Crossover for fuel rails in back or front of intake?
01-09-2009, 08:57 AM
#1
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Deerfield Beach, FL
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Crossover for fuel rails in back or front of intake? Does it make a difference, is it better one way or the other? I noticed lately i've seen a lot of people with the crossover at the back and feed at the front and was just wondering if there was a reason for it, thanks guys!
01-09-2009, 10:29 PM
#6
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Deerfield Beach, FL
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I originally had it in the front and then put it in the back just recently when I was trying to fix a problem I had and wanted to rule something out and just wanted to ask if it was ok to leave it like that, that's why I made this post, cuz i've actually since then noticed a lot of pictures with people with it in the back.
01-10-2009, 09:20 AM
#7
I put mine in the back too, clears the sending unit by far. I figured with my cross-over in the back:
1. It hides the clutter,
2. Its more likely that I'll be dis-connecting the fuel line attachment itself rather than the cross-over. Having the fuel line in front makes it easy to remove.
3. It leaves the plugged end of the rail in front, so it's easy to add a gauge, sensor or other accessory if I wanted one day.
1. It hides the clutter,
2. Its more likely that I'll be dis-connecting the fuel line attachment itself rather than the cross-over. Having the fuel line in front makes it easy to remove.
3. It leaves the plugged end of the rail in front, so it's easy to add a gauge, sensor or other accessory if I wanted one day.
