Gen 5 Racing Tech Heads, cam, valvetrain, short block discussion

Did GM screw up Camaro street king status?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2008, 06:30 AM
  #81  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Tom's_03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zx666r
Wait wait wait... you're comparing a Camaro to a 45k car?! Put a GT500 up against an 02 Z06..? And the GT500 is only 500hp, bud. Also, it runs the 1/4 in ~12.9. An 02 Z06 runs ~12.6 in the 1/4. And is about 15k cheaper, at least.
not new it wasn't, let's keep it apples and apples....
Tom's_03SVT is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 06:41 AM
  #82  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
caseypayne69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Semper91-RS
This entire thread makes me laugh at the original poster. "OH MY V6 WILL RUN WITH A NEW V6 CAMARO, EVEN IF MINE'S A 1995 MUSTANG." Go the **** away. Apparently you don't know **** about cars. The day your 112 whp V6 outruns a 260whp V6 6-speed 2010 Camaro, will be the day I sign my entire fortune over to some punk like you. Get the hell out. Also; 0000000etc, your fanboying **** is done. They supercharged a 4.6 to AN INCREDIBLE 350 HORSES! OH WOW! LS1's came stock from the factory with that kind of power. I have watched, stock for stock, an LS1 SS completely own a 2004 Cobra. There was NOTHING that Cobra could do to save itself. And mods; warn me for this if you want; but **** you, 0000etc, You're a douchebag. You come on to a forum titled "LS1TECH.COM" and then proceed to rant about how much LSX's suck, and how awesome your piece of **** little pony is. And then you whine when you get told off. So go **** yourself, sir.
The conversation was about the new V6 Camaro having near the hp of the 05 v8 Mustang. Where you got off topic of v6 vs v6 talk I don't know. The S/C 4.6 had around 425 hp not 350 like you say, where you get your info I don't know. And 425 hp from a DOHC 4.6 liter with a warranty and 31k is a steal of ah deal.

I did not come hear to say LS1 suck. I just dont think GM has as big a gap in power like they used too. And no Camaro's were not always faster then Mustangs. Foxbody's being one example.

On another note remember when the 05 GT came out? Motortrend put down a 13.1 in an auto 5-speed. Which is generally what a Mach 1 or LS1 Camaro time is. Yes I know there are great drivers out there that can probably pull insane qtr times in the Camaro but for the most part the 05-08 GT with the avg driver can hang with an LS1 F-body. And doing it with a heavier motor with 1.1 less liters. Get over it, its fact.

On a track who knows I think the F-body would win on a course.


ZX666r, GT500 came in at 41k not 45k. But the convertible was 45k. I agree for that price I'd rather have a base Corvette too.

Last edited by caseypayne69; 07-21-2008 at 07:13 AM.
caseypayne69 is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 07:18 AM
  #83  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
caseypayne69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
a 1998 z28 is faster than a 2008 mustang gt.

how does that make a mustang fan feel? I want to know. seriously
With avg drivers they pull about the same QTR times. With a professional driver the LS1 Camaro might be faster, but doesnt give enough reason to buy one over a new Stang. I wouldn't drive a 05-08 GT and say oh woe is me, the Camaro is a few tenths faster. Ohhh.

How does it make you feel that the Mustang v6 alone outsold all F-bodys combined?
caseypayne69 is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 08:18 AM
  #84  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
QuickT/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Battle Creek MI
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by caseypayne69
And no Camaro's were not always faster then Mustangs. Foxbody's being one example.
Stock for the stock the 350 TPI owned the 5.0 in a quater mile especially the 91-92 F-bodys, when ford brought out the 93 Cobra to beat them GM released the LT1 and Ford took it in the sniffer again.

Originally Posted by caseypayne69
On another note remember when the 05 GT came out? Motortrend put down a 13.1 in an auto 5-speed. for the most part the 05-08 GT with the avg driver can hang with an LS1 F-body. And doing it with a heavier motor with 1.1 less liters. Get over it, its fact.
Where do you get your drugs? There is no time in the real world where an 05 mustang can run with an LS1. Maybe an LT1

Also you stated that if the F-body would have been around in 03-04 the most H.P. it would have had would have been 345. Ever heard of the LS6? If the Camaro was in production when the Cobra was built you could bet your *** that it would have had a 400 horse LS6 and would have run faster times than the cobra.
QuickT/A is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 10:17 AM
  #85  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

it makes me feel good that the mustang outsold the camaro. every other person and their ******* grandma around here drives a v6 mustang LOL. I am not kidding. we all know the measure of a sports car is its sales. I mean i see corvettes and vipers every other turn. and damn that ford taurus must rip...they sell the **** out of those

you sir are on crack if you think for one second that an ls1 wouldnt walk an 05 gt. they put down 260-270whp stock (ON average) compared to the ls1's 300 AVERAGE(I have seen 320+) and weigh the same. Oh and btw they have even less torque...which is what wins all the traces according to you. oh and guess which motor responds better to mods? do a head and cam swap on your 05 gt ( or should I say cams and belts chains and **** also and pay a LOT more and be a LOT harder to do but thats another argument) and race a h/c ls1...omg that would be funny as hell to watch.


and what the hell is this 13.1 u are talking about? and the ls1 "Might be faster". jesus christ you are ignorant or have had your *** way to far up into mustang fantasy land to realize the stupidity of your statements. the most recent test I just seen for the mustang was with the 315 horsepower 5 speed bullitt...which is faster than a GT and they pulled a 13.6 with it. and even if this 13.1 did happen. then something was ******* going on...they had a freak car, iced the intake, tuned it etc etc. all things compareable an ls1 would have ran a 12.5 that day in fantasy land.

