General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Pony boys are up to no good again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2007, 07:56 PM
  #21  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
BayAreaSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA (Pittsburg)
Posts: 4,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Wow! Talk about a bunch of stupid post.

They obviously dont know much over there
BayAreaSS is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 08:19 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
AronZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I'd never own a stang because I hate how you sit and the shifter placement sucks *****.(Ford's automatics suck, so I wouldn't buy one of those either). Honestly I feel like my hand is going to go through the dash when I drive one.
AronZ28 is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 08:23 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
SmaknaSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BananaHead
To everyone that says that the GM interiors are crap...sit in a Mach 1. I almost thought about getting one (it was red, 6k miles, for 19k), that is until I saw the interior. YUCK. I love the interior of my Camaro. It's not cheap at all. My Monsoon stereo sounds ******* awesome, my dash lights nice and bright, steering wheel controls, leather. What's cheap about that? Because it doesn't have wood paneling hand carved from California redwoods that are grown specifically for GM? I just hate when people have to stoop so low that they pick on things like "you sit too low" and "the windshield is too long". WTF kind of argument is that?!
+1 here. I get nothing but complements on the interior of my car. Having leather seats, leather side door panels,leather wrapped streering wheel,shifter ect must really suck I guess.
SmaknaSS is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 08:39 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
2000badbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

pony boys up to no good again............what else is new
2000badbird is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 09:05 PM
  #25  
Staging Lane
 
Mr1970Chevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Flint, Michigan (Yeah, the little "F" you might find on your VIN)
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I tend to see a lot of people putting LS1's in their Mustangs... why don't I see many people putting 5.0's or 4.6's in their F-Bodys?

Hmmm......
Mr1970Chevelle is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 09:28 PM
  #26  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Rob98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by StoleIt
Don't go starting any wars. Everyone has their opinion.

But, anyone who thinks a stock 4v can beat a stock Ls1 is on crack. The Mach1 gets close, but the Ls1 should always pull ahead.

I had a chance to run a lightly modded one (mach) from a roll, and yes I did roll away from him quite nicely!
Rob98LS1 is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 11:07 PM
  #27  
Teching In
 
Rossi17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"Yes we know your ls1s are spanking gt mustangs and older Cobras already. Unfortunately for you chevy mullit boys their has been a new sheriff in town for awhile called the Terminator spanking that a** stock for stock since 03. And isn't their two new stangs waxing your a** called the Shelby Gt 500 and Roush stang."

LOL! This post is great. Those GT 500s and Roushs shure be spanking us boiys. I wonder if he realizes that they cost x2 as much.
Rossi17 is offline  
Old 03-28-2007, 12:04 AM
  #28  
((((((Administrator))))))
 
CRAGER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 29,404
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We don't need board-wars going on.
CRAGER is offline  




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.