #22  
FiredUpZ28's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 1
From: Elgin, Il
Default

I very much so think it could be better. With 24 valves helping it breathe up top as opposed to 12, upper RPM so much more killer on these.
Old 03-25-2009 | 04:05 PM
  #23  
Johnnystock's Avatar
TECH Addict
10 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 38
From: Canada
Default

Itll end up pricier for the same performance or less. Better off with the stock LS3 and start modding it after.
Old 03-26-2009 | 01:23 AM
  #24  
Meemperor's Avatar
Staging Lane

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FiredUpZ28
I very much so think it could be better. With 24 valves helping it breathe up top as opposed to 12, upper RPM so much more killer on these.
I'll take a better power band over peak HP anyday, but it's basically a Direct Injected LY7. Cams aren't available, nothing internal is easily available. There are some bolt on CSC kits making some good power (350whp) but they are VERY pricey, and the bottom end is known not to be as strong as the 3800's. That's why the 3.8L's are great, amazing blocks. No need to build them
Old 03-27-2009 | 09:26 PM
  #25  
wannafbody's Avatar
TECH Veteran
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,805
Likes: 867
From: Pittsburgh
Default

A twinscrew blower would be the best way to go ont he V6 (I think).
Old 03-29-2009 | 12:42 AM
  #26  
twelver12's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: Mooresville, Indiana
Default

i believe its coming were entering the turbo age here damn near every car coming out is gonna have a turbo and a smaller engine in the coming years i just did a research paper on this in school and renault is already working with a less than 1 liter engine with a turbo, reason being a small engine with a turbo can perform just as well as a larger engine without one and have better fuel economy and is cheaper to produce, im stickin with my v8's as long as they are around though idc if i start getting my a&$ kicked by turbo four cylinder school busses nothing can replace that exhaust note.
Old 04-06-2009 | 12:07 PM
  #27  
ChevyChad's Avatar
8 sec potential, 12 sec slip
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,092
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
Default

Where is the TT V8 option in this poll?
Old 04-13-2009 | 11:42 AM
  #28  
skymarauder's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: chitown
Default

Originally Posted by ChevyChad
Where is the TT V8 option in this poll?
that option is sitting in front of my house

cept its a single turbo.. but still!
Old 04-13-2009 | 03:40 PM
  #29  
Flaring Afro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

First off, that'll void warranty. Secondly, anyone who wants the power will get the V8. Theres no real market for this, yet. Maybe in 6 years or so...
Old 04-14-2009 | 12:08 PM
  #30  
chevy8806's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: New Albany, Ohio
Default

Trust me on this... 3.6 is a very strong v6. Before they could only get 260hp out of a SC 3800 but now they get 300 out of a DI 3600! The problem is the whole top end. It is junk. The heads are **** and the cams walk in and out. Second is the cam sprokets are ****. It will jump time easy! With the right amount of $$$ you could fix these issues but right now with virtually no aftermarket product; i would stay away from these engines. I dont see putting a bolt on tt or any forced induction setup on a 3.6 would be safe. They got 11.4:1 compression. The good thing about the engine is the vvt that when they make a cams (yea cams:2in 2ex 3chains!) for it; that motor would scream! Also for the "mechanicaly inclined" this motor is no 3.8 to work on.

Last edited by chevy8806; 04-14-2009 at 12:27 PM.
Old 05-11-2009 | 04:29 PM
  #31  
Build #1's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 1
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

I would never take one over an LS3, but sure make it, someone will buy it.
Old 05-13-2009 | 02:37 PM
  #32  
Grand National 5-0's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by samson_420
Cool idea in a way. . . . But, it is a fact Camaro owners love v8's, including me.


There is absolutely nothing wrong with a TT settup on any car, but it just does not scream GM muscle. . . . My 2 Cents.
Ummmm.....huh? look in my sig, thats a V6 and its also considered a GM muscle car so.....?

i think what you mean is that a CAMARO with a V6 does not scream GM muscle...
Old 05-13-2009 | 05:22 PM
  #33  
DaveX's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, KY
Default

It's a cool idea but I'd rather have a V8. As for fuel mileage, the V6 is not much better right now than the V8. I'm guessing with boost it would get less than the V8. One of the issues with doing it though might be the fuel injectors. Isn't this the DI motor? I doubt there is much in the way of aftermarket injectors available.
Old 05-14-2009 | 12:56 PM
  #34  
hefftone's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 437
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, Ga (2.7 miles from Southeastern Dragway)
Default

I could'nt pick one over an LS3, but I'd love to see the result's,...the block is designed to displace up to 4.0L. The mazda turbo I4's are running 10.0:1 compression with direct injection. And this LLT is running on 87 octane. So even with a properly sized single turbo, it could be a wicked motor, maybe not so much in a camaro, but in a decent RWD Pontiac G6 type car,... be an awesome daily driver... I'd get rid of my 97 M3 and all its headaches.
Old 05-14-2009 | 03:16 PM
  #35  
Chronicle's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by chevychad
where is the tt v8 option in this poll?
+1
Old 05-20-2009 | 09:33 PM
  #36  
Only_A6's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

I have a 3.8 (and very proud of it) and I am planning on putting a turbo on the car and using the same block. I see no problem with doing a turbo set up for v6's. If you are a into cars and you have a passion for them, then you have respect for the GNX/GN which had a 3.8 liter and gave the V8's something to cry about. The 98-02 camaro's carry that 3.8 and it is a very good block. I have 122k miles on mine and it still runs great. If you love the f-body then you love all models of it, not just the ones with two extra cylinders. I say yes to a turbo/twin turbo set up to any V6 model. If you support it then that is great if not then don't be pissed when you see my tail lights but show some respect, ha.



Quick Reply: Twin Turbo V6 Camaro?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM.