FAST 92mm Intake Vs FAST LSXR 102mm Intake... RESULTS INSIDE!!!
#82
TECH Regular
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was looking at swaping my heads to a set of LS3 heads. To help me decide, which intake is better a FAST 102mm ported by Ron for a LS3 or a FAST 102mm ported by Ron cathedral port??????
#83
-Tony
#84
TECH Regular
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah I guess my other questions is ' which top end set up is better flowing, the LS3 heads with a FAST 102mm or the catherdral heads that flow around 315 cfm's with FAST 102mm intake'?
#90
On The Tree
Would running the 102/102 combo w/ a stock MAF be a bad idea? Im not sure I need to step up to a 100 MM maf for my setup. I just don't want to create a bottle neck since my air intake is OTR style and can support the air flow.
#94
I would really like to see the results of a larger stroker, ported 92mm fast vs. a ported 102mm fast. I've got the 92mm on my 447 right now and have been curious for a while now if there is much on the table going to the new fast intake. As it stands, I'm at 589rwhp, I'm curious if the new intake could push it over 600.
#95
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I could've sworn that there was a 440 that swapped ported 92 to ported 102 and gained 10 rwhp 16 rwtq. Pm Ron and ask for sure. Thats what I remember them posting. Too lazy to go find it though.