BBK or pacesetter headers
https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachmen...icture-065.jpg
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I got the chrome BBKs with the ORY for about 100 less than what he paid for the Pacesetters. After a few months of decent weather and regular driving they're starting to get that rainbow color if you look closely; at a glance they still look new. The installation was the easiest job I have seen or heard of.
I always thought ceramic coatings were more of a heat insulation measure than rust protection. I can attest that coated headers will still get rusty. In any case even the cheaper chrome plate on the BBKs will hold up better than no coating at all, which is what you get on the pacesetters. The black paint smokes right off and the bare metal rusts.
I would only recommend against the BBKs if you:
A. Have or plan to do engine work where the 1 3/4 primaries and 2 3/4 into 3 y-pipe may be a significant limitation
B. Need to have AIR, EGR or cats. (Not possible with the BBK without serious modification)
C. Drive your car in the elements.
i have made up my mind and am gonna go with bbks ceramic, solely for the heat insulation purposes.
my tuner told me that pacesetters is the better performance, but i am not willing to sacrifice quality for that, plus i think with bbks i am comfortable of installing the headers myself, which should save some costs.
cant wait for the ls6 intake and bbks installs then, i am off to get a retune!
Would you consider a D-1sc enough of a power adder to have the bbk headers become a restriction. The car is lowered so I like the fact the bbk headers tuck up better but I don't want to choke the flow too much
Last edited by Cstone812; Jul 28, 2011 at 01:25 PM.




