First SS dyno.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 28, 2009 | 12:01 PM

#41

LS1Z28-00

10 Second Club

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 296

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymond mckinney

All i care about will it beat 03-04 Cobras stock vs. stock, if not thats sad!!

They wont beat them but they will get pretty close. It will be a drivers race. the fastest stock time for a terminator was 12.4@114. And Z06 vettes are faster stock for stock no doubt. but with 300-400 dollars in mods on the cobra...look out.

Mar 28, 2009 | 12:16 PM

#42

LS1Silverado05

TECH Addict

iTrader: (41)

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 2,374

Likes: 1

From: Classified

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChevyChad

I can't believe some of you guys are doggin 365 RWHP! As someone has already said- thats just under 15% drivetrain loss from the advertised rating. Since when did 365 REAR WHEEL HP become something to scoff about on a STOCK car with probably less than 50 miles on it?

We are spoiled a bit I think... Mustang guys would get a hard on if their stock cars could dyno that..

Mar 29, 2009 | 05:11 AM

#43

mattkimsey

TECH Apprentice

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 314

Likes: 0

From: Bessemer City NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by LS1Z28-00

But that 12.4 was with Evan Smith driving....the same guy that ran 12.8 in a '98 Z28. I wonder what he can pull in a new SS? 12.5? 12.6?

Mar 29, 2009 | 08:24 AM

#44

BYE RICE

TECH Regular

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 492

Likes: 1

From: (904)

Quote:

Originally Posted by LS1Silverado05

We are spoiled a bit I think... Mustang guys would get a hard on if their stock cars could dyno that..

Welcome to 2003.
Those are EXACTLY the same numbers stock Terminators put down...Actually that was about average for those cars.
My brother's car put down 365/347 bone stock before his 1st oil change.

Mar 29, 2009 | 09:11 AM

#45

qwk93ta

TECH Addict

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 2,240

Likes: 1

From: Fairfield, Ohio

With the new government standards for MPG feel lucky that GM even produced this car, in a few years we may not see these kind of stock numbers.

Mar 29, 2009 | 11:22 AM

#46

UltraZLS1

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts: 1,264

Likes: 55

From: Hanover, Michigan

Your brothers car was behind 25ft lb of torque

Mar 29, 2009 | 12:18 PM

#47

BYE RICE

TECH Regular

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 492

Likes: 1

From: (904)

Quote:

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1

Your brothers car was behind 25ft lb of torque

I was incorrect..I meant 374..
I was going from memory..It's been a few years.
& the stock RWHP of his Cobra was 368.
365 was the power I was making with an LS6 intake,Mac mids/Flowmaster cat back,& an '01 LS6 cam back in 2002.

Mar 29, 2009 | 04:12 PM

#48

UltraZLS1

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts: 1,264

Likes: 55

From: Hanover, Michigan

Nice. But dyno numbers mean nothing when comparing cars unless it was the same dyno on the same day with the same calibration.

Ive been looking and have seen stock rwhp numbers for the cobra between 340-390whp depending on dyno.

So it looks like both cars put out similar numbers. Cobra 200 pounds lighter. Likely it is a slightly faster car stock for stock.

And you know what...I dont care.

Also, what does 365whp on a modded car on a different dyno (maybe) on surely a different day have to do with these stock numbers?