hooker vs pace vs macs
so did mine...i didnt say EVERYONE has to grind, i said someone did. Re Read my post. EVERY header has had someone post the same issues as the rest.
there is not a single header out there that hasnt caused someone to grind the block. Which btw is a 13 second mod. There is not a single header out there that has not caused someone to grind the K member. Which might i add is another 13 second mod. Dyno wise we all know the ls1/6 is a very non consistant motor as far as #'s go. LT should make more power.
Macs are nice mid length headers. They are not carb legal and these days you can get LT cheaper. Some LT (pacesetters) even have MORE ground clearance.
P R E F E R E N C E
But I have to disagree about all headers requiring a block grind. My pacesetters didn't!
I used a torch and a crowbar to "grind" my kmember. Just heated it until it was red-hot and then pry it back. It was quite easy and took about 10 minutes.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
And I can't speak for the Pacesetter Y because I didn't use it. But I do hear that it is lower quality than the headers... Like I said, go with true duals.
Here is a pic of the flowtechs, that Tony (nineball) took of them at the sema show.pic of Flowtech LT Headers
Here is a link to the group purchase, but its ended, but they discuss these headers in it.https://ls1tech.com/forums/sponsor-sales-specials/131216-new-affordable-lt-headers.html
But I have to disagree about all headers requiring a block grind. My pacesetters didn't!

I think what hes getting at is that there is going to be someone from each brand that is going to have to grind something for fitment. Not EVERYONE will but some people from all brands of headers. Im sure all headers from one company are not exactly equal in size shape etc....were talkin thousandths in measurments, but you know what i mean.
The O2 simms will only be used for the rear O2 sensors. The front ones MUST be connected using the extensions or the car wont run right.


just kidding. 

