Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Port/De-Screen Stock MAF?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2013, 03:40 AM
  #21  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (17)
 
HoLLo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 3,161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

+1 for the SaxonPC screen
Old 08-30-2013, 07:02 AM
  #22  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 426 Likes on 337 Posts

Default

I have never had a problem descreening either. I usually port them too.
Old 08-30-2013, 08:35 AM
  #23  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ws6man29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: fl
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by M4N14C
Just to clarify, I have an M6 car, so none of the A4 horror stories I hear. But is it worth it? I plan on getting a tune eventually, but after a few more mods (current mods in sig). Heard both sides of this story, and for now I'm thinking just to de-screen it. But with my mods and a stock tune, is porting it a bad idea?
If you want to toy with the car I would de screen the maf and replace the maf ends with a Granatelli or some after market maf ends.This will give you more airflow especially if you do an Slp box or intake.You would not need to change the whole unit untill you get over 500 rwhp then I would go with speed density tuning.
Old 08-30-2013, 08:51 AM
  #24  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,601
Received 1,744 Likes on 1,302 Posts

Default

I would like to see back to back dyno pulls or 1/4 mile runs with and without a screen in a MAF. I bet the difference is negligible, and if there is a gain, its likely from inaccurate airflow.
Old 08-30-2013, 12:50 PM
  #25  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ws6man29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: fl
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
I would like to see back to back dyno pulls or 1/4 mile runs with and without a screen in a MAF. I bet the difference is negligible, and if there is a gain, its likely from inaccurate airflow.
There definetally will not show a gain. But when you do the whole combo lid,maf ends,pp tb,smooth bellows,inatke it is the way to go because they all compliment their selves. Just doing 1 thing will not show a gain.So when these vendors state you will recieve a 10 rwhp gain the are full of s***
Old 08-30-2013, 01:12 PM
  #26  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 426 Likes on 337 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
I would like to see back to back dyno pulls or 1/4 mile runs with and without a screen in a MAF. I bet the difference is negligible, and if there is a gain, its likely from inaccurate airflow.
I used to pop people's screens out at the track for them. I have seen it pick them up to. 2 in the qtr. It works in cars other than fbodys to.
Old 12-27-2013, 12:17 PM
  #27  
Teching In
 
TJTALS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm thinking about getting a saxon screen. h/c ls1 (eventually), w/ls6 intake(ported mouth to accept 85mm tb), SLP lid and stock MAF ported to 85mm.

How thick of a screen should I get?
Old 12-27-2013, 05:05 PM
  #28  
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Paul Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,591
Received 49 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

I've seen posted many times that the stock LS1 MAF (with screen) is good for 450~500 HP. Personally, I'd want to "upgrade" it when approaching that level.

I had removed the screen on my otherwise stock LS1 Firebird-and issues arose. It developed a stumble and hesitation. I went back to a screened MAF and the problems disappeared.

Removing the screen allows the airflow to become turbulent at certain engine speeds and throttle angles. This causes the sensor to report inaccurate measurements to the PCM.

I for one will say to retain the screen.

I'm about to build my new engine complete with a FAST 92 intake manifold. I'll be upgrading to a (somewhat) matching ID MAF tube with a LS7 cartridge style five wire sensor. Saxon screening will be used.
Old 12-27-2013, 07:00 PM
  #29  
Teching In
 
TJTALS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a descreened MAF right now and it's fine. I had an extra I've honed to 85 for when the time is right. Just wandering what ratio would be best as far a Saxon screens go.
Old 12-27-2013, 11:10 PM
  #30  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
1BAD98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Gloucester, VA
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I didn't notice any difference at all when I descreened my MAF, switched to an SLP 85mm MAF and still made little to no difference LOL. So now I'm going speed density and doing away with it all together...
Old 12-28-2013, 05:38 PM
  #31  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,601
Received 1,744 Likes on 1,302 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I used to pop people's screens out at the track for them. I have seen it pick them up to. 2 in the qtr. It works in cars other than fbodys to.
And if by some miracle it did do that it probably was because it was reporting less airflow and leaned it out and added timing.
Old 12-28-2013, 07:28 PM
  #32  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 426 Likes on 337 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
And if by some miracle it did do that it probably was because it was reporting less airflow and leaned it out and added timing.
Ok...perfect. It went faster and that's all that mattered.
Old 12-28-2013, 08:41 PM
  #33  
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Paul Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,591
Received 49 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Ok...perfect. It went faster and that's all that mattered.
THAT^

And at WOT, air turbulence at the MAF is less of an issue.
Old 12-29-2013, 08:09 AM
  #34  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,601
Received 1,744 Likes on 1,302 Posts

Default

^brilliant logic! " it went faster that's all that matters".....I prefer to accurately know what my engine is doing. On a basically stock car does it matter, not much. But on a modified or power adder setup, no way would that be smart. My car is north of 700rwhp and I have a screen and it drives like stock, I attribute much of that to an accurate fuel and airflow model that isn't skewed.
Old 12-29-2013, 08:27 AM
  #35  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 426 Likes on 337 Posts

Default

Well I hope no one would go by your performance and try to follow your lead. You have a turbo'd 383 running 10.6 at 132..........not exactly exceptional.
Old 12-29-2013, 10:08 AM
  #36  
Teching In
 
TJTALS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So for $12, I think I'll get one anyway. My car is still a DD, I want as much drivability in town as possible. So..what size? Anyone? 6:1? 5:1?
Old 12-29-2013, 10:26 AM
  #37  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 426 Likes on 337 Posts

Default

I have no drivability issues w/o a screen. I really don't know what the big deal is about popping them out.
Old 12-29-2013, 10:41 AM
  #38  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
(SS)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That screen also add's protection from things getting sucked into the motor and causing catastrophic failure.A buddy of mine wish's he would've left his in after a piece of his nitrous kit got sucked into his motor destroying it.The screen would've caught everything.
Old 12-29-2013, 10:47 AM
  #39  
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Paul Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,591
Received 49 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

I think that it makes sense that the longer the tubes are the better it's ability to straighten the airflow.

I've ordered the 6:1 (3/4 inch) for my MAF housing.
Old 12-29-2013, 11:39 AM
  #40  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,601
Received 1,744 Likes on 1,302 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Well I hope no one would go by your performance and try to follow your lead. You have a turbo'd 383 running 10.6 at 132..........not exactly exceptional.
Roflmao....man you're an idiot. I bring in factual data and have logged back to back on cars with and without screens, and your response is about my full weight street car running 10's on low boost isn't impressive. I did that like a year ago on 8 psi driving to and from the track still with a/c getting 30mpg.

News flash, just cause a car picked up at the track doesn't mean it was done safely. You do what you want, but I prefer to keep my engines running for a long time and not risk damage which is why my stuffs been together for like 6 years with nothing but plugs and oil changes.


Quick Reply: Port/De-Screen Stock MAF?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 AM.