Did GM screw up Camaro street king status?
#81
not new it wasn't, let's keep it apples and apples....
#82
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This entire thread makes me laugh at the original poster. "OH MY V6 WILL RUN WITH A NEW V6 CAMARO, EVEN IF MINE'S A 1995 MUSTANG." Go the **** away. Apparently you don't know **** about cars. The day your 112 whp V6 outruns a 260whp V6 6-speed 2010 Camaro, will be the day I sign my entire fortune over to some punk like you. Get the hell out. Also; 0000000etc, your fanboying **** is done. They supercharged a 4.6 to AN INCREDIBLE 350 HORSES! OH WOW! LS1's came stock from the factory with that kind of power. I have watched, stock for stock, an LS1 SS completely own a 2004 Cobra. There was NOTHING that Cobra could do to save itself. And mods; warn me for this if you want; but **** you, 0000etc, You're a douchebag. You come on to a forum titled "LS1TECH.COM" and then proceed to rant about how much LSX's suck, and how awesome your piece of **** little pony is. And then you whine when you get told off. So go **** yourself, sir.
I did not come hear to say LS1 suck. I just dont think GM has as big a gap in power like they used too. And no Camaro's were not always faster then Mustangs. Foxbody's being one example.
On another note remember when the 05 GT came out? Motortrend put down a 13.1 in an auto 5-speed. Which is generally what a Mach 1 or LS1 Camaro time is. Yes I know there are great drivers out there that can probably pull insane qtr times in the Camaro but for the most part the 05-08 GT with the avg driver can hang with an LS1 F-body. And doing it with a heavier motor with 1.1 less liters. Get over it, its fact.
On a track who knows I think the F-body would win on a course.
ZX666r, GT500 came in at 41k not 45k. But the convertible was 45k. I agree for that price I'd rather have a base Corvette too.
Last edited by caseypayne69; 07-21-2008 at 07:13 AM.
#83
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How does it make you feel that the Mustang v6 alone outsold all F-bodys combined?
#84
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Battle Creek MI
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also you stated that if the F-body would have been around in 03-04 the most H.P. it would have had would have been 345. Ever heard of the LS6? If the Camaro was in production when the Cobra was built you could bet your *** that it would have had a 400 horse LS6 and would have run faster times than the cobra.
#85
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
it makes me feel good that the mustang outsold the camaro. every other person and their ******* grandma around here drives a v6 mustang LOL. I am not kidding. we all know the measure of a sports car is its sales. I mean i see corvettes and vipers every other turn. and damn that ford taurus must rip...they sell the **** out of those
you sir are on crack if you think for one second that an ls1 wouldnt walk an 05 gt. they put down 260-270whp stock (ON average) compared to the ls1's 300 AVERAGE(I have seen 320+) and weigh the same. Oh and btw they have even less torque...which is what wins all the traces according to you. oh and guess which motor responds better to mods? do a head and cam swap on your 05 gt ( or should I say cams and belts chains and **** also and pay a LOT more and be a LOT harder to do but thats another argument) and race a h/c ls1...omg that would be funny as hell to watch.
and what the hell is this 13.1 u are talking about? and the ls1 "Might be faster". jesus christ you are ignorant or have had your *** way to far up into mustang fantasy land to realize the stupidity of your statements. the most recent test I just seen for the mustang was with the 315 horsepower 5 speed bullitt...which is faster than a GT and they pulled a 13.6 with it. and even if this 13.1 did happen. then something was ******* going on...they had a freak car, iced the intake, tuned it etc etc. all things compareable an ls1 would have ran a 12.5 that day in fantasy land.
a new mustang gt would have its hands full with an lt1...you can bet on that. ( several mags and people have gone mid to high 13's with them)
anything else?
and you still never told me how it feels to know that an 11-12 year old motor can wipe the floor with fords latest rustang?
oh and nice call quick T/a...the 350 tpi did run right with the 5.0 stock for stock. which in mustang fanboy ignorance 15 years later means that the 5.0 killed it. LOL think about it if they are now saying the new 4.6 hangs with the LS1 I can see how this myth started very easaily way back then.
hell while im at it... a 350 tpi 91-92 z28 (245hp 345 tq) would spank a 96-98 mustang gt...how does this make you feel also? HAHA
you sir are on crack if you think for one second that an ls1 wouldnt walk an 05 gt. they put down 260-270whp stock (ON average) compared to the ls1's 300 AVERAGE(I have seen 320+) and weigh the same. Oh and btw they have even less torque...which is what wins all the traces according to you. oh and guess which motor responds better to mods? do a head and cam swap on your 05 gt ( or should I say cams and belts chains and **** also and pay a LOT more and be a LOT harder to do but thats another argument) and race a h/c ls1...omg that would be funny as hell to watch.
