Electronic 102mm TB?
Since the gold blade has a finer resolution, it opens farther than 100%, according to the PCM. So my tuner had to set the throttle opening to like 90% to keep it from going into reduced engine power mode. It still opens fully, as the blade isnt closed more the cross section of the shaft its mounted on, but the PCM is happier. I wonder if that is similar to the issues people see with the 102+ sizes. I am putting a Summit 102mm on my LS3 build so we'll see when dyno day comes if my tuner has issues.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I ended up having to switch the +5v reference and ground pins on the adapter harness for the TB to work.
On the dyno, the 102mm was worth +8hp over the stock LS3 90mm.
With the C6 and later, you can adjust the way that the PCM interprets the signals from the position sensors, so you can tune around the throttle body quirks with those PCMs. But if the throttle bodies were compatible, that wouldn't even be necessary.
And there's a mechanical aspect to it as well. The GM throttle bodies start flowing air when the blade moves just a tiny bit. I have a Katech 103mm (which I'm told is a rebranded NW) and it doesn't even start to flow any air at all until the blade has moved a LOT further. So at cold starts, the NW throttle body is just barely flowing enough air for my car to idle while it's telling the TAC that throttle blade is 18% open... And 18% is all the TAC will allow at idle. So cold starts are crap, especially in the winter.
I just got a widget from Torque Rush that will let me re-map the throttle blade angle sensor signal and I'm gonna play with that over the summer, I'm pretty sure it will fix my cold-start issues - and also the fact that the "reduced engine power" mode (where the TAC limits the blade angle to 25%) barely allows enough air for the car to move forward on level ground. I had to get towed off of a track last year because I couldn't make it back to the pits in REP mode.
With the C6 and later, you can adjust the way that the PCM interprets the signals from the position sensors, so you can tune around the throttle body quirks with those PCMs. But if the throttle bodies were compatible, that wouldn't even be necessary.
And there's a mechanical aspect to it as well. The GM throttle bodies start flowing air when the blade moves just a tiny bit. I have a Katech 103mm (which I'm told is a rebranded NW) and it doesn't even start to flow any air at all until the blade has moved a LOT further. So at cold starts, the NW throttle body is just barely flowing enough air for my car to idle while it's telling the TAC that throttle blade is 18% open... And 18% is all the TAC will allow at idle. So cold starts are crap, especially in the winter.
I just got a widget from Torque Rush that will let me re-map the throttle blade angle sensor signal and I'm gonna play with that over the summer, I'm pretty sure it will fix my cold-start issues - and also the fact that the "reduced engine power" mode (where the TAC limits the blade angle to 25%) barely allows enough air for the car to move forward on level ground. I had to get towed off of a track last year because I couldn't make it back to the pits in REP mode.














