Idle/Startup - TPS & IAC problems
I adjusted the TB blade to the point where it now starts on its own with no help from me. It still idles low for about 10 seconds, then catches and idles like normal. My problem is, I read IAC counts should be between 30-60 once at operating temp, but mine sits at 0 according to the scanner due to the RPM’s being higher. I can back the TB screw almost all the way out to the point where it won’t start without throttle, but all the readings stay the same once it idles.
I took a multimeter and tested the TPS plug (disconnected). Blue white has 0.009 and gray/black has 5.00. I saw later I should have checked it with it plugged into the TPS which I can do later today. Does this sound like a bad TPS sensor? Am I on the right track?
RPM at temp is 800-850
Desired RPM - 775
IAC - 0
KOEO
TPS (V) - 0.00
TPS % - 0
KOEO/WOT
TPS (V) - 0.00
TPS % - 99
KOER
TPS (V) - 0.00
TPS % - 0
KOER/WOT
TPS (V) - 0.00
TPS % - 99
It makes sense that IAC counts are at 0 if you currently have the blade open far enough for idle speed to rise above the commanded set point. I can't imagine why "desired RPM" would only be 775rpm in the first place. For reference, the stock idle speed for an M6 LS1 F-body was 800rpm - that's for a stock engine with a stock cam (auto trans was 650 in P/N, 550 in gear). If the cam is THAT huge, I can't imagine why the tuner wouldn't have bumped idle speed higher to eliminate some of the issues.
Sounds like the car runs pretty well after startup with your new idle speed of 800-850. So I would reset the TB blade to nearly closed, have the tune updated to command an idle speed of 850rpm, then check IAC counts (and, if needed, you can further adjust the TB blade until IAC counts fall in the 30-60 range once fully warm).
But there is no point in fighting the commanded/desired idle speed by way of the TB blade (which is what you seem to be doing currently). Use the PCM as intended, meaning tune/command a higher idle speed, and then let the IAC do its job.
But I wonder how it's able to idle at all with the TB fully closed (unless it has a bypass hole drilled in the blade like the stock TB). If there is an air source anywhere that's allowing idle speed to rise above the commanded set point, then you should certainly see a "0" for IAC count (meaning it's fully closed, trying to regain control of idle speed).
It makes sense that IAC counts are at 0 if you currently have the blade open far enough for idle speed to rise above the commanded set point. I can't imagine why "desired RPM" would only be 775rpm in the first place. For reference, the stock idle speed for an M6 LS1 F-body was 800rpm - that's for a stock engine with a stock cam (auto trans was 650 in P/N, 550 in gear). If the cam is THAT huge, I can't imagine why the tuner wouldn't have bumped idle speed higher to eliminate some of the issues.
Sounds like the car runs pretty well after startup with your new idle speed of 800-850. So I would reset the TB blade to nearly closed, have the tune updated to command an idle speed of 850rpm, then check IAC counts (and, if needed, you can further adjust the TB blade until IAC counts fall in the 30-60 range once fully warm).
But there is no point in fighting the commanded/desired idle speed by way of the TB blade (which is what you seem to be doing currently). Use the PCM as intended, meaning tune/command a higher idle speed, and then let the IAC do its job.
I just realized that I missed this sentence the first time around. If the IAC is not responding to elimination of airflow (meaning the closing off of the TB blade) then something is amiss besides just the low-set idle speed. Was TPS voltage showing 0.00 with it plugged in or unplugged? I'm guessing the former, as your data shows that TPS percentage values were still being displayed.
But I wonder how it's able to idle at all with the TB fully closed (unless it has a bypass hole drilled in the blade like the stock TB). If there is an air source anywhere that's allowing idle speed to rise above the commanded set point, then you should certainly see a "0" for IAC count (meaning it's fully closed, trying to regain control of idle speed).
TPS voltage was plugged in on all tests, and all the readings are from a Snap-On Solus scanner. The idle part has me baffled. I accidentally started and moved the car with the TPS unplugged and it started and idled the same. I have TB screw set so just one light tap of the throttle and it idles out fine. I’m picking up an ACDelco TPS just to try it and see what it does. I’ll also remove the intake tube and see if there is a hole drilled in it.
It also has a slight stumble from 0-WOT till about 1100 rpm and then it wraps up fine. I don’t really notice any driveability issues either. I was only starting to mess with the throttlebody screw to fix the idle issue at start up and that’s when I noticed the TPS sensor was at 0v. It does smell really rich, but it doesn't have cats.
I did the the original TPS sensor while on the car, and it all the numbers functioned correctly. Voltage was correct and moving the TB by hand, it all read correctly. Here is what I found:

https://youtube.com/shorts/YQAnKivV0ZY?feature=share
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
On a side note, looks like JB Weld was used to close up the other TB blade hole in the picture above. The existing hole looks larger than the one found in a stock TB blade (I think those are 5/32" from the factory, or the closest metric equivalent).
On a side note, looks like JB Weld was used to close up the other TB blade hole in the picture above. The existing hole looks larger than the one found in a stock TB blade (I think those are 5/32" from the factory, or the closest metric equivalent).
I'm with you on the idle surging and stalling though...that **** was annoying as hell in the early '00s when we first started camming these engines, at this point it's just nuts to have to live with that for a street car.
I'm with you on the idle surging and stalling though...that **** was annoying as hell in the early '00s when we first started camming these engines, at this point it's just nuts to have to live with that for a street car.

I'm with you on the idle surging and stalling though...that **** was annoying as hell in the early '00s when we first started camming these engines, at this point it's just nuts to have to live with that for a street car.











