headers
<small>[ September 13, 2002, 09:00 PM: Message edited by: JPWS6 ]</small>
If you look at the average gain at the track, you will see where Headers shine. My car went from running consistant 110mph in the quarter before headers, to running 112 plus... not to mention difference in ET of 12.07 to 11.95.
I will agree that the stock setup is MUCH better than most people give it credit for, but if you are looking make more HP, headers are good investment.
And in most cases the power gains from long tubes ARE worth it.
Trending Topics
I'm not running any cats since the kooks y-pipe and headers has no place for them and they do have two holes for the rear O2 sensors, should i get O2 sims and plug the wholes or