Old school Vs. New
#21
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 32,395
Likes: 1,818
From: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Originally Posted by whytryz28
Well id HAVE to agree with your dad on mostly everything haha. I know for a fact that the 4l60e transmissions will not hold up not a high stall for a long period of time, ive seen many burn the clutch packs insides, while the turbop 350 and 400s can handle a stall for years to come
4L60E is a pretty good stock OD trans, IMO.
#22
There are trade-offs in everything you do. Personally in the last year I sold all my old mopars (72 Challenger, 72 Cuda, 69 Charger) in order to free up some additional investment money & buy a more practical car (99 WS6). It is all about what you can afford, put time into & enjoy based on your current situation. About the pure stocks, they are not good representation on what a stock car back in the day could do. They are however a good representation of what a pile of stock parts, a machine shop (as long as your not going for extra cubes, rules do not allow this), some ingenuity & alot of good tuning on the fly is capable of. Here is a quick video of bob k's 70 Hemi Cuda vs. (I cant remember the guys name's) ZL1 camaro
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...54877617782806
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...54877617782806
Last edited by speedfreak440; 03-06-2007 at 07:35 AM. Reason: fixed link
#23
Originally Posted by RPM WS6
I've seen many stock 4L60Es go 10s of thousands of miles with ~3500 stall TCs.
4L60E is a pretty good stock OD trans, IMO.
4L60E is a pretty good stock OD trans, IMO.
There good transmissions no doubt about it, but they cant handle near the same amount of torque the 350s can....but just think of this, why do most Ls1 drag cars have turbo 350 or 400s in them?? haha
but i wouldnt mind having another gear in my tranny to spare some gas mileage lol
#24
Originally Posted by speedfreak440
There are trade-offs in everything you do. Personally in the last year I sold all my old mopars (72 Challenger, 72 Cuda, 69 Charger) in order to free up some additional investment money & buy a more practical car (99 WS6). It is all about what you can afford, put time into & enjoy based on your current situation. About the pure stocks, they are not good representation on what a stock car back in the day could do. They are however a good representation of what a pile of stock parts, a machine shop (as long as your not going for extra cubes, rules do not allow this), some ingenuity & alot of good tuning on the fly is capable of. Here is a quick video of bob k's 70 Hemi Cuda vs. (I cant remember the guys name's) ZL1 camaro
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...54877617782806
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...54877617782806
I saw those races, amazing the potential 40 year old technology can do with very little changes to it.
#25
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 32,395
Likes: 1,818
From: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Originally Posted by whytryz28
There good transmissions no doubt about it, but they cant handle near the same amount of torque the 350s can....but just think of this, why do most Ls1 drag cars have turbo 350 or 400s in them?? haha
but i wouldnt mind having another gear in my tranny to spare some gas mileage lol
but i wouldnt mind having another gear in my tranny to spare some gas mileage lol
#26
Originally Posted by silent102
As far as the tune, They have carb's so there is no stock tune and yes pure stock drags alow you to tune the car and build the engine to stock factory specifications. Eather way it weighes 3500 pounds and is running low 12's. With drag radials, its in the 11's. Acording to OLD dyno numbers the challenger put out 489RWHP and 671 torque.
No stock Tune ? Carbs can be upjetted and distributors can be recurved. And Factory tunes are far from optimal on any Car.
#27
Yea with those Pure stock cars, theyre certain rule about rebuilding the engine, there allowed higher ramp cams, but no over boring, stock carbs that can be jetted higher and distributors that you can recurve, but even with those little changes there able to break into the low 11s, i havent seen any ls1 camaros break into low 11s with just a cam swap and nothing more on stock tires.
and all in all old school costs less to make more power...its just there drivablility is really crappy lol
and all in all old school costs less to make more power...its just there drivablility is really crappy lol
#28
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 32,395
Likes: 1,818
From: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Originally Posted by whytryz28
Yea with those Pure stock cars, theyre certain rule about rebuilding the engine, there allowed higher ramp cams, but no over boring, stock carbs that can be jetted higher and distributors that you can recurve, but even with those little changes there able to break into the low 11s, i havent seen any ls1 camaros break into low 11s with just a cam swap and nothing more on stock tires.
That's like taking an LS1, putting in a bigger cam, bigger injectors, and doing a custom PCM tune.
Not "stock" at all, IMO.
#29
LMAO at this thread...To this day, the fastest pure stocker that Hot Rod Magazine tested (in 1970), was a 428CJ Mach 1. It ran 13.56 show room stock. I just saw (2 weeks ago) on the Speed Channel, a test of 6 of the fastest muscle cars made (yes, even a Hemi), and only 2 broke into the 13's, and none could stop! Only the full-on-race ZL1 cars and Hemi's of the same ilk, can run anything resembling 11's...and that's un-corked, slicks, and with suspension mods.
#30
Originally Posted by whytryz28
and LS1w66 the fastest pure stock car was an L88 vette on Bias-ply tires!! haha amazing huh ran low 11's so just cause its old school stock doesnt mean its not fast Besides just look at the full body mopar running a 426 factory hemi that snapped into the 10s on stock trim theres tons of old school cars that would be more then enough to handle for these up to date technology cars we have now, i mean sure they get better mpg and have a/c but i just dont get the same thrill driving my friends 94 z28 as i do with my 69 ss
L88 Vettes are few and far between they probably made 600 HP but running low 11's On a Bias ply seems hard to believe Biasply slick thats another thing though Again a factory Street Mopar that hits 10's NOT possible. Race Hemi Maybe but Race Hemi and street Hemi is 2 different set ups
#32
Those arent BS numbers HotRod mad held the event and 1 corvette went 11s in "somewhat" of a stock trim, it had dual holley 650s which were available on L88 vettes, and yes your correct it wasnt on bias, it went low 13s high 12s spinning mid track with bias tires, Mikeys were used to make the 11 second run
#33
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 32,395
Likes: 1,818
From: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Originally Posted by whytryz28
1 corvette went 11s in "somewhat" of a stock trim
#34
Thats true but theres no point in having power if you cant get it to the ground, The quickest F.A.S.T. car right now is a '68 L88 Vette, first FAST car in the 10's.....He went a 1.68 60ft on Bias Plys...... i dont know how you do that...
#35
The previous owner of my car did his mods with the assumption the 4L60E would hold up. After dyno tuning the torque management out it started to slip and a few nitrous passes later catastrophic failure! So you can defnitely get one to fail with abuse, which is one of the reasons they have torque management. But nothing a built 4L60E won't fix!
#37
Originally Posted by germeezy1
The 69 ZL-1 Vette actually clicked off a 10.89 bone stock except for M & H dragmaster slicks.
Yes sir but like every car, add slicks knock off 1 second high 12s is what there capapble of with those crappy bias ply tires.
#40
Originally Posted by BLKWS.6
I bet you are a closet Honda owner arent you?
1971 Chevrolet C10 327/manual
1996 Chevrolet Silverado Lift/Superswampers
1999 Pontiac Grand Prix GT--the wife's
2001 Camaro Z28 M6
2007 Harley Davidson Night Train
Doesn't get much more American than that.