You heard it here first
#41
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (67)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Freakenhye
Ok once again from Scotts own mouth. "What we have planned for the Camaro will put the Mustang, and Challenger to Shame. Im not saying what engine we are going to use but you will see both vehicles in the rearview mirror in there top of the line form."
This mean 500hp Mustang, 425hp Challenger will not be a problem.
This mean 500hp Mustang, 425hp Challenger will not be a problem.
#42
On The Tree
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Freakenhye
Ok once again from Scotts own mouth. "What we have planned for the Camaro will put the Mustang, and Challenger to Shame. Im not saying what engine we are going to use but you will see both vehicles in the rearview mirror in there top of the line form."
This mean 500hp Mustang, 425hp Challenger will not be a problem.
This mean 500hp Mustang, 425hp Challenger will not be a problem.
#44
Launching!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not to defend the enemy but in stock form the GT 500 isn't too impressive. It's response to mods is. I thought one went 9's with bolt ons, tune and gears? That is why we'll probably see a stock LS9 SS (supercharged) putting everything but the Z06 to shame. It'll have a nice price tag too.
Also, C6's are no joke. The 6.0 C6 is just a little slower than the C5 Z06 and the C5 Z is still a bad *** car.
Best part of it all is this is just the beginning. As long as the Feds don't impede too much we'll see some serious power in the next few years.
Also, C6's are no joke. The 6.0 C6 is just a little slower than the C5 Z06 and the C5 Z is still a bad *** car.
Best part of it all is this is just the beginning. As long as the Feds don't impede too much we'll see some serious power in the next few years.
#45
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calabasas, CA
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
anyone who expects many engine options ofr the camaro is smokin crack. GM finally got smart and started cutting the number engines available down, this way the R&D can be focused on make a few reliable motors rather than several motors.
the 3.6 DOHC motor is their main v6 right now. it has replaced the 3.9L and in many applications the 3.5L. i would expect the 3.6L as the v6, and 1...maybe 2 v8 motors. that 6.0L engine that is talked about here is the one with variable displacement, which has great gas mileage. i can see them using that to bring the mpg up so to allow for a more poerful v8 in a super camaro.
the 3.6 DOHC motor is their main v6 right now. it has replaced the 3.9L and in many applications the 3.5L. i would expect the 3.6L as the v6, and 1...maybe 2 v8 motors. that 6.0L engine that is talked about here is the one with variable displacement, which has great gas mileage. i can see them using that to bring the mpg up so to allow for a more poerful v8 in a super camaro.
#46
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fast01z28
anyone who expects many engine options ofr the camaro is smokin crack. GM finally got smart and started cutting the number engines available down, this way the R&D can be focused on make a few reliable motors rather than several motors.
the 3.6 DOHC motor is their main v6 right now. it has replaced the 3.9L and in many applications the 3.5L. i would expect the 3.6L as the v6, and 1...maybe 2 v8 motors. that 6.0L engine that is talked about here is the one with variable displacement, which has great gas mileage. i can see them using that to bring the mpg up so to allow for a more poerful v8 in a super camaro.
the 3.6 DOHC motor is their main v6 right now. it has replaced the 3.9L and in many applications the 3.5L. i would expect the 3.6L as the v6, and 1...maybe 2 v8 motors. that 6.0L engine that is talked about here is the one with variable displacement, which has great gas mileage. i can see them using that to bring the mpg up so to allow for a more poerful v8 in a super camaro.
Another thing, if making cars have fewer options is so smart than why do most cars that get the "option cutting" end up being the last? Options=sales. The truck market should tell you that...
#47
My guess is the following for powerplants:
1) Base - 3.6 DOHC DI V6 ~250-275 hp
2) Entry V8 - 5.3 LH7 with AFM - ~330 hp
3) Top Line V8 - LS3 with ~435hp (At least in the first model year, maybe a SCd version later)
With its lighter weight, better gearing/trans the LS3 Camaro should beat the SRT8 Challenger especially if the Challenger comes with the 6.1 425HP motor instead of the 6.4 505hp motor.
That is just my gut feeling, it'll be interesting to see what happens
1) Base - 3.6 DOHC DI V6 ~250-275 hp
2) Entry V8 - 5.3 LH7 with AFM - ~330 hp
3) Top Line V8 - LS3 with ~435hp (At least in the first model year, maybe a SCd version later)
With its lighter weight, better gearing/trans the LS3 Camaro should beat the SRT8 Challenger especially if the Challenger comes with the 6.1 425HP motor instead of the 6.4 505hp motor.
That is just my gut feeling, it'll be interesting to see what happens
#49
Originally Posted by Gaunt
The new camaro will basically be the G8.
6.0L 362 HP engine will be just ONE of the THREE v8 options.
There will be ONE high performance v6 option. Not exactly sure of the size of the engine yet, however its a pretty good guess that it is the same 3.6L 261 HP engine in the G8.
I REPEAT, THE NEW CAMARO IS BASICALLY THE G8!
Believe me or not...don't really care. When it comes out, I will be posting this thread as proof
Have a nice day.
6.0L 362 HP engine will be just ONE of the THREE v8 options.
There will be ONE high performance v6 option. Not exactly sure of the size of the engine yet, however its a pretty good guess that it is the same 3.6L 261 HP engine in the G8.
I REPEAT, THE NEW CAMARO IS BASICALLY THE G8!
Believe me or not...don't really care. When it comes out, I will be posting this thread as proof
Have a nice day.
And you heard it here FIRST that you're wrong.......
..........and just atwixt us....what would you like on those words when they're served up?????
#50
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lakeland, Fl
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
And you heard it here FIRST that you're wrong.......
..........and just atwixt us....what would you like on those words when they're served up?????
..........and just atwixt us....what would you like on those words when they're served up?????
#52
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: anozirA
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thought the post was locked. in any case, you will see that I'm right.
If you go by post count, sure I do not seem very credible, but I already addressed this. I don't care.
And subsequently, all you naysayers, what proof do you have that I am wrong? Not that it's proof im right, but what makes you so sure that you are?
If you go by post count, sure I do not seem very credible, but I already addressed this. I don't care.
And subsequently, all you naysayers, what proof do you have that I am wrong? Not that it's proof im right, but what makes you so sure that you are?
#54
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: anozirA
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wallywall
Your seriously saying the Fbodfather is wrong?! (assuming that's really Scott)
Tell me otherwise instead of acting incredulous.
EDIT: If the mods could please re-lock this, I would greatly appreciate it. I knew this would generate posts, but I originally intended something to show "I told you so" that I could post down the road.