thermostat
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Chesterton, Indiana
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thermostat
Is it better to go with a 160 degree thermostat compared to a 180 degree stat? Are there any benefits to switching to a 160 degree stat? If so is it just plug and play or are there any other adjustments needed? thanks in advance.
#2
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
16 Posts
I chose the 160 stat because I think it's the best choice for me. Not to cold, but just right. You'll want to have the fans reprogrammed to take full advantage as well
#3
typically people install a 160 stat so the PCM can then be tuned to have more timing thus more HP if running at a lower operating temp. Putting one in alone would not really do much other than open at 160 vs 185 degrees but if the fans are still stock on/off temp settings they will still come on & go off at those settings
#6
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,362
Likes: 0
Received 1,794 Likes
on
1,278 Posts
There is no benefit for a stock vehicle. And the benefit is debatable even for modified examples, depending on the degree and type of modifications (there is a ton of reading on this, you can investigate and decide for yourself as not everyone agrees).
Regardless, as mentioned above, you would need to reprogram the fans to get the full effect of this change.
Regardless, as mentioned above, you would need to reprogram the fans to get the full effect of this change.
#8
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
16 Posts
I agree on a stock setup it's not worth it. For a heads and cam high compression like mine it definitely was. We were able to add another degree of timing with no knock. Whereas before with the stock thermostat we could not
#9
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Chesterton, Indiana
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my car is a 2002 camaro with prc head, mild cam,long tube headers with true duel exhaust with no cats. ls7 lifters, cold air intake. lowering springs with lower control arms with relocation brackets. ls7 clutch. upgraded fuel pump. I might be missing something not sure. I'm pushing about 420hp at the rear tires. i figured i would benefit with doing this. but Man thanks for all the input.
#10
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,362
Likes: 0
Received 1,794 Likes
on
1,278 Posts
my car is a 2002 camaro with prc head, mild cam,long tube headers with true duel exhaust with no cats. ls7 lifters, cold air intake. lowering springs with lower control arms with relocation brackets. ls7 clutch. upgraded fuel pump. I might be missing something not sure. I'm pushing about 420hp at the rear tires. i figured i would benefit with doing this. but Man thanks for all the input.
All of my stock compression, NA LS1s with nylon intakes have usually performed best with 180°-187° t-stats and fan settings that keep coolant temps in the 190°-205° range (both stock and non-stock cam).