odd request
SO, with that being said, would anyone who has a parts car or roller lying around mind making a quick video for me? I wish to show the prosecutor that F-bodies with T-Tops are notoriously easy to get into. I have explained to them earlier that in the past I have locked myself out of the car and reached through the window and unlatched the t-tops in order to get in (without the dumb alarm going off), and they went to a local GM dealership and asked a tech there if that was possible... he explained that the windows do not flex AT ALL, and there is no way to bend the glass out the 1 inch needed to slide your hand in and flip the latch.
So, if anyone would be kind enough to make a quick video of themselves popping the t-top latch from outside the car, I would be grateful.
Bonus points for anyone who has an ebay vats bypass box, or a self-built one (the kind that plugs into the PCM from inside the engine bay), and can demonstrate how it functions.
Thanks in advance for anyone who can help.
Also, it would be helpful if someone can find a published document stating how the VATS system can "disable" itself in an event that it discovers an error would be useful. I have seen people talking about this before, and experienced it myself once, where the security light is on, and the VATS just doesnt bother trying to match resistors, yet still allows the car to still operate.
Why don't you try to find a way to break into your own car to prove to them it's possible. I guess someone could do it if they had a laptop and tuned VATS out right there...
I suppose in your county I would've stole my own radio huh?
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
As for Z28_LT1, I don't have my firebird, so I cannot produce this evidence myself, hence asking. I have researched this crap way too much the past 6 months, and found some rather scary things... such as a how-to manual on how to bypass vats from inside the engine bay, and ebay bypass boxes, however... it won't hold up in court without video proof, or an "expert" verifying it (a GM manual explaining the theory behind it will suffice). We all know here that the vats RARELY functions perfectly for the life of the car, hence the need for people to bypass it. We all know that the window can be pulled back to reach in, or use a stick to unlock the door... but if a GM tech claims it is impossible to move that window... they are going to believe his word instead of mine unless I can come up with some way to show otherwise.
Yes, I realize people may assume I am doing this to learn how to steal a car, or just trying to gain a personal army to do this for me, but I am not. If someone who has access to a junker to make a quick video, that would be great. If someone has access to some repair manuals or diagrams to illustrate my point, that would be awesome. Unfortunatly I have no clue where to even begin finding such documents, but I know some of the techs here do... hence asking.
Last edited by xephona; Aug 18, 2010 at 01:05 AM.
I hit a deer, they total car and pay off loan
I get cut off and spin out on ice, they pay the repair
I sit in class and NOT drive the car while it is destroyed... they pay nothing
Seems as long as I admit I screwed up, they will pay, the instant something happens that I did not do... CRIMINAL!!! FRAUD!!!!
They have no hard evidence, I was in class all day with plenty of witnesses, security guard saw car there earlier in day, and not there later in day while i was still in class. Their "evidence" is that I was 3 days late on my car payment at that point (still within the 15 day grace period), the insurance-hired forensic investigator saying that the key that "last operated this car" was one of the "proper type" (no **** since I drove it TO the investigator after they recorvered it), and a GM tech saying the windows dont bend and the only way in the door is to use a key... sigh.
I live in a hillbilly town of less than 9000 people, with a grand total of two auto thefts a year... and a gung-ho detective who doesnt want a black mark on his perfect cities record. The detective himself said that if this was a bigger city, the case would have been thrown out, but they have so few major issues that they can spend the year trying to prove my guilt.

In this city, a police officers opinion is enough evidence to start a case, no evidence needed to initiate. Hopefully they don't use the same logic in determining guilt.
Now, I don't know if it matters, but I had a hardtop and hand crank windows.
Last edited by GSus; Aug 18, 2010 at 02:27 PM. Reason: Stupid iPhone and it's version of auto correct






