Ls1 coolant tubes
Lets go back in GM history. The early LS1s had the coolant tube that went to all 4 corners of the heads. A few years later, all production LS engines had the rears blocked off. Now we go to the most recent DI LS engine. It does not even have ports to bleed the air out in the heads. Seems like GM is doing that for a reason...
Lets go back in GM history. The early LS1s had the coolant tube that went to all 4 corners of the heads. A few years later, all production LS engines had the rears blocked off. Now we go to the most recent DI LS engine. It does not even have ports to bleed the air out in the heads. Seems like GM is doing that for a reason...
From what I understand it should work for a 92. This was the route I was going to take once I get my 92mm so I can't be 100% certain that it does work yet.
Like mentioned, they are blocked off on the LS7 and no issues there....
The attached above where the rears connected is no different than having them blocked
KRC makes a kit that has another line coming off it.
http://www.krcpower.com/
On one with a carb, where would that line run to.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Like mentioned, they are blocked off on the LS7 and no issues there....
The attached above where the rears connected is no different than having them blocked

On most vehicles, manufacturers pass hot coolant through the throttle body to heat it up. This is done so that the throttle body doesn't freeze up when it gets cold from condensation and freezing temperatures.
Fortunately, most of us don't live in the arctic. Most of the time, unless ambient temperatures are consistently extremely sub zero the heat from the engine bay itself is enough to keep the throttle body thawed. Since auto manufacturers have to design a vehicle to work in all conditions, this is something that's done to cover the design.
The problem here is that the throttle body can get extremely hot, especially in the summer. Hot enough to litterally burn you. Air passing through the scorching throttle body gets super heated. Often times, and dyno numbers and monitoring equipment will prove it, the hot throttle body can all but negate a cold air intake, keeping air temperatures entering the upper intake EXACTLY the same as the OEM intake.
KRC makes a kit that has another line coming off it.
http://www.krcpower.com/
On one with a carb, where would that line run to.
Last edited by L_Brown; Oct 18, 2013 at 04:23 PM.
I have seen no evidence to support the "steam" ports causing the #7 failures. If you search, you will see most failures are Nitrous applications.
Those of you saying it's not necessary and that the steam doesn't contribute to cylinder 7 ring land failures, ask yourself this: have you ever seen an LSX motor with all four corners vented that cracked the cylinder 7 ring land? And if you have, was it due to cylinder 7 getting too hot even with the steam port venting?
But that is for a fatory set up with no turbos or NO2.
But that is for a fatory set up with no turbos or NO2.
Those of you saying it's not necessary and that the steam doesn't contribute to cylinder 7 ring land failures, ask yourself this: have you ever seen an LSX motor with all four corners vented that cracked the cylinder 7 ring land? And if you have, was it due to cylinder 7 getting too hot even with the steam port venting?
GM put the rear steam ports in what..5 years and only in the early LS1 Corvette and F-body? Now here we are...11+ year later, LS engines in Corvette (505hp 7.0), GTO, F-body, CTSV, Trucks, SUVs and NONE....Nadda have factory equipped rear steam ports...
GM must have determined, they were not necessary.
We should do a poll....I would bet you would see a very high percentage of the folks here have the rear ports blocked off and no issues...
Forget whether or not GM used four corner, two corner or no corner coolant ports.
Don't you think that it's a good idea to add a little help to the heads by increasing how the coolant can flow out from the ends of the heads?
The cooler the heads can be kept, the better they perform. The LT1 engine had reverse cooling-it went to the heads first. And it worked.
Forget whether or not GM used four corner, two corner or no corner coolant ports.
Don't you think that it's a good idea to add a little help to the heads by increasing how the coolant can flow out from the ends of the heads?
The cooler the heads can be kept, the better they perform. The LT1 engine had reverse cooling-it went to the heads first. And it worked.
FWIW I have an aftermarket Autometer temp gauge hooked up back there and its always 180ish deg.










