General Maintenance & Repairs Leaks | Squeaks | Clunks | Rattles | Grinds

The New Seafoam??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2009, 05:27 PM
  #21  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
vr4rhoads's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah i was reading it right thats what i was think it was 42 degree's we compared the tune it had with a stock tune and it had 99 differences.
Old 08-01-2009, 05:36 PM
  #22  
TECH Resident
 
BSmiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In the moment...
Posts: 869
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1Fury!
Must have been sprayin a 300 shot or something
Way to go being uneducated. One more serious reason to run that much timing would be running race gas. Or trying to extract just that much more hp out of a stock motor.
Old 08-01-2009, 10:38 PM
  #23  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
SpinsB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

is seafoming or any top end cleaner a bad idea for a none stock motor or stroked motor?
Old 08-01-2009, 11:51 PM
  #24  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SpinsB
is seafoming or any top end cleaner a bad idea for a none stock motor or stroked motor?
It works on any motor.

My 427ci LOVED when I cleaned it out after 118,000 miles. Totally changed the way it accelerates and idles.

Just know if you use Sea Foam you will only be cleaning 3-4 cylinders at the most....and almost NONE of the intake and really none of the valves and runners in the heads.

Mopar...........................

.
Old 08-02-2009, 12:37 AM
  #25  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Broslowski
Oh no wait til cholate taco hear about this. he's an epic god of the seafoam write up.

Now how the **** do you compare the two? I've taken 90k intakes off that looked like the one posted earlier. You need to pull the **** apart, look, put it back together, treat it, and pull it back apart. ******* idiots, oh the seafoam smokes more so it's better. wat the ****.

Pour liquid into the intake huh, big bashing on me for saying that was a bad idea. Now a year later what are we all going to do agree that it is a bad idea and I was right? oh no.

walmart stocks seafoam now, put that on the wifes grocery list.
Sea Foam is great for alot of things....but its horrible for top end cleaning. Liquid simply doesn't do a complete job, not even close.

Gotta have FOAM.

.
Old 08-02-2009, 11:27 AM
  #26  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
SpinsB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
It works on any motor.

My 427ci LOVED when I cleaned it out after 118,000 miles. Totally changed the way it accelerates and idles.

Just know if you use Sea Foam you will only be cleaning 3-4 cylinders at the most....and almost NONE of the intake and really none of the valves and runners in the heads.

Mopar...........................

.
what about my 427ci that has around 4-5000 miles but is using alot of oil and Ive had the intake off and it was caked with oil along with the heads. Would it be ok to use to clean things up? This winter getting new valve stems and a catch can system. Just looking to clean things up while summer is still here.
Old 08-02-2009, 02:16 PM
  #27  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SpinsB
what about my 427ci that has around 4-5000 miles but is using alot of oil and Ive had the intake off and it was caked with oil along with the heads. Would it be ok to use to clean things up? This winter getting new valve stems and a catch can system. Just looking to clean things up while summer is still here.
You need to search for a rpoblem with the engine...if you're burning excessive oil with only 4500 miles on it, there's a problem. If the runners in your heads are caked with oil I would think you have bad valve seals in your heads. The other really bad possibility is that you could have gas washed your rings at break in..IF it was tuned a little rich, and that would require a rebuild.

Sure, the Mopar stuff would clean alot of that **** out of there bigtime. But there's something wrong.

When you cruise at a steady 50 mph, then nail the pedal to the floor, do you leave a trail of smoke for just a couple seconds, then it clears up as you continue to accelerate?

Or maybe do you leave a constant trail while accelerating the whole time?


.
Old 08-02-2009, 08:54 PM
  #28  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
SpinsB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Last summer I had a commpression test done and all #'s came back good. So I have been lead to beleive that the valve seals and maybe valve guides are bad. I would have to look next time to see what I leave behind when I get on it. I know it leaves a trail of smoke just not sure if it stops and keeps going. Got white smoke for a min on cold start but goes away. I have plans to pull the heads here in a month or two and send them out to have them looked at.
Old 08-02-2009, 09:43 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Z Fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,595
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

So the Mopar **** works - any results from the GM version?
Old 08-02-2009, 09:46 PM
  #30  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SpinsB
Last summer I had a commpression test done and all #'s came back good. So I have been lead to beleive that the valve seals and maybe valve guides are bad. I would have to look next time to see what I leave behind when I get on it. I know it leaves a trail of smoke just not sure if it stops and keeps going. Got white smoke for a min on cold start but goes away. I have plans to pull the heads here in a month or two and send them out to have them looked at.
A little bit on start up is normal. Forged pistons expand as the engine warms up for a couple minutes making them and the rings tighter against the cylinder walls. Cast pistons don't expand as much and are always tight when cold or hot.

I was told by a very reputable builder, perhaps the best, that its very bad to just pull out and start driving immediately after start-up, especially with a forged set of pistons. Because they actually are not yet tight in the cylinder and actually move around. Obviously they move a tiny tiny amount, but enough that you'll wear them prematurely if you don't let them warm up for a couple minutes. One of the reasons the C6 Z06 427ci has cast pistons...so it can pass cold start emmissions easier.


.
Old 08-02-2009, 09:47 PM
  #31  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z Fury
So the Mopar **** works - any results from the GM version?
Mopar stuff is crazy good. Never tried the GM stuff. If its not a FOAM like Mopar, that expands, it can't work as good. The key to it all is the expanding foam.