and what the hell is this 13.1 u are talking about? and the ls1 "Might be faster". jesus christ you are ignorant or have had your *** way to far up into mustang fantasy land to realize the stupidity of your statements. the most recent test I just seen for the mustang was with the 315 horsepower 5 speed bullitt...which is faster than a GT and they pulled a 13.6 with it. and even if this 13.1 did happen. then something was ******* going on...they had a freak car, iced the intake, tuned it etc etc. all things compareable an ls1 would have ran a 12.5 that day in fantasy land.
a new mustang gt would have its hands full with an lt1...you can bet on that. ( several mags and people have gone mid to high 13's with them)
anything else?
and you still never told me how it feels to know that an 11-12 year old motor can wipe the floor with fords latest rustang?
oh and nice call quick T/a...the 350 tpi did run right with the 5.0 stock for stock. which in mustang fanboy ignorance 15 years later means that the 5.0 killed it. LOL think about it if they are now saying the new 4.6 hangs with the LS1 I can see how this myth started very easaily way back then.
hell while im at it... a 350 tpi 91-92 z28 (245hp 345 tq) would spank a 96-98 mustang gt...how does this make you feel also? HAHA
Last edited by UltraZLS1; 07-21-2008 at 10:31 AM.
#87
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
i think this vid might tingle your fancy. there are plenty more to watch on the net if you look. but i honestly take these with a grain of salt ( 2 many variables)...but I cant help but laugh at this destruction
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JGjADLxH4b0
i would guess this at about 15 car lengths by 120. but it is so bad it is really very hard to estimate that kind of distance without a gps. LOL
the mustang guys response is priceless...."the window was up i mean down" LOL and the fear in his breathing before the race is priceless ( at 1:46-1:47). now i know how it feels to be a mustang gt owner lol
the ls1 had some MINOR mods.lid, smooth bellow, ls6 intake which came stock on 01-02 cars, slp exhaust cat back, came stock on SS cars. the only thing he really has is his tune. he doesnt even have headers. so Ill go ahead and remove 5 lengths (generous) for that reason and the gt owner might have been able to read the license plate.
is that "might be faster"? ( a couple mustang guys actually did make themselves think that after watching lol if you read the comments) and btw the mustang got a good start and didnt even miss gears. and the mustang guy even got to do the beeps so you can forget those arguments. from the looks of this vid an lt1 would rock that thing.
now im waiting to hear about how those mods were such a big deal
im listening
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JGjADLxH4b0
i would guess this at about 15 car lengths by 120. but it is so bad it is really very hard to estimate that kind of distance without a gps. LOL
the mustang guys response is priceless...."the window was up i mean down" LOL and the fear in his breathing before the race is priceless ( at 1:46-1:47). now i know how it feels to be a mustang gt owner lol
the ls1 had some MINOR mods.lid, smooth bellow, ls6 intake which came stock on 01-02 cars, slp exhaust cat back, came stock on SS cars. the only thing he really has is his tune. he doesnt even have headers. so Ill go ahead and remove 5 lengths (generous) for that reason and the gt owner might have been able to read the license plate.
is that "might be faster"? ( a couple mustang guys actually did make themselves think that after watching lol if you read the comments) and btw the mustang got a good start and didnt even miss gears. and the mustang guy even got to do the beeps so you can forget those arguments. from the looks of this vid an lt1 would rock that thing.
now im waiting to hear about how those mods were such a big deal
im listening
Last edited by UltraZLS1; 07-21-2008 at 11:02 AM.
#88
TECH Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GM's DI V6 looks impressive on paper too but it's not going to give the Mustang GT a run for it's money on the drag strip or at stoplights. The Camaro is about the size and weight of the CTS and that car doesn't run anywhere close to the Mustang GT. I've also driven the new CTS a few times and it doesn't make it's grunt down low and it runs out of breath up high.
#90
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think your missing the point that a 03/04 Cobra comes with a blower on the show room floor with a warranty and built block. The F-body did not. With that being said what ever money you put into an F-body to beat it. Drop the same cash in a 03/04 Cobra and its back on top.
#91
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With avg drivers they pull about the same QTR times. With a professional driver the LS1 Camaro might be faster, but doesnt give enough reason to buy one over a new Stang. I wouldn't drive a 05-08 GT and say oh woe is me, the Camaro is a few tenths faster. Ohhh.
How does it make you feel that the Mustang v6 alone outsold all F-bodys combined?
How does it make you feel that the Mustang v6 alone outsold all F-bodys combined?