faster different mustang?
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Macungie, PA
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/20/a...-for-12-20-07/ i truly have no comment. what do you guys think?
#3
11 Second Club
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pusan, ROK
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
2000 torque, 600 hp and only a 1575 rpm redline... maybe this isn't something that would be best in a sports car, sounds more like it should be hauling heavy loads, that would be some crazy stain and gearing to be practical in a car I'd imagine
Plus wonder what the weight is on it with all those batteries and two motors. I don't think I'll think too much on it until I see stuff like that driving around.
Also think about what you could have done to your car for $80,000-$100,000. It'd have more than 300-600 hp that's for sure.
p.s. I just noticed that the article said that the 300 hp version will get over 200 mph top speed with gearing. I'd like to see how they can do that.
Plus wonder what the weight is on it with all those batteries and two motors. I don't think I'll think too much on it until I see stuff like that driving around.
Also think about what you could have done to your car for $80,000-$100,000. It'd have more than 300-600 hp that's for sure.
p.s. I just noticed that the article said that the 300 hp version will get over 200 mph top speed with gearing. I'd like to see how they can do that.
Last edited by LrngCrv; 12-26-2007 at 02:24 AM.