General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

My lsx 454 is junk. Lsx454 lsx-454

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2011, 08:19 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
prostreetbuyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default My lsx 454 is junk. Lsx454 lsx-454

My engine block was dimensionally defective having less than the advertised metal thickness. An important component of the engine block’s strength comes from having enough metal thickness to support a load.
The industry standard and Chevrolet’s standard for cylinder wall thickness is a minimum of .200 thousands of an inch. Summit Racing and Chevrolet’s own advertising for the lsx block states “maximum 4.250 bore at .200 minimum wall thickness”. My defective block had a intentional smaller 4.185 bore, hence the remaining cylinder wall thickness should have been .2325. However the sonic testing that was performed post-mortem discovered a bore thickness as little as .177 which effectively cheated me of .0555 thickness of metal or using a simple analogy in dollars, I was entitled to $232.50 but only received $177.00 dollars. A shortage of $55.50 or 24 percent!
Old 04-27-2011, 08:42 AM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

What was your bore post mortem? The requested 4.185 or something else?
Old 04-27-2011, 01:17 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
5.3LJimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Napoleonville, LA
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Core shift was a common problem with the early run of LSX blocks causing some blocks to have less than optimal wall thickness after boring. This was supposed to be taken care of with the redesigned second run. How old is this block?
Old 04-27-2011, 10:53 PM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
prostreetbuyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 5.3LJimmy
Core shift was a common problem with the early run of LSX blocks causing some blocks to have less than optimal wall thickness after boring. This was supposed to be taken care of with the redesigned second run. How old is this block?
it was produced in oct 2010
Old 04-28-2011, 08:11 AM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
5.3LJimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Napoleonville, LA
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

That rules that out. You should have one of the "good" blocks.
Old 06-21-2011, 09:03 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
prostreetbuyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

any other opinions?



Quick Reply: My lsx 454 is junk. Lsx454 lsx-454



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 AM.