General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

traded in my 01 ss yesterday...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2007, 03:20 AM
  #21  
Banned
 
BLKWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BayAreaSS
Thats a good idea

But a stage 3 w/toys is definately not getting 30 mpg. Those SRT-4's dont get very good gas mileage from my experience with them.
My friend gets mid/high 20's in his and he is about 100whp past what a stage 3 could hope for.
Old 02-08-2007, 03:24 AM
  #22  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
BayAreaSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA (Pittsburg)
Posts: 4,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BLKWS.6
My friend gets mid/high 20's in his and he is about 100whp past what a stage 3 could hope for.
Wow thats pretty good.
Old 02-08-2007, 08:31 AM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BrandonDrecksage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central jersey, nj
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I was actually on my way to buy a srt4 and stopped at a chevy dealer first. The cobalt felt more put together. I'm also going to be auto-xing the car and didn't want the turbo lag, then unpredictable wheel spin when the turbo spools up. Plus the cobalt handles a lot better stock. last but not least........ cobalt giant gay wing>srt4 giant gay wing.
Old 02-08-2007, 09:12 AM
  #24  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1Formulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 2,709
Received 561 Likes on 445 Posts

Default

I would rather drive a beat up SS any day over a front wheel drive econobox. But to each their own.
Old 02-08-2007, 09:22 AM
  #25  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Finite1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well if you're happy, thats all that matters.

but suggesting an srt-4 should be mutiny.
Old 02-08-2007, 10:54 AM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BrandonDrecksage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central jersey, nj
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1Formulation
I would rather drive a beat up SS any day over a front wheel drive econobox. But to each their own.
the reason why i ditched the ss was because of driving it through the winter, it gets annoying with lots of hills and inclines and declines. to each there own, why post then? Its not like I was asking your opinion.
Old 02-08-2007, 10:55 AM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BrandonDrecksage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central jersey, nj
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Finite1
well if you're happy, thats all that matters.

but suggesting an srt-4 should be mutiny.
lol...there not bad cars, I just can't see myself spending that kind of money on something that has roll up windows in the back, it wouldn't be as bad if it had it in the front too. I just loved the power of the srt4, but am definatly happy with this, everyone should go test drive them, on the street its way more then enough.
Old 02-08-2007, 10:57 AM
  #28  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
jewbacca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Crappy Stupid Liberal Washington state
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BLKWS.6
..and a cavalier is somehow far supeior?
No, a cavalies is ugly too, but at least the Cobalt looks pretty good, has a nicer interior, and as stated is made by GM. SRT4's just don't seem as cool. Maby if it was a two door. And yes I know, Evo's and STI's have four doors, but they seem to pull it off better in the looks department. But this is just all my own opinion.
Old 02-08-2007, 11:45 AM
  #29  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
JKDZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Glad your happy with your purchase.

Cobalt SS/SC sounds like a real nice car.
However, I would have went with the SRT-4. I love them.

Anyways, enjoy your car... keep us posted over time.
Old 02-08-2007, 12:09 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
BLKWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrandonDrecksage
I was actually on my way to buy a srt4 and stopped at a chevy dealer first. The cobalt felt more put together. I'm also going to be auto-xing the car and didn't want the turbo lag, then unpredictable wheel spin when the turbo spools up. Plus the cobalt handles a lot better stock. last but not least........ cobalt giant gay wing>srt4 giant gay wing.
My friend races SCCA and does extremely well in his big-turbo SRT. By the numbers an SRT4 handles VERY COMPARABLE to an S2k.
Old 02-08-2007, 12:23 PM
  #31  
Banned
 
BLKWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jewbacca
No, a cavalies is ugly too, but at least the Cobalt looks pretty good, has a nicer interior, and as stated is made by GM. SRT4's just don't seem as cool. Maby if it was a two door. And yes I know, Evo's and STI's have four doors, but they seem to pull it off better in the looks department. But this is just all my own opinion.

Quafe diff.
Tokico struts (Illuma 5-way on the ACR model)
Sachs clutch
Auto-meter guages (which my friend verefied with his live-display tuning software to be DEAD ON).

ect. ect.

The SRT4 is basically an aftermarket creation put togather by SRT.
Old 02-08-2007, 01:09 PM
  #32  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
MARKSZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: bama bitch
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i woulndt have traded the ss but as long as your happy its all good
Old 02-08-2007, 01:22 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
 
TORK?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Heck, I'd do it: decent fuel economy, good looks, and good performance. I haven't driven one, but they look like fun little cars. Not to mention the hassle free living of a 10k mile 1 y/o car vs 100k mile 6 y/o. Decent feul economy, good looks, good performance. Sounds like a good pick up!
Old 02-08-2007, 01:25 PM
  #34  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
jewbacca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Crappy Stupid Liberal Washington state
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BLKWS.6
Quafe diff.
Tokico struts (Illuma 5-way on the ACR model)
Sachs clutch
Auto-meter guages (which my friend verefied with his live-display tuning software to be DEAD ON).

ect. ect.

The SRT4 is basically an aftermarket creation put togather by SRT.
Oh yeah, don't get me wrong, the parts on them are awesome. But I can't get passed the fact that it's a neon, but thats just me.
Old 02-08-2007, 01:34 PM
  #35  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
PLucas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I test drove a cobalt ss and it felt way slower than my camaro. Its a very nice car though
Old 02-08-2007, 05:14 PM
  #36  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
QuickT/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Battle Creek MI
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

CobaltSS > SRT-4
Looks better, can be made just as fast as a neon can, 2 door, not a Mopar
Old 02-08-2007, 05:25 PM
  #37  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
97blkz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,125
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Your SS must have been a turd? I can't see a cobalt being as fast as a good running stocl ls1 (ps I'm no ls1 fan). I do however hope you enjoy it.
Old 02-08-2007, 05:34 PM
  #38  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Finite1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BrandonDrecksage
lol...there not bad cars, I just can't see myself spending that kind of money on something that has roll up windows in the back, it wouldn't be as bad if it had it in the front too. I just loved the power of the srt4, but am definatly happy with this, everyone should go test drive them, on the street its way more then enough.
The 08' caliber srt-4 is 300hp/260t and doesn't look too bad.

less neon looking.
Old 02-08-2007, 05:46 PM
  #39  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,252
Likes: 0
Received 1,685 Likes on 1,207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BrandonDrecksage
these cars tend to trap high 90s... not far off from a stock fbody.
high 90s compared to 104-106mph (common stock trap speeds for an LS1) are not even close in terms of SOTP feel. My TPI car trapped in the high 90s, it felt dirt slow for the second half of a 1/4 mile compared to a stock LS1.

Either way, the Cobalt SS/SC is a pretty cool little car, if you're into that. Main thing is, it's a GM. Big plus in my book. Have fun, that's what it's all about.
Old 02-08-2007, 06:46 PM
  #40  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (75)
 
CJDZ24_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South Jersey (15 miles from Atlantic City)
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I would of brought one and kept my SS. If I had to live with only 1 car and it was fwd I would go crazy. I'm glad you got a good trade in amount for your SS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 AM.