GM why not a DOHC LS motor?
#21
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ah ok. i thought we were refering to stock size dohc lol. either way its good info
#22
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: brookings Or.
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i cant think of one good reason why GM should make the transition to OHC motors. ive worked on 4.6's in rustangs b4 and it makes me wonder "WHY THE HELL" people buy them! like the saying goes- ''if it aint broke, dont fix it''-. GMs pushrod v8's punk on almost everything out there, so there's really nothin much to gain from goin to a ohc/dohc v8,imo. especially since vvt came out on LS's.
plus its fun to say "you just got beat by 60 yr old technology"![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
+1
= pushrods![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
= 10 ft timing chains
plus its fun to say "you just got beat by 60 yr old technology"
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
+1
![Thumb](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/thumb.gif)
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
![Thumbsdown](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/thumbsdown.gif)
#25
Teching In
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I didn't know the new LS's had VVT. I have that in my DD. Do you know if it works the same? The VVT in my daily driver when you hit a specific RPM a pin locks the rocker to a middle rocker and that rides on a different cam lobe. The hole concept is cool.
Also, talking about 'future' some day we'll be talking about how many watts our electric motor is not HP. I'd say 15 years maybe.
Also, talking about 'future' some day we'll be talking about how many watts our electric motor is not HP. I'd say 15 years maybe.
#26
Teching In
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
and a little googling...
Variable Valve Timing - The Next Phase
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...s_engines.html
Variable Valve Timing - The Next Phase
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...s_engines.html
#27
Banned
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The only reason DOHC engines make more power (from the factory) than pushrod engines is the 4V/cyl. The combustion chamber doesn't care if the engine is DOHC or OHV. The 4V head is not what we call in the industry "valve limited." Once you open up a set of 2V heads to flow what a 4V head will, the gap is closed. It's all about air in and air out.
VVT and VTEC and all that other mumbo jumbo is there for one thing and one thing only: low end power and cruising MPG. It has no advantage in a race over a car with a single cam specced for top end power. It is akin to running 2 cams in one engine because there are optimal valve events for cruising around town and optimal valve events for a wide open throttle drag race. It just does both, it doesn't do one or the other better than a single cam specced to do one of those things.
VVT and VTEC and all that other mumbo jumbo is there for one thing and one thing only: low end power and cruising MPG. It has no advantage in a race over a car with a single cam specced for top end power. It is akin to running 2 cams in one engine because there are optimal valve events for cruising around town and optimal valve events for a wide open throttle drag race. It just does both, it doesn't do one or the other better than a single cam specced to do one of those things.
#29
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
The only downside I can see to a DOHC motor is the timing belt.
Other then that they are far less complicated, rev better, make more power etc..
I think it would be pretty sweet to have a LS DOHC motor.Why not GM? Or am I missing some good reasons there not used?
Only V8 DOHC motor GM made that I've seen is the Northstar and that think from what I gather reading wiki was junk.
Only V8 DOHC motor GM made that I've seen is the Northstar and that think from what I gather reading wiki was junk.
#30
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
When an OEM makes an engine, they have the following priorities to worry about (there are a lot more, but this answers the question)
Packaging size
Power output
Emission
Weight
Cost
Lets compare the 5.0 mustang motor to the LS3
LS3 is smaller
LS3 makes more power
LS3 is lighter
LS3 is cheaper (parts are used on all ls series of motors to get quanities of scale vs a single application)
The last time I was having a beer with some GM employees at a Ford event, this question came up.
Ryan
Packaging size
Power output
Emission
Weight
Cost
Lets compare the 5.0 mustang motor to the LS3
LS3 is smaller
LS3 makes more power
LS3 is lighter
LS3 is cheaper (parts are used on all ls series of motors to get quanities of scale vs a single application)
The last time I was having a beer with some GM employees at a Ford event, this question came up.
Ryan
#32
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,338
Likes: 0
Received 1,775 Likes
on
1,265 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech20year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I also agree completely with this:
VVT and VTEC and all that other mumbo jumbo is there for one thing and one thing only: low end power and cruising MPG. It has no advantage in a race over a car with a single cam specced for top end power. It is akin to running 2 cams in one engine because there are optimal valve events for cruising around town and optimal valve events for a wide open throttle drag race. It just does both, it doesn't do one or the other better than a single cam specced to do one of those things.
#33
Teching In
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Doubtful. An industry wide shift from currently building 99.9% gas or gas + electric cars to 100% electric-only cars in just 15 years is highly unlikely, especially for the performance based platforms. I expect to see new gasoline/hybrid engines still being built well past 15 years from now..
Performance cars might be the some of the first places you see all electric. 13.2 sec 1/4 in a tesla all electric car is pretty respectable. Take out 900lbs of batteries and replace them with a hydrogen fuel cell. That could be one fun kick in the ***!
Also want to say that I have no hard on for OHC. Just from the little that I knew the concept seems good. My first car was an Eagle Talon with a 2.0 DOHC and that was an impressive motor. Once you make it a V motor things get exponentially more complicated. I didn't know or realize that and that was the hole point of me starting this thread.
Last edited by brian.moritz; 07-29-2010 at 01:46 PM.
#34
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just throwing the idea out there for a discussion. I've had this discussion with some gear head friends, I think all engines today should be dual overhead cam. The only downside I can see to a DOHC motor is the timing belt. Other then that they are far less complicated, rev better, make more power etc.. I think it would be pretty sweet to have a LS DOHC motor.Why not GM? Or am I missing some good reasons there not used?
Only V8 DOHC motor GM made that I've seen is the Northstar and that think from what I gather reading wiki was junk.
Only V8 DOHC motor GM made that I've seen is the Northstar and that think from what I gather reading wiki was junk.
2. as others have proved, OHC vs OHV isnt where the power is made. an engine is an air pump, air in & air out. more is better.
3. why fix what aint broke? especially considering the r&d $$ behind building a new series of engines with GMs current situation. they have been kicking *** with OHV for years with big power, great torque curves (big design goal for the LSx engines), lightweight, small in physical size, etc.
#36
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#38
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,338
Likes: 0
Received 1,775 Likes
on
1,265 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech20year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Guess it really depends on gas prices. When they get back up to $4, $5, even $6/gal there would be a lot of motivation to switch. Whoever cracks the hydrogen nut will be one well off dude. Hybrid cars are a waste of time IMO.
Performance cars might be the some of the first places you see all electric. 13.2 sec 1/4 in a tesla all electric car is pretty respectable. Take out 900lbs of batteries and replace them with a hydrogen fuel cell. That could be one fun kick in the ***!
Performance cars might be the some of the first places you see all electric. 13.2 sec 1/4 in a tesla all electric car is pretty respectable. Take out 900lbs of batteries and replace them with a hydrogen fuel cell. That could be one fun kick in the ***!
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
Whatever may replace gasoline, the technology will be more costly for quite a while, further prolonging a complete shift in consumer buying habits. Even if they started rolling out 1-2 new 100% electric car and truck models from every major OEM today, I still doubt that gasoline engines would be totally off the order sheet within 15 years. It will take a long time to get all the consumers on board, and for prices to equalize between the two.
But, I think hybrids are a better idea currently than 100% electric cars.
#40
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
There are 4 valve aftermarket lsx heads available. They use a forked rocker to push 2 valves open at once. Great heads, flow over 400cfm I heard. Based on the pics I saw I had trouble picturing those heads fitting in my TA and not having clearance issues with the wheel well.
I'm completely sick of hearing people measure an engines worth by power to displacement. A much better standard would be power to engine weight.
I'm completely sick of hearing people measure an engines worth by power to displacement. A much better standard would be power to engine weight.