View Poll Results: Which muscle car generation do you prefer?
Old School
48
55.81%
New School
38
44.19%
Voters: 86. You may not vote on this poll
Old Muscle Car Generation vs New Muscle Car Generation
#21
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
From that era also...65 Mustang, 69 Charger, 72 & 73 Charger, 73 & 79 Vette to name a few, but I would NOT go back to that era. I suppose everyone has one that they would love to have stashed away (for me it is a car I never owned and it's from a movie...the black 1970 Charger from Fast & Furious)...but I busted more knuckles and spent more time crawling around under them that I want to remember. I like modern conveniences and reliability. Now if I could just afford the new stuff...
#22
Pontiacerator
iTrader: (12)
A glance at my sig makes it obvious that I love both generations - enough to own both an auto and a manual in each. I daily drove 60's Pontiacs for years, but one day when I came close to rear-ending somebody, I made up my mind that I needed a modern car for daily driving. I'm with RPM WS6 - I could care less about gadgetry.
Anti-lock brakes, the performance, and reasonable fuel economy are the highlights of the new cars. The styling, simplicity, great ride, and raw aggressiveness are the charm of old muscle.
Anti-lock brakes, the performance, and reasonable fuel economy are the highlights of the new cars. The styling, simplicity, great ride, and raw aggressiveness are the charm of old muscle.
#23
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
A glance at my sig makes it obvious that I love both generations - enough to own both an auto and a manual in each. I daily drove 60's Pontiacs for years, but one day when I came close to rear-ending somebody, I made up my mind that I needed a modern car for daily driving. I'm with RPM WS6 - I could care less about gadgetry.
Anti-lock brakes, the performance, and reasonable fuel economy are the highlights of the new cars. The styling, simplicity, great ride, and raw aggressiveness are the charm of old muscle.
Anti-lock brakes, the performance, and reasonable fuel economy are the highlights of the new cars. The styling, simplicity, great ride, and raw aggressiveness are the charm of old muscle.
I can see people why people don't like the styling of the newer cars, but OMG the '98-'02 Trans Am is PERFECT. Every line was given the utmost attention to detail, it's possible the MOST aggressive looking T/A they ever made, I absolutely LOVE the look of that car.
#25
I couldn't choose. IMO the best car is one that combines everything together.
I 69' camaro or 70' chevelle with a ls7 or 454 lsx would be one of the best cars I could imagine.
The new school power along with old school looks? You can't beat it
I 69' camaro or 70' chevelle with a ls7 or 454 lsx would be one of the best cars I could imagine.
The new school power along with old school looks? You can't beat it
#26
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,317
Likes: 0
Received 1,751 Likes
on
1,251 Posts
I agree with RevGTO's statement about ABS (and larger disc brakes in general) being a welcome progression for a daily driver.
But truthfully the power 4-wheel drum brakes on my '71 aren't all that bad at surface street speeds in good weather. Modulation is noticeably different from disc setups, but it's something you get used to. Only time I really notice how inferior they are to modern brakes is at expressway speeds. When you drive an older car with older equipment, you just learn to adjust your habits - for example, I keep a greater distance between myself and the cars ahead of me. But there is no question that ABS is also a real plus in a daily driver when it comes to bad weather.
Styling wise, my personal opinion is that the best looking cars ever built were various GM products from 1966-73 and various Mopar products from 1968-74. I also greatly enjoy the simplicity of these cars and would not be interested in any sort of conversions to modern powertrain control electronics. To me, the simple old gasoline toilet bowl is part of the appeal.
But truthfully the power 4-wheel drum brakes on my '71 aren't all that bad at surface street speeds in good weather. Modulation is noticeably different from disc setups, but it's something you get used to. Only time I really notice how inferior they are to modern brakes is at expressway speeds. When you drive an older car with older equipment, you just learn to adjust your habits - for example, I keep a greater distance between myself and the cars ahead of me. But there is no question that ABS is also a real plus in a daily driver when it comes to bad weather.
