Preliminary Dyno Results from LSX Intake - Courtesy of MTI!
#21
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nickn20
I think to be truly fair to FAST, on a motor like this is to use the 90mm TB version AND port match the intake to the intake port of the head, I am sure they need it!!! then get some numbers for us!
Jayson - MTI
#27
9 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MTI
That is in the works as we speak. We just wanted to see what the intake would do out of the box. We'll be posting #'s as things develop.
Jayson - MTI
Jayson - MTI
I had no doubts you guys would be doing this, I was just explaining to everyone else that was questioning the gains as weak..... a manifold can only do so much, when its being choked, here is a interesting idea see how much vaccum the motor pulled at WOT with the LS6 with stock TB in place then switch manifolds and measure vaccum again, ultimiately when you get to 0 vaccum you know you got a good intake and TB setup! IE no restrictions...... then if the HP is not there, then we can call it a flop or not, but from the results to far its definitely gonna be a good mod.
#34
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MONGOOSEWS7
if their was some way to change the electronics, the newer lightnings 99 to 04 have a 90mm mass air meter. so that would work out perfectly with a 90mm tb and lsx intake
#37
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by John B
Thanks Jayson.
Maybe GM already has and we don't know it.....anyone know if they changed the MAF to 90mm on the LS2 to match the 90mm Throttle Body?
Maybe GM already has and we don't know it.....anyone know if they changed the MAF to 90mm on the LS2 to match the 90mm Throttle Body?
#38
"All Motor 9 Second club member"
iTrader: (60)
I'd bet a H/C car , stock internal car and the big cube cars show a signifigant gain in actual ET numbers especially with an 85 mm or larger maf and a cold air kit that provides a positive pressure to the intake. I'll put money on that!
Thanks to MTI for providing the realistic research numbers. They have never been one to sugar coat #s and the customer is always satisfied. Kudos to you guys!!!
Thanks to MTI for providing the realistic research numbers. They have never been one to sugar coat #s and the customer is always satisfied. Kudos to you guys!!!
#40
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CANNIBAL
I really doubt the 85 MM MAF is gonna be that HUGE of a restriction is it? I know it's only a 5MM decrease but will it be something that measurable?