Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

coolant crossover pipes

Old 03-06-2011, 07:17 PM
  #21  
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Paul Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,585
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

The original design of these engines had two coolant tubes per head. If GM could do without them they would not have used them.

I also trimmed off the ribs on my LS6 intake manifold when I installed it. I didn’t touch the coolant bleed lines-they’re all still there. The manifold fits just fine.

I would think that any work on these engines should not disturb or remove these lines. Any little bit of cooling and the purging of steam from both corners of the heads should be welcomed and retained.

As I don’t have a F.A.S.T intake, it would make sense to me that if it’s floor is thin, the heat from these tubes might affect it. However, I think it’s a stretch to think that these tubes will heat the incoming aircharge.
Old 03-06-2011, 08:34 PM
  #22  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,673
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts

Default

so wait if i were to swap to an ls6 or fast, than if i modify the bottum of the inake and take car of those clips like you said, than i do NOT need the coolant crossover?
Old 03-06-2011, 09:15 PM
  #23  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
jc98ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Floorman279
so wait if i were to swap to an ls6 or fast, than if i modify the bottum of the inake and take car of those clips like you said, than i do NOT need the coolant crossover?
you will definitely need a rear coolant crossover for a FAST intake, it won't clear, but for LS6 just bend the the stock coolant lines down and remove the knock sensor wire clips
Old 03-06-2011, 09:23 PM
  #24  
9 Second Club
 
Frozen WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Floorman279
Im talkin about the H shaped black Pipe that goes overtop of my 1998 ls1 intake. Is that A coolant related part?
That's your fuel lines, it's metal piping that goes to your injectors.
Old 03-06-2011, 09:24 PM
  #25  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (11)
 
southsidecox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Floorman279
Im talkin about the H shaped black Pipe that goes overtop of my 1998 ls1 intake. Is that A coolant related part?
uhh, no dude, i beleive your referring to the fuel rail,coolant crossover is underneath ls1 intakes,and ls6 is two seperate systems front and back of the intake(unless someone has modified them)

you prob. got confused because their both H-shaped(ls1 crossover)
Old 03-07-2011, 06:27 AM
  #26  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,673
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts

Default

Yea the whole h shaped confused me. So with the crossover tube, u r essentailly blocking the front two holes off right? Then just using the rears? Where does that rubber hose conne ct to on the gm crossover tube?
Old 03-07-2011, 07:51 AM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
trans_am7935's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Glen Burnie, MD
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Floorman279
Im talkin about the H shaped black Pipe that goes overtop of my 1998 ls1 intake. Is that A coolant related part?
oh you crack me up...i believe you are talking about the fuel line
Old 03-07-2011, 08:32 AM
  #28  
9 Second Club
 
Frozen WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Floorman279
Yea the whole h shaped confused me. So with the crossover tube, u r essentailly blocking the front two holes off right? Then just using the rears? Where does that rubber hose conne ct to on the gm crossover tube?
You want to have all 4 points vented. Do not block any of them off.
Old 03-07-2011, 10:22 AM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Shockwave179's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So what is the part number for the LS6 rear crossover tube?
Old 03-08-2011, 10:51 AM
  #30  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,673
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts

Default

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Corve...#ht_1423wt_749

check it out, not sure what the gm number is

see if i am going to a fast intake i do not have a choice of modifying. I have to get rid of the coolant lines underneath the intake. This is the pipe that i "NEED". it blocks off the front two with the clips, and only uses the rear coolant holes. you guys are saying not to block off the fronts but i dont have a choice with the fast.
Old 03-08-2011, 11:39 AM
  #31  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
kevin kuether's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fast gives you gm part numbers in the instructions for what crossover parts you need.
Old 03-08-2011, 03:51 PM
  #32  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,673
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Frozen WS6
You want to have all 4 points vented. Do not block any of them off.
I see how youre thinking that if they were not needed than gm wouldnt have had the front vent holes. But the coolant crossover that is made to run the other intakes is a "GM" part and with the part it blocks the two off. if it wasnt ok to do so, GM would have ever made the part. IT would be some knock off. So by going with that theory, it should be more than 100% ok to block the front two off
The following users liked this post:
cjruot (12-02-2019)
Old 03-08-2011, 04:05 PM
  #33  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (57)
 
99'CajunFirehawk157's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2,772
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Floorman279
So by going with that theory, it should be more than 100% ok to block the front two off
Thats a heck of a theory on someone else's engine!
Old 03-08-2011, 04:10 PM
  #34  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,673
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99'CajunFirehawk157
Thats a heck of a theory on someone else's engine!
all i meant by that is GM wouldnt make a part unless its without a doubt ok to go on a vehicle
Old 03-08-2011, 07:42 PM
  #35  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (57)
 
99'CajunFirehawk157's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2,772
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Floorman279
all i meant by that is GM wouldnt make a part unless its without a doubt ok to go on a vehicle
I understood what YOU meant, and I no gm expert here but if memory serves me GM made this kit so they could use up existing LS1 blocks before the LS6 block were introduced into the line or the first issue LS6 blocks had 4 holes and after a head design they found they only needed two? I would find some one knowledgeable about this part before I told someone to use it. I am positive GM never made this so people could use FAST intakes, they could car less about fast's parts.
What I think has happened over time is the people using FAST intakes are using these parts and its working, is that to say it may also cause someones engine to overheat and crack a head or block, maybe? who can say for certain. GM maybe? Maybe the OP needs to post a question specifically in regards to fast intakes and cooling lines in a separate thread?
Old 03-08-2011, 10:48 PM
  #36  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
thegroup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Archie, MO
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ive ran the rear block-offs for the last 3 years with no problems. my pistons looked good with no hot spots or anything of the sort and i put maybe 50 drag races on it last years. just my input

also, running a FAST 75mm
Old 03-08-2011, 10:49 PM
  #37  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,673
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts

Default

i no that they didnt make them for the fast intake lol. But since they used this part on BRAND NEW blocks like you said, if they had any doubts about it they wouldnt have used it. it may increase the chance of what you said, but even if it was remotely close to hurting anything, gm would have to repair anything that went wrong like overheating becasue it would be under a warranty, since it was used on a brand new vehicle. Am i wrong for thinking this?
Old 03-09-2011, 06:23 AM
  #38  
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Paul Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,585
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

What do these things have to do with the block? They attach to the heads.
Old 03-09-2011, 07:27 AM
  #39  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,673
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thegroup
ive ran the rear block-offs for the last 3 years
with no problems. my pistons looked good with no hot spots or anything of the sort and i put maybe 50 drag races on it last years. just my input

also, running a FAST 75mm
Wait the gm crosover blocks off the front two right? y did u choose to bock the rears off
Old 03-09-2011, 07:32 AM
  #40  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
thegroup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Archie, MO
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That's where I meant. The 2 block-offs the back and the ls6 tube on the front

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: coolant crossover pipes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 AM.