Katech 2010 Camaro head/cam package
01-07-2012, 02:23 PM
#24
Launching!
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Disneyland or St Louis
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What was the the Time and Trap speed in the 1/4 mile? I could give a **** about the Dyno numbers. I'm looking for a Head and Cam combo for an L99 DOD delete and I want to go fast.
What was the specs on the cam? Whats the CC flow through the head?
What was the specs on the cam? Whats the CC flow through the head?
01-07-2012, 09:23 PM
#25
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: here, ny
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i just reread the post... the title is misleading... it says heads/cam package... i thought the car had ported heads also... i take back what i said, 105hp is good for just a cam/boltons... and a fairly mild cam at that... equivalent to a 224/230 on an LS1...
Last edited by someday; 01-09-2012 at 09:58 PM.
01-08-2012, 03:02 AM
#26
We just wrapped up this beautiful black 2010 Camaro SS with our LS3 head/cam package. We also used the car for a couple of new development items such as our heater hose relocation kit.
The package includes:
Katech Torquer LS3 camshaft
PSI single beehive springs
Katech titanium retainers
Katech C5-R timing chain
Trend pushrods
WCCH ported LS3 heads
Serialized plaque
The package includes:
Katech Torquer LS3 camshaft
PSI single beehive springs
Katech titanium retainers
Katech C5-R timing chain
Trend pushrods
WCCH ported LS3 heads
Serialized plaque
01-09-2012, 08:22 AM
#28
Cam: 224/236 .581/.601 113
Heads: http://proheads.com/WCCH%20L92.html (Stage 2)
01-12-2012, 02:35 AM
#29
Launching!
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Disneyland or St Louis
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We never performed quarter mile testing.
Cam: 224/236 .581/.601 113
Heads: http://proheads.com/WCCH%20L92.html (Stage 2)
Cam: 224/236 .581/.601 113
Heads: http://proheads.com/WCCH%20L92.html (Stage 2)
How close are these two. I know the cam was a little more aggressive on the timed car.
They both look good. To bad no time, even if you had to let him borrow some tires it would have been nice to know.
01-12-2012, 07:06 AM
#30
You have another thread with a 5th gen Camaro that was 10.83 @ 128mph I think. It looked like you could get a little more out of it.
How close are these two. I know the cam was a little more aggressive on the timed car.
They both look good. To bad no time, even if you had to let him borrow some tires it would have been nice to know.
How close are these two. I know the cam was a little more aggressive on the timed car.
They both look good. To bad no time, even if you had to let him borrow some tires it would have been nice to know.
01-13-2012, 02:18 PM
#31
I believe you are mixing up some company names here a little bit.
Cartek is the one with the 10.8 at 128mph/129mph car:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/gen-5-cam...mph-129-a.html
Katech is the one in the thread that we're in right now.
01-13-2012, 04:01 PM
#32
Launching!
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Disneyland or St Louis
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually no, they don't LOL.
I believe you are mixing up some company names here a little bit.
Cartek is the one with the 10.8 at 128mph/129mph car:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/gen-5-cam...mph-129-a.html
Katech is the one in the thread that we're in right now.
I believe you are mixing up some company names here a little bit.
Cartek is the one with the 10.8 at 128mph/129mph car:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/gen-5-cam...mph-129-a.html
Katech is the one in the thread that we're in right now.
Sorry for the mix up
Cartek / Katech They must be cousins
01-14-2012, 01:28 AM
#33
They both sure have built some seriously FAST cars. 
01-14-2012, 03:33 AM
#34
Launching!
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Disneyland or St Louis
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