a new mustang gt would have its hands full with an lt1...you can bet on that. ( several mags and people have gone mid to high 13's with them)

anything else?

and you still never told me how it feels to know that an 11-12 year old motor can wipe the floor with fords latest rustang?


oh and nice call quick T/a...the 350 tpi did run right with the 5.0 stock for stock. which in mustang fanboy ignorance 15 years later means that the 5.0 killed it. LOL think about it if they are now saying the new 4.6 hangs with the LS1 I can see how this myth started very easaily way back then.

hell while im at it... a 350 tpi 91-92 z28 (245hp 345 tq) would spank a 96-98 mustang gt...how does this make you feel also? HAHA

Last edited by UltraZLS1; 07-21-2008 at 10:31 AM.
UltraZLS1 is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 10:36 AM
  #86  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
SS#1531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Posts: 349
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

I think everyone (both sides of the argument) in this forum needs to come down to reality. Too much exaggeration on both sides.
SS#1531 is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 10:53 AM
  #87  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

i think this vid might tingle your fancy. there are plenty more to watch on the net if you look. but i honestly take these with a grain of salt ( 2 many variables)...but I cant help but laugh at this destruction

http://youtube.com/watch?v=JGjADLxH4b0

i would guess this at about 15 car lengths by 120. but it is so bad it is really very hard to estimate that kind of distance without a gps. LOL

the mustang guys response is priceless...."the window was up i mean down" LOL and the fear in his breathing before the race is priceless ( at 1:46-1:47). now i know how it feels to be a mustang gt owner lol

the ls1 had some MINOR mods.lid, smooth bellow, ls6 intake which came stock on 01-02 cars, slp exhaust cat back, came stock on SS cars. the only thing he really has is his tune. he doesnt even have headers. so Ill go ahead and remove 5 lengths (generous) for that reason and the gt owner might have been able to read the license plate.

is that "might be faster"? ( a couple mustang guys actually did make themselves think that after watching lol if you read the comments) and btw the mustang got a good start and didnt even miss gears. and the mustang guy even got to do the beeps so you can forget those arguments. from the looks of this vid an lt1 would rock that thing.

now im waiting to hear about how those mods were such a big deal

im listening

Last edited by UltraZLS1; 07-21-2008 at 11:02 AM.
UltraZLS1 is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 11:16 AM
  #88  
TECH Veteran
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
The Camaro has always been faster than the Mustang. Well guess what, that didn't mean jack in terms of sales.
True story.

GM's DI V6 looks impressive on paper too but it's not going to give the Mustang GT a run for it's money on the drag strip or at stoplights. The Camaro is about the size and weight of the CTS and that car doesn't run anywhere close to the Mustang GT. I've also driven the new CTS a few times and it doesn't make it's grunt down low and it runs out of breath up high.
TriShield is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 11:17 AM
  #89  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
ramairjohn2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: allentoon, pa
Posts: 894
Received 53 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

this casey payen has been on several threads talkn smack he is a moron please stop bantering with him mods lock this thread and him too please......
ramairjohn2000 is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 11:40 AM
  #90  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
Assassin66's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by caseypayne69
I think your missing the point that a 03/04 Cobra comes with a blower on the show room floor with a warranty and built block. The F-body did not. With that being said what ever money you put into an F-body to beat it. Drop the same cash in a 03/04 Cobra and its back on top.
no you are missing the point...i bought my Z/28 for $9K thats about 12-14 grand cheaper than an 03-04 cobra...and while 12-14 grand is not enough to build a good boost motor, after that i don't need an incredible amount of money to tear a new ******* on a cobra even if he is modded. Warranty really? its an 03-04 model warranty is gone man and even if it weren't it would be void after you start ******* the the motor...there is levels of fanboyism but you are way out there my friend
Assassin66 is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 11:55 AM
  #91  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
Assassin66's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by caseypayne69
With avg drivers they pull about the same QTR times. With a professional driver the LS1 Camaro might be faster, but doesnt give enough reason to buy one over a new Stang. I wouldn't drive a 05-08 GT and say oh woe is me, the Camaro is a few tenths faster. Ohhh.

How does it make you feel that the Mustang v6 alone outsold all F-bodys combined?
how does it make you feel that they call the mustang the secretary car? and that all those v6s were sold to ugly fat chicks?
Assassin66 is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 01:23 PM
  #92  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by caseypayne69
Never mind the side air vents that are direct ripoffs of the Mustangs.
what side vents are you talking about? ever seen a '69 Camaro?

the stangs need a 6.2L to help them keep up with the pudgy SRT crowd
fast is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 01:58 PM
  #93  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
djsanchez2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Simi Valley, CA.
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

/END OF DISCUSSION FULL SPECS BROCHURE!!!

http://www.chevrolet.com/camaro/pdf/...ifications.pdf
djsanchez2 is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 02:18 PM
  #94  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
Assassin66's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

3860lbs and 422hp/408tq for the manual SS...guess all the mustang and challengers will be getting a face full of tail lights!!!
Assassin66 is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 05:20 PM
  #95  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Exactly
UltraZLS1 is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 09:22 PM
  #96  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
383ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Assassin66
how does it make you feel that they call the mustang the secretary car? and that all those v6s were sold to ugly fat chicks?
dude, that is sig material LMAO
383ss is offline  



Quick Reply: Did GM screw up Camaro street king status?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 PM.