LS6 now or 90/90 later?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 8, 2008 | 06:10 PM

#21

adam02gt

On The Tree

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 189

Likes: 0

From: desoto, tx

Quote:

Originally Posted by slt200mph

It produced 17 hp on my car...but dyno graph is long gone..I did it 5 years ago..it was my first mod..the car was bone stock with just the addition of the Z06 intake...

Was the midrange improved at all?

Nov 8, 2008 | 06:27 PM

#22

Slvr00Bird

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jan 2007

Posts: 1,419

Likes: 0

From: Ashland & Lexington, KY

I say LS6 unless you're going to be pushing out more than 450-500rwhp.. Price difference just isn't worth it otherwise and since you already said you won't do anything else to it for atleast a year, I don't see why not the LS6

Nov 9, 2008 | 08:32 AM

#23

slt200mph

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (42)

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 7,067

Likes: 9

From: HOT'LANA, GAWJA

Quote:

Originally Posted by adam02gt

Was the midrange improved at all?

Yes there were improvments all through the power band

Nov 9, 2008 | 12:48 PM

#24

LS1-450

TECH Junkie

iTrader: (33)

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 3,783

Likes: 9

Quote:

Originally Posted by SSickLS1

Just need some reassurance

The LS6 intake is & will always be the best bang for the buck on street cars reving up to 6300 RPM. There are several of us on this site whom continue to use it even after head/cam modifications.

You can't go wrong with the LS6.

Reply Subscribe

Reply Share

First
Prev
2 / 2
Next
Last