Pacesetter vs. Hooker
Thread Starter
On The Tree
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: york, pa
Pacesetter vs. Hooker Ok, for a n/a WS-6 TA.. which headers do you prefer and why? Pacesetters or Hookers? Both ceramic coated. Don't know which way to go.. looking for both ease of installation and performance my buddy is saying hooker but I see a lot of you have Pacesetter. Tell me what ya think thanks guys
-New LS1 Owner
P.S. if you have pictures of undercar installs you have done I'd appreciate you posting them for me to see how the ground clearance is! Thanks
-New LS1 Owner
P.S. if you have pictures of undercar installs you have done I'd appreciate you posting them for me to see how the ground clearance is! Thanks
Ive installed both. Facts are as follows.
Hooker 5/16 flange Pacesetter 3/8 flange
Hooker o2 bungs outside Pacesetter o2 bungs inside
Hooker installs easy Pacesetter installs easier
Hooker I think is equal length
Hooker is more money but actually less header, Im mainly referring to the thicker flange of the Pace
They exit in same location and clearanceis about identical.
Hooker 5/16 flange Pacesetter 3/8 flange
Hooker o2 bungs outside Pacesetter o2 bungs inside
Hooker installs easy Pacesetter installs easier
Hooker I think is equal length
Hooker is more money but actually less header, Im mainly referring to the thicker flange of the Pace
They exit in same location and clearanceis about identical.
I have heard that the hookers are more difficult to install and it seems to me that anything less than QTP or Kooks headers and you should just go with pacesetters since they are largely considered the best bang for the buck.
