Underdrive Pulley? which one?
10-30-2004, 01:30 AM
#22
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
What I meant was that we sould base our pulley choice on:
1- Harmonic absorbtion (the most important function) remember KR problems with ASP old design???
2- power
3- looks
4-weight (negligent as it is centrifugal weight)
1- Harmonic absorbtion (the most important function) remember KR problems with ASP old design???
2- power
3- looks
4-weight (negligent as it is centrifugal weight)
As far as weight goes, that is a concern of mine. The March supposedly weighs like 5 pounds more than the ASP and while it has little or no affect on the pulley's performance it is still extra weight on the nose of the car, considering that I take out my cigarette lighter for weight savings at the track you can just imagine how I feel about an extra 5 pounds.
*Just kidding about the lighter.
10-30-2004, 08:55 AM
#23
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Palos Hills, IL
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont know of any1's expreience with SLP since its NEW...jsut came out a few months back...looks like a suficient design...i eman it serves the same purpose as the rest...and they claim the same gains as the rest...it is a 25%...the only difference i see with it is the "all-steel construction and extra tall belt-retention walls" which im wondering if the walls will even make a difference and if so what kind of diffrence might i see? or notice compared to others in the aftermarket?
