Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Effect of ported MAF ends

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 09:56 AM
  #1  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default Effect of ported MAF ends

This has been hashed before, but since I had some time, I did some live testing for Air Fuel Ratio and I thought I would share my info:

I have 2 MAFs
1- Stock MAF
2- Granatelli MAF

This is live with a wideband O2 reading both left/ right at same time.
Tune is rich for nitrous use.

So I thought I would swap ends from one to another etc...

Test 1- Stock MAF (screened)- BASE TEST-

Stoich-14.7
WOT- 12.6

Test 2- Stock MAF (de-screened)
Stoich-14.7
WOT-12.7

Test 3- Stock MAF (with ported granatelli ends)

Stoich 15.0
WOT-13.2

Test 4- Granatelli MAF (stock)
Stoich- 14.1
WOT- 12.0

Test 5- Granatelli MAF (stock GM divider ends)
Stoich- 13.7
WOT- 11.2

So, there are the results and effects of ported ends on AFRs
It is obvious that ported ends do lean out the mixture a lot (.3 stoich and .7 WOT from my base)

The funny thing is that with them on, it kinda took away the nitrous tune to give me an almost perfect NA tune

Also, a remark was mentionned on the board that eventually the PCM would learn and go back to the original setting and that is false (in my case at least).
I drove over 350 miles with the ends on and the readings never got richer. Once you fool the pcm, it stays fooled, since it never reads the un-metered air going in and my tune is in open loop.
I have an import with no O2 sensors (front or back).

Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; Feb 7, 2006 at 10:05 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 11:29 AM
  #2  
300bhp/ton's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 14
From: England
Default

So forgive my ignorance.

But surly if you have some form of tuning software (LS1edit, HPTuners) could you acheive exactly the same results via tuning but just sticking with the stock MAF?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #3  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Oh, yeah, of course. This wasn't done to tune the car, it was done just out of curiosity, to see the effect a simple MAF end change would have on the air fuel ratios.
since I had the Granatelli from long ago, I just used it for the tests.
Kinda like a myth buster test if you like

It just so happens that with my nitrous tune (rich at WOT), putting the ported ends on leaned my mixture just right.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 01:04 PM
  #4  
v8hunter's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
Default

What ratio is supposed to be best for reasonably safe WOT power?

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
This has been hashed before, but since I had some time, I did some live testing for Air Fuel Ratio and I thought I would share my info:

I have 2 MAFs
1- Stock MAF
2- Granatelli MAF

This is live with a wideband O2 reading both left/ right at same time.
Tune is rich for nitrous use.

So I thought I would swap ends from one to another etc...

Test 1- Stock MAF (screened)- BASE TEST-

Stoich-14.7
WOT- 12.6

Test 2- Stock MAF (de-screened)
Stoich-14.7
WOT-12.7

Test 3- Stock MAF (with ported granatelli ends)

Stoich 15.0
WOT-13.2

Test 4- Granatelli MAF (stock)
Stoich- 14.1
WOT- 12.0

Test 5- Granatelli MAF (stock GM divider ends)
Stoich- 13.7
WOT- 11.2

So, there are the results and effects of ported ends on AFRs
It is obvious that ported ends do lean out the mixture a lot (.3 stoich and .7 WOT from my base)

The funny thing is that with them on, it kinda took away the nitrous tune to give me an almost perfect NA tune

Also, a remark was mentionned on the board that eventually the PCM would learn and go back to the original setting and that is false (in my case at least).
I drove over 350 miles with the ends on and the readings never got richer. Once you fool the pcm, it stays fooled, since it never reads the un-metered air going in and my tune is in open loop.
I have an import with no O2 sensors (front or back).
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 01:47 PM
  #5  
felton316's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Default

Did you happen to log timing advance during these runs? I would be curious to see if it had different advancement because its reading a different airflow.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 05:48 PM
  #6  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by v8hunter
What ratio is supposed to be best for reasonably safe WOT power?
Well that depends on a few variables.
The main one being fuel octane, but includes advance timing and DCR.
I'm able to run very lean at wot with 14.1 on 26* timing and TR6 plugs gapped .035, before I start registering any knock, and that is because our fuel is 98 Octane. But best power is made around 13.2>13.5.
But with US gas, on 93 octane, 13.1>13.2 is the average norm with up to 28* timing.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 05:50 PM
  #7  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by felton316
Did you happen to log timing advance during these runs? I would be curious to see if it had different advancement because its reading a different airflow.
Actually no, not yet. I've been curious about the same thing too.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 PM.