Styling wise, my personal opinion is that the best looking cars ever built were various GM products from 1966-73 and various Mopar products from 1968-74. I also greatly enjoy the simplicity of these cars and would not be interested in any sort of conversions to modern powertrain control electronics. To me, the simple old gasoline toilet bowl is part of the appeal.
#27
Having owned mostly classic (Pontiac) muscle cars that eventually morphed from street cars into drag cars with Pontiac power, I definitely have a soft spot for them. I once told a buddy of mine that as far as I was concerned, the pinnacle of automotive styling was reached in 1969 with the Judge in Hugger orange (Carousel Red to Pontiac purists). As I rapidly approach my fifth decade of existence however, I decided to make the move to a more modern muscle platform. Just yesterday, as I was cruising in my 99 TA, I was thinking to myself why didn't I do this sooner. The smooth ride, the handling and the power 'leather' buckets were a welcome departure from the stark utilitarian interiors I had grown accustomed to, and it was definitely 'nice' to have a ballsy LS purring under the hood as well. Also, the thought of actually enjoying air conditioning on a 95 degree day is a welcome one. LOL
#28
Staging Lane
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: La Grande, OR
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#30
On The Tree
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My favorite is old muscle with new drivetrain/supension/etc. Old muscle just has a certain feel and draw to it, sound, looks, etc. I like driving new muscle( my 4th gens, vettes, brother has a 2012 boss), but everytime i hop in one of dads old cars, particularly his 70 396 SS Nova, it has a feel like no car from this era could ever have. I could sit and cruise in that thing for a whole Sunday afternoon. And the way the hoods and doors shut on a piece of old iron is second to none. Those were the real muscle cars.
#31
Launching!
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A few years ago in high school, I bought my 66 Pontiac, my first car. The classics have something that newer cars just don't have, soul. Recently I noticed during a friday night cruise on a deserted street that I was only doing 35 in a 40. I sped up to 40, then realized I was enjoying myself more going at the granny 35. lt1sport said it best, the old cars are REAL cars. Everything is so simple about them, and they have a certain elegance (even fire breathing big blocks) that no modern car can touch. Watch someone pull up in a 60's car, then in a modern LS. You'll see what I mean.
I do have a modern DD though, drum brakes honestly are outright dangerous in panic stops. But my DD is also 20 years old
This video sums it up pretty well. SPOILER: 69 Firebird
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...v=mDTRu4hXjp8#
I do have a modern DD though, drum brakes honestly are outright dangerous in panic stops. But my DD is also 20 years old
This video sums it up pretty well. SPOILER: 69 Firebird
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...v=mDTRu4hXjp8#
#32
TECH Regular
I turned 21 in 1971 and my first new car was a 1971 Boss 351 Mustang. Before that I also owned a 1967 GTO 400/4sp. That era was completly different than today. Gas was .35 but you only got 7mpg IF you kept your foot out of it. Those cars were rough, raw and aggressive. You knew when you were going 100 miles per hour. I am so glad I lived then (and lived to tell about it!). Having said that, I love my 2000 SS. In my opinion it is the closest thing to having the best of both worlds. I have modified it to where it feels rough and aggressive. Loud exhaust, solid MM's, very stiff suspension, light flywheel, gears, a little weight reduction, console delete, Mister gasket rubber shift boot, Hurst Billit w/chrome short stick and T-handle. It has some of the old school feel while also having new tech brakes, fuel injection, 20 mpg and sleek styling. 100 miles per hour feels like 70. I think we are reliving some of those old days except that back then a guy right out of high school could go to work at Chrysler and be able to afford just about any car he wanted. Not so today. In 1971 I made $8500/year and my Boss Mustang cost $3000. That's 35% of my salary. In 2000 I made $50,000 and my SS cost $30000, that's 60%. So relatively speaking I was better of back then. All you young guys today remember these times cause they won't last forever!!!
#33
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
A little background from me, I was born in 1992 so I missed pretty much all of the old school muscle car scene and barely missed the 93-02 f-bodies.
So I'm really happy to see these new muscle cars coming out, just because I missed a good portion of them
I'd personally vote New muscle, because I'm a geek that loves computers/video games and I gotta have those gadgets!
So I'm really happy to see these new muscle cars coming out, just because I missed a good portion of them
I'd personally vote New muscle, because I'm a geek that loves computers/video games and I gotta have those gadgets!
#34
On The Tree
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the 4th gen F-body is going to prove to be the last stop for a sort-of minimalist muscle car experience. Although the LS1 may be considered small and less powerful compared to GMs new LS engines, it still made fantastic power for the size and weight of the F-body.
Almost everything of consequence since around '02 has been terrible heavy, under-powered, or laden with gadgets, and I don't think that the weight or the gadgets will drop from here on out.
Consequently, I think that a "muscle car" or "sports car" will soon become a thing of the past, where you can only end up buying a "commuter car" which has mid-high power and is relatively affordable due to the high price for what it is (stemming from all the damned tech in them), or a "hyper car" that costs an outrageous amount of money stemming from the no-holds-barred engineering for all-out performance as well as the fancy gadgetry. There will be no "middle class" of cars soon enough.
Almost everything of consequence since around '02 has been terrible heavy, under-powered, or laden with gadgets, and I don't think that the weight or the gadgets will drop from here on out.
Consequently, I think that a "muscle car" or "sports car" will soon become a thing of the past, where you can only end up buying a "commuter car" which has mid-high power and is relatively affordable due to the high price for what it is (stemming from all the damned tech in them), or a "hyper car" that costs an outrageous amount of money stemming from the no-holds-barred engineering for all-out performance as well as the fancy gadgetry. There will be no "middle class" of cars soon enough.
#35
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,317
Likes: 0
Received 1,751 Likes
on
1,251 Posts
I think the 4th gen F-body is going to prove to be the last stop for a sort-of minimalist muscle car experience. Although the LS1 may be considered small and less powerful compared to GMs new LS engines, it still made fantastic power for the size and weight of the F-body.
Almost everything of consequence since around '02 has been terrible heavy, under-powered, or laden with gadgets, and I don't think that the weight or the gadgets will drop from here on out.
Consequently, I think that a "muscle car" or "sports car" will soon become a thing of the past, where you can only end up buying a "commuter car" which has mid-high power and is relatively affordable due to the high price for what it is (stemming from all the damned tech in them), or a "hyper car" that costs an outrageous amount of money stemming from the no-holds-barred engineering for all-out performance as well as the fancy gadgetry. There will be no "middle class" of cars soon enough.
Almost everything of consequence since around '02 has been terrible heavy, under-powered, or laden with gadgets, and I don't think that the weight or the gadgets will drop from here on out.
Consequently, I think that a "muscle car" or "sports car" will soon become a thing of the past, where you can only end up buying a "commuter car" which has mid-high power and is relatively affordable due to the high price for what it is (stemming from all the damned tech in them), or a "hyper car" that costs an outrageous amount of money stemming from the no-holds-barred engineering for all-out performance as well as the fancy gadgetry. There will be no "middle class" of cars soon enough.
The fact that the 4th gens were the "last stop" of sorts, is the reason why I still have two of them and will probably always have at least one. They were the last new cars to have somewhat of an old car soul. They were the last new car that I've been able to get really excited about.
There was a time when most items on a car were optional, so with a factory order sheet you could build something to suit your taste and budget...put the big engine in a stripped down car if you like, or add on a bunch of luxury options and fancy trim pieces while opting for the small engine if you didn't care about performance; or you could order all of the above. I understand that the pratice of standardization makes options more affordable on the whole, but unfortunatly this leaves some of us stuck with heavier, more complicated and more expensive junk that we don't want or need.
#36
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
I think the 4th gen F-body is going to prove to be the last stop for a sort-of minimalist muscle car experience. Although the LS1 may be considered small and less powerful compared to GMs new LS engines, it still made fantastic power for the size and weight of the F-body.
Almost everything of consequence since around '02 has been terrible heavy, under-powered, or laden with gadgets, and I don't think that the weight or the gadgets will drop from here on out.
