ToxicWS6

so ive been debating about giving my 2500HD some more go lately, has an LQ4 in it and im ether thinking doing 243 heads and like a 228 cam and headers or do a small turbo and run only like 6-8psi

which u think would be more eco friendly (not to worried about it but still)

which would be a better gain in power or more useable DD/towing power

any other input would be cool

i have some left over turbo stuff from when i did my car so the cost of the actual build im not worried about its more of the once its done aspect

Fry_

I'd go turbo if you think you can get it done for a reasonable price, I think a cam that size may trade off to much low end. Maybe post this on Performance Truck, you may get some more educated answers.

A.R. Shale Targa

iTrader: (2)

Turbo all day !! It's closer to 200 more ponies whereas the H/C would give at most 100-110. I would also think the mileage of the turbo is better as well.

Blackpanther99

iTrader: (8)

Turbo... Boost.

ToxicWS6

yeah i was leaning more towards turbo too, mainly cause i didnt wanna deal with another high stall converter if i did a cam

but this project just got put on a big hold cause i threw a piston through the block on my car thurs night so getting that going and finished took priority over boredom project with DD lol

ez2cdave

I don't speak "ECO-Friendly", unless I have to pass Emissions Testing.

A Turbo, with no other mods, sounds like the "Green" solution . . . A Cam and other mods would likely "step on the EPA's toes".

codyseals

Decisions decisions

rotomoto712

I would definitely do two small t3/t4 turbos with a .40-64 A/R, it will spool up insanely quick and you can get the turbos for about $200 each.

ToxicWS6

thats exactly what i was gunna do lol, probably pretty loud spool from each also