Typhoon intake?
I don't know that test was done on a h/c car, i dout results would be worth the money on a bolt-on car...
http://www.professional-products.com...ests/52060.pdf
http://www.professional-products.com...ests/52060.pdf
I don't know that test was done on a h/c car, i dout results would be worth the money on a bolt-on car...
http://www.professional-products.com...ests/52060.pdf
http://www.professional-products.com...ests/52060.pdf
People don't talk too much about it because it is made out of alluminum and they fear the dreaded heat soak. I have not had any issues to bitch about since the day it was installed. If you do back to back runs at the track, heat soak might be a problem. But on the street, it is no worse then a Composite intake
They won't give you as much Power as a FAST but for Under $500.00 including Fuel Rails and Braided lines , it is a pretty good deal.
People don't talk too much about it because it is made out of alluminum and they fear the dreaded heat soak. I have not had any issues to bitch about since the day it was installed. If you do back to back runs at the track, heat soak might be a problem. But on the street, it is no worse then a Composite intake
People don't talk too much about it because it is made out of alluminum and they fear the dreaded heat soak. I have not had any issues to bitch about since the day it was installed. If you do back to back runs at the track, heat soak might be a problem. But on the street, it is no worse then a Composite intake
My car has been on a Dyno. The shop that does my work uses a Mustang Loaded Chassis Dyno. These Dynos read lower then a free wheeling Dyno Jet.
Numbers before intake install were 379 RWHP & 401 RWTQ
After install the numbers were 397 RWHP & 429 RWTQ.
Numbers before intake install were 379 RWHP & 401 RWTQ
After install the numbers were 397 RWHP & 429 RWTQ.
Last edited by JJD49; Apr 5, 2009 at 01:13 PM.