Consequently, I think that a "muscle car" or "sports car" will soon become a thing of the past, where you can only end up buying a "commuter car" which has mid-high power and is relatively affordable due to the high price for what it is (stemming from all the damned tech in them), or a "hyper car" that costs an outrageous amount of money stemming from the no-holds-barred engineering for all-out performance as well as the fancy gadgetry. There will be no "middle class" of cars soon enough.
Almost everything of consequence since around '02 has been terrible heavy, under-powered, or laden with gadgets, and I don't think that the weight or the gadgets will drop from here on out.
Consequently, I think that a "muscle car" or "sports car" will soon become a thing of the past, where you can only end up buying a "commuter car" which has mid-high power and is relatively affordable due to the high price for what it is (stemming from all the damned tech in them), or a "hyper car" that costs an outrageous amount of money stemming from the no-holds-barred engineering for all-out performance as well as the fancy gadgetry. There will be no "middle class" of cars soon enough.
The last part, about being no middle class of cars, I'm a little confused on. Are you suggesting there won't be any "middle class" performance cars? Are you suggesting the Charger, Challenger, Camaro, and Mustang are going to disappear? Or rather that their prices will keep going up and will thus become unaffordable to the middle class?
Despite all the new gadgetry and amenities that these new muscle cars have, they still offer bang for your buck performance compared with most European cars, and the RWD nostalgia and spinning fun that no Japanese car can deliver. They handle almost on par with an M3 and get better fuel economy to boot.
#38
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
I didn't buy these cars brand new. But I'm pretty sure on Motor Trend 1998, the Camaro Z28 started off at around $21,000...for 350HP I'd consider that a good price.
#39
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,317
Likes: 0
Received 1,751 Likes
on
1,251 Posts
The last part, about being no middle class of cars, I'm a little confused on. Are you suggesting there won't be any "middle class" performance cars? Are you suggesting the Charger, Challenger, Camaro, and Mustang are going to disappear? Or rather that their prices will keep going up and will thus become unaffordable to the middle class?
I do agree that $20-22k was a good value for a ~350hp brand new car in 1998. The closest base price competition was Mustang GT, but that got you about 100hp less for your money. Having said that.....
Despite all the new gadgetry and amenities that these new muscle cars have, they still offer bang for your buck performance compared with most European cars, and the RWD nostalgia and spinning fun that no Japanese car can deliver. They handle almost on par with an M3 and get better fuel economy to boot.
Granted, some might argue that more options have become standard, etc., and hence the increase in base price. But that's exactly the point here....that the OEMs are going to cram options down your throat whether you want them or not. This pratice works because, as stated above, standardization of options brings the price of said options down on the whole, and *most* people seem to want their car to be more like a living room rather than a piece of machinery these days. Those of us that actually want something more simple are in the minority, and thus are forced to pay for this unwanted content and, in effect, subsidize the cost for everyone else.
#40
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
.....a quick search on Chevrolet.com reveals that the cheapest MSRP for an entry-level V8 Camaro in 2013 is $32,635. Compared to the $20,470 entry-level price in 1998, that's a 60% increase in MSRP over a 15 year period - and with only a modest increase in acceleration performance considering the amount of years inbetween (despite decent power gains, the weight increase has really held back the acceleration potential of an LS3 5th gen).
Granted, some might argue that more options have become standard, etc., and hence the increase in base price. But that's exactly the point here....that the OEMs are going to cram options down your throat whether you want them or not. This pratice works because, as stated above, standardization of options brings the price of said options down on the whole, and *most* people seem to want their car to be more like a living room rather than a piece of machinery these days. Those of us that actually want something more simple are in the minority, and thus are forced to pay for this unwanted content and, in effect, subsidize the cost for everyone else.
These new cars are SO loaded down, they don't even feel like a muscle car anymore. They feel more like a luxury car. But I guess the general population today isn't in for a car with few options and lacking amenities, as you said most people want their car to be an extension of their house, when that happens it holds back a car's true potential.