General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Older 5.7 or newer 5.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2018, 04:47 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
fakky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Older 5.7 or newer 5.3

Can get a 1998-2000 LS1 5.7 with trans for say $2800

Can get a 2015 5.3 with trans for say $2800


LS1 ~ 340HP

5.3 ~ 350 HP


LS1 has no DOD/VVT ...... and is a true LS

The newer 5.3 have quite good power.




Any pros/cons asides from this ? With the camshaft options these days .....

I though there was a problem with the earlier LS1's pre 2000 cant remmeber.
Has anyone done a newer swap - like a 2017 ?

thx
Old 03-26-2018, 10:44 AM
  #2  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
fakky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

also ....

Can you replace the 6l80e with the 4l80 easy enough ??
Anything required after from ECM reflash and tunnel mods ?


Old 03-26-2018, 11:48 AM
  #3  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

The 2015 5.3 will be a gen 5 with direction injection.
You can do a 4L80e but it will needs its own controller, or be converter to manual shift.
Old 03-26-2018, 04:13 PM
  #4  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
fakky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
The 2015 5.3 will be a gen 5 with direction injection.
You can do a 4L80e but it will needs its own controller, or be converter to manual shift.
So basically stick with the 6l80e and just modify tunnel.

Dont know anything about direction injection .......

Which way would you go joe ......


L83 or a older LS1.
Old 03-26-2018, 04:15 PM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
fakky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...-get-familiar/

The fuel is injected into the airstream at extremely high pressure. The result is an optimum swirl effect and improved cooling of the combustion chamber.


So basically like a high pressure fuel rail seen in diesels ?
Old 03-26-2018, 04:22 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

the newer 5.3 should have better rods .
Old 03-26-2018, 07:41 PM
  #7  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
fakky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by garygnu
the newer 5.3 should have better rods .
Wasnt really a problem on the 5.7 though was it ??
Really only looking to start as stock ...... you know how it goes after that but since its going in a 57 truck probably never over 500hp.

Inferring from your comment though you like 5.3 option better ?
Old 03-26-2018, 08:11 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,676
Received 157 Likes on 128 Posts

Default

personally im not a fan of direct injection due to "excessive" carbon buildup. many vw 2.0 tsi get so bad that it gets to a point where the valves can no longer fully close. it was a sub $1000 job for vw to perform a clean. one of the reasons we got ride of it. the motors are still too new to see if they will have similar issues
Old 03-26-2018, 11:09 PM
  #9  
Pontiacerator
iTrader: (12)
 
RevGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wichita KS / Rancho San Diego
Posts: 6,126
Received 194 Likes on 163 Posts

Default

What kind of vehicle is this going into? If it's a replacement for a 4th gen I'd definitely go with the LS1 for electronics compatibility.
Old 03-27-2018, 10:13 AM
  #10  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
pantera_efi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default LS Crankcase Strength

Hi Fakky, the "early" LS-1 GEN-III Crankcase is VERY WEAK.

There is a hole between the Main bulkhead AND Camshaft bulkhead of 1" designed for windage improvement.
This crankcase will CRANK between those two locations when HP/RPM is increased past OEM design.
The GM "stated" cylinder distortion problem created by two different head bolt lengths used is another reason I WILL NOT FIT an early Crankcase.

Lance
Old 03-27-2018, 07:51 PM
  #11  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
fakky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RevGTO
What kind of vehicle is this going into? If it's a replacement for a 4th gen I'd definitely go with the LS1 for electronics compatibility.
Hi

A 57 Chevy panel truck with IFS and 8.8 exploder rear swap.
Old 03-27-2018, 07:52 PM
  #12  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
fakky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pantera EFI
Hi Fakky, the "early" LS-1 GEN-III Crankcase is VERY WEAK.

There is a hole between the Main bulkhead AND Camshaft bulkhead of 1" designed for windage improvement.
This crankcase will CRANK between those two locations when HP/RPM is increased past OEM design.
The GM "stated" cylinder distortion problem created by two different head bolt lengths used is another reason I WILL NOT FIT an early Crankcase.

Lance
Thanks Lance


I'll start reading up on a few L83 swaps.