.
Old 08-02-2009, 10:29 PM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
bballr4567's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Dealership here was sold out of it yesterday. They might get another shipment in tomorrow though.
Old 08-03-2009, 08:09 AM
  #33  
Save the manuals!
iTrader: (5)
 
wssix99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 12,745
Received 349 Likes on 319 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z Fury
So the Mopar **** works - any results from the GM version?
I didn't do the GM version but did go with a MotorVac treatment. http://www.motorvac.com/specs/CarbonClean_MCS245.pdf (The MotorVac uses a liquid, a foamer, and special equipment that re-circulates the solution through the fuel system with the engine off and then injects it back in with the engine on. I liked it better than the GM-recommended system/tools at the time, which do not re-circulate or de-varnish the fuel rails.)

With the MotorVac treatment, I measured a 2.5-3 mpg gain highway/city and have much faster engine starts.
Old 08-03-2009, 08:17 AM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Z Fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,595
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
Mopar stuff is crazy good. Never tried the GM stuff. If its not a FOAM like Mopar, that expands, it can't work as good. The key to it all is the expanding foam.
Gotcha. I wasn't aware that GM was a non-foaming liquid. That would make the Mopar stuff the winner of this round. Thanks for the info.

Originally Posted by wssix99
I didn't do the GM version but did go with a MotorVac treatment. http://www.motorvac.com/specs/CarbonClean_MCS245.pdf (The MotorVac uses a liquid, a foamer, and special equipment that re-circulates the solution through the fuel system with the engine off and then injects it back in with the engine on. I liked it better than the GM-recommended system/tools at the time, which do not re-circulate or de-varnish the fuel rails.)

With the MotorVac treatment, I measured a 2.5-3 mpg gain highway/city and have much faster engine starts.
That looks pretty intense. What are the costs for this setup?
Old 08-03-2009, 09:50 AM
  #35  
Save the manuals!
iTrader: (5)
 
wssix99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 12,745
Received 349 Likes on 319 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z Fury
Gotcha. I wasn't aware that GM was a non-foaming liquid. That would make the Mopar stuff the winner of this round. Thanks for the info.


That looks pretty intense. What are the costs for this setup?
Several thousand dollars, I believe. Snap-On re-sells the stuff and also markets it under its own brand.

I had the service done at a garage, which had the machine, and it cost me around $100. Its more expensive than a do-it-yourself treatment, but I was in-and-out in less than an hour, was hands-off, and didn't have any lingering effects after leaving the garage. (All the cleaners were worked out of the system.)
Old 08-03-2009, 09:59 AM
  #36  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
LS14EVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fenton, MI
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow, mopar helping out for once.
Old 08-03-2009, 01:41 PM
  #37  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z Fury
Gotcha. I wasn't aware that GM was a non-foaming liquid. That would make the Mopar stuff the winner of this round. Thanks for the info.

I don't know if the GM stuff is a foam, I;m just saying if it's not a foam, it won't work that well.


.
Old 08-03-2009, 01:44 PM
  #38  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wssix99
I didn't do the GM version but did go with a MotorVac treatment. http://www.motorvac.com/specs/CarbonClean_MCS245.pdf (The MotorVac uses a liquid, a foamer, and special equipment that re-circulates the solution through the fuel system with the engine off and then injects it back in with the engine on. I liked it better than the GM-recommended system/tools at the time, which do not re-circulate or de-varnish the fuel rails.)
Pretty cool system. What did they charge you for the process?

Did they let the foam sit for 45 minutes to soak into the grime and break it up? Or do they just run it through the idling engine?

Also, how does it clean the fuel lines from the gas tank to the rails? Do they remove the fuel injectors to clean them? I'm wondering how they run fuel cleaner through the fuel injectors without filling up the cylinders with fluid after the cleaner runs through them to clean them?

I like to keep my entire fuel system clean with an entire can of Sea Foam into 1/4 - 1/2 tank of gas every 3-4 months. It cleans everything from the fuel pump to the injectors and all lines inbetween.


.

Last edited by LS6427; 08-03-2009 at 02:12 PM.
Old 08-03-2009, 03:30 PM
  #39  
Save the manuals!
iTrader: (5)
 
wssix99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 12,745
Received 349 Likes on 319 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
Pretty cool system. What did they charge you for the process?

Did they let the foam sit for 45 minutes to soak into the grime and break it up? Or do they just run it through the idling engine?

Also, how does it clean the fuel lines from the gas tank to the rails? Do they remove the fuel injectors to clean them? I'm wondering how they run fuel cleaner through the fuel injectors without filling up the cylinders with fluid after the cleaner runs through them to clean them?

I like to keep my entire fuel system clean with an entire can of Sea Foam into 1/4 - 1/2 tank of gas every 3-4 months. It cleans everything from the fuel pump to the injectors and all lines inbetween.


.
Different shops will charge different amounts for the service, but I paid around $100-$125. I forget the actual process, but it takes around 1 hr. and there are times where they let the chemicals sit in the fuel rails and soak.

If I recall correctly, they put the cleaners in to the machine and then hook it up to the fuel rails. It then sucks gas from your gas tank in to the machine, (you can see the tank opening on the front) which it uses to dilute/mix the chemicals. That mix is then circulated around the rails and then used for the burn phase (with the engine on) where its sent through the injectors and to the cylinders. (Its supposed to clean the injectors in place through that last phase.) It does not clean anything from the tank to the rails.

Here's the company's instruction video, which shows additional details and the full proceedure (get out the popcorn! - its 26 min. long): http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...motorvac&hl=en
Old 08-15-2009, 03:21 PM
  #40  
On The Tree
 
Hawk777th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can you just pull off your maf and spray it in TB? Or how do you duct it in most cars wont run with out the maf connected. Is it safe to spray through maf? Just bought some and wonderd whats the best way to spray it in. I saw someone pull off that bottom tube on the intake manifold do u just pull and it comes off?

Last edited by Hawk777th; 08-15-2009 at 03:33 PM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 AM.