FTR 98mm lid
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 20
From: Howell & Fenton MI
Exactly! And it makes sense when you break it all down. Just like exhaust flow for example: Maybe you throw on the biggest and best headers but now maybe your your y-pipe and/or catback become a restriction, now negating the potential of the better flowing headers.
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,292
Likes: 3,616
From: Central Cal.
Like when someone puts a nasty cam in an otherwise stock engine, when a much milder cam and better heads and intake does the same or more. We see this all the time here, huh? Have a good one, my friend!
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 20
From: Howell & Fenton MI
That's exactly right man. It applies in many areas. You have a good one as well!
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 20
From: Howell & Fenton MI
you can easily find the bottle neck by logging the MAP. If your KPA is lower then 99- 100 then you have a restriction in the intake side. On my setup, with the SLP lid and no MAF, KPA was 97. With the 98mm lid and no MAF, KPA is 99.
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 20
From: Howell & Fenton MI
Yep that will definitely tell you, I was just referring to a way for those of us who don't have a way to data log.