​​​​​i can do cheaper .... But there's a few of these floating around sub 30k miles
Old 03-28-2018, 08:14 AM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
R6cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 835
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fakky
Wasnt really a problem on the 5.7 though was it ??
Really only looking to start as stock ...... you know how it goes after that but since its going in a 57 truck probably never over 500hp.

Inferring from your comment though you like 5.3 option better ?
Originally Posted by Pantera EFI
Hi Fakky, the "early" LS-1 GEN-III Crankcase is VERY WEAK.

There is a hole between the Main bulkhead AND Camshaft bulkhead of 1" designed for windage improvement.
This crankcase will CRANK between those two locations when HP/RPM is increased past OEM design.
The GM "stated" cylinder distortion problem created by two different head bolt lengths used is another reason I WILL NOT FIT an early Crankcase.

Lance
OP, I wouldn't second guess or think anything Lance would say isn't factual. But, per the bolded text in your above post, I don't think his statement would be anything to worry about and wouldn't let that have much of a deciding factor in your case. If you're serious about no more than 500hp, you shouldn't be past the limits of an early LS1 block. You won't need to spin the motor much past 6,000 rpm, or at all, to get 500hp out of an LS1 block.
Old 03-28-2018, 08:55 AM
  #14  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
fakky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by R6cowboy
OP, I wouldn't second guess or think anything Lance would say isn't factual. But, per the bolded text in your above post, I don't think his statement would be anything to worry about and wouldn't let that have much of a deciding factor in your case. If you're serious about no more than 500hp, you shouldn't be past the limits of an early LS1 block. You won't need to spin the motor much past 6,000 rpm, or at all, to get 500hp out of an LS1 block.
Good point.

I think what I am gathering from this though is most guys here seem to like the newer variants over the older variants.

I'm sure one day I'll own a higher hp LS variant ..... But probably not in my DD 57 truck

So now just looking out for best deal .... If it's older so be it .... But the 350hp stock l83 sure looks interesting from a low mileage and HP perspective

Old 03-28-2018, 07:02 PM
  #15  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
fakky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone done a 2wd conversion using this kit ?

https://transmissioncenter.net/shop/6l80e-camaro-or-4wd-to-2wd-slip-yoke-conversion-kit/

Simple enough ?
Remove tranafercacse and trans tail housing... New shaft and seal .... Bolt back up ?
Old 03-29-2018, 01:23 PM
  #16  
TECH Regular
 
tberg725's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Michigan
Posts: 435
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

The issue in the pre 2000 ls1s was the rod bolts, sense you say you're not even shooting for over 500hp in the truck I would get the LS1 and be done with it then you dont gotta worry about the direct inj stuff and everything with the LS1 is easy and straight forward makes good power and if you maintain it properly it will run for a vary long time
Old 03-29-2018, 10:39 PM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,676
Received 157 Likes on 128 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tberg725
The issue in the pre 2000 ls1s was the rod bolts, sense you say you're not even shooting for over 500hp in the truck I would get the LS1 and be done with it then you dont gotta worry about the direct inj stuff and everything with the LS1 is easy and straight forward makes good power and if you maintain it properly it will run for a vary long time
this. and also as mentioned earlier, if this is going in an already ls equipped vehicle, it would be idiotic to put do the hassle of the lt conversion
Old 03-30-2018, 08:01 AM
  #18  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
fakky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fakky
Hi

A 57 Chevy panel truck with IFS and 8.8 exploder rear swap.

Originally Posted by Floorman279
this. and also as mentioned earlier, if this is going in an already ls equipped vehicle, it would be idiotic to put do the hassle of the lt conversion

Not sure if your in the wrong thread ? *shrug*


Seems hardest part now is finding a 2WD trans ....... I though the 4WD to 2wd conversion was easier than what it was. Seems like the output shaft is held in place with a snap ring/gear assembly ..... so requires full teardown.

Most guys talk about swapping tailhousings ...... but thats seems more to me for the VSS and physically housing the longer shaft once you remove the Transfer case adapter.
Old 03-30-2018, 07:51 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,676
Received 157 Likes on 128 Posts

Default

woops missed that
Old 03-31-2018, 03:21 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
2ToeRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Atlanta Ga,
Posts: 580
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Do the LS1 and 4L80 and kick it in the ***. There will be to much **** to change going with the newer 5.3, keep it simple



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 PM.