Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2 1/4" True Duals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2011, 10:13 AM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
PheonixLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2 1/4" True Duals

I have a TD setup with 2 1/4" piping. I don't race, so would it really be worth my time and money to have the shop go back and re-do it with 3" pipe?? Would it really be that much difference in HP.
Old 07-13-2011, 10:53 AM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Depends on your mods.

My car picked up between 15-20hp (based on ET/MPH) going from 2.25" to 3" and the sound alone was worth the change...much deeper and throatier now.
Old 07-13-2011, 11:01 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
PheonixLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mods are
LT's
SLP Lid
Ported TB
Hi-flow cats
TD w/ X-pipe
LM1 resonators
Quad 4" outlet resonated tips

Did it make it louder???
Old 07-13-2011, 11:04 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
omarrakeen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UAE, Dubai.
Posts: 2,475
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

it would make it louder, maybe a lil bit but it will for sure. if your going with future mods like a cam id say get it done now to 3 or at least 2.5 inch. good luck
Old 07-13-2011, 11:07 AM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
PheonixLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have thrown around the idea of a cam just because I love the way a cam sound. But I don't have the money or the time ( have 2 kids ) to buy the parts or do the install. So I probably will not be doing a cam.
Old 07-13-2011, 11:10 AM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Without a cam you might not need it, 2.25" duals should still be better than a y pipe. It would be louder with the larger pipe.

Likely better ways to spend money unless you can get it done cheap.
Old 07-13-2011, 11:17 AM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
PheonixLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Probably cost me $200 to have it redone
Old 07-13-2011, 10:37 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Fb0dy0nly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Detroit ROCK City
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

from the stickies my friends...
A 2.75” (stock) single system is good for a 310hp engine with zero loss…
A 3” Single system is good for a 370hp engine with zero loss…
A 3.5” Single system is good for a 503hp engine with zero loss…
A 4” Single system is good for a 657hp engine with zero loss…
A 2.25” dual system is good for a 457hp engine with zero loss…
A 2.5” dual system is good for a 513hp engine with zero loss…
A 3” dual system is good for a 812hp engine with zero loss…
Old 07-14-2011, 06:44 AM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
PheonixLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fb0dy0nly
from the stickies my friends...
A 2.75” (stock) single system is good for a 310hp engine with zero loss…
A 3” Single system is good for a 370hp engine with zero loss…
A 3.5” Single system is good for a 503hp engine with zero loss…
A 4” Single system is good for a 657hp engine with zero loss…
A 2.25” dual system is good for a 457hp engine with zero loss…
A 2.5” dual system is good for a 513hp engine with zero loss…
A 3” dual system is good for a 812hp engine with zero loss…
Is this RWHP or Crank HP??
Old 07-14-2011, 07:11 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
TImmy_Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Doesn't matter, a bolt on car is no where near 457 even at the crank.

If you're curious read the whole exhaust FAQ.
Old 07-14-2011, 07:15 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fb0dy0nly
from the stickies my friends...
A 2.75” (stock) single system is good for a 310hp engine with zero loss…
A 3” Single system is good for a 370hp engine with zero loss…
A 3.5” Single system is good for a 503hp engine with zero loss…
A 4” Single system is good for a 657hp engine with zero loss…
A 2.25” dual system is good for a 457hp engine with zero loss…
A 2.5” dual system is good for a 513hp engine with zero loss…
A 3” dual system is good for a 812hp engine with zero loss…
The data in the stickie is wrong.

The underlying information is taken from a 2005 magazine article. The magazine article assumes, counterfactually, that there is a linear relationship between pipe sizes and volumetric flow gas flow based on relative cross sectional area. The actual relationship between pipe sizes is far more complicated and is usually calculated using complex engineering formulas. Those complex calculations however, can be reduced for estimating purposes to an exponential relationship.

In the attachment below I have substituted the actual exponential relationships and recalulated the relative horsepower levels assuming that the lowest horsepower shown in the magazine article (310 horsepower) is measured.

In most case the corrected data will not lead to a different conclusion regarding which exhaust systems are appropriate. There are however, a couple instances where the miscalulations in the magazine article suggest more horsepower from an exhaust configuration that actually has a lower flow capacity.
Attached Thumbnails 2 1/4" True Duals-exhaust.jpg  
Old 07-14-2011, 08:08 AM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
PheonixLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darkman
The data in the stickie is wrong.

The underlying information is taken from a 2005 magazine article. The magazine article assumes, counterfactually, that there is a linear relationship between pipe sizes and volumetric flow gas flow based on relative cross sectional area. The actual relationship between pipe sizes is far more complicated and is usually calculated using complex engineering formulas. Those complex calculations however, can be reduced for estimating purposes to an exponential relationship.

In the attachment below I have substituted the actual exponential relationships and recalulated the relative horsepower levels assuming that the lowest horsepower shown in the magazine article (310 horsepower) is measured.

In most case the corrected data will not lead to a different conclusion regarding which exhaust systems are appropriate. There are however, a couple instances where the miscalulations in the magazine article suggest more horsepower from an exhaust configuration that actually has a lower flow capacity.
So, with this being said, I SHOULD go to 3" or am I still fine at 2 1/4"???
Old 07-14-2011, 08:09 AM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
PheonixLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TImmy_Jones
Doesn't matter, a bolt on car is no where near 457 even at the crank.

If you're curious read the whole exhaust FAQ.
I read most of it, but didn't really understand or find the exact "smack me in the face obvious" answer I was looking for.
Old 07-14-2011, 08:16 AM
  #14  
On The Tree
iTrader: (10)
 
AlamoTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After looking at both sets of data and your current mods. I say stick with what you have. In the future, maybe go with the 2.5" TDs, but no sense in throwing another $200 if your current system is good. You wont get much if any gains, with the exception of sound. Maybe a different sound is worth it to you. To each his own!
Old 07-14-2011, 08:29 AM
  #15  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
 
senicalj4579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,257
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PheonixLS1
Is this RWHP or Crank HP??
I go by engine hp. I say change it to bigger pipe so you can have it all set to work better with other mods in the future.
Old 07-14-2011, 09:08 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PheonixLS1
So, with this being said, I SHOULD go to 3" or am I still fine at 2 1/4"???
It depends on cost. If you can convert your existing 2 1/4-inch dual system to a 3-inch dual system for $200.00, I would do it. I suspect, but cannot prove, that you would gain some horsepower immediately, and you would be essentially done with the exhaust system if you add mods later since the dual-3 inch system would have more than twice the flow capacity of your existing system.
Old 07-14-2011, 10:05 AM
  #17  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

You aren't going to gain enough to feel, so if you don't race, it's not worth it unless you want the louder deeper sound.

And I don't really care what that info from the stickies said, I had 2 1/4" with dual cutouts, with them closed I lost ET/MPH and gained with them open (they are less than a foot behind the collectors). Now that I have 3" I do not gain anything by opening them.
Old 07-14-2011, 12:03 PM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Full-Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate of SC
Posts: 3,069
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

It will make a little more power for sure. If it only gained 1HP then we can trash these charts saying zero power loss. All this theoretical power vs. pipe size is rubbish IMO.

I say if it makes more power at all then go for it. I would rather have the comfort of knowing Im not leaving anything on the table with my exhaust.

just my 2 cents




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 AM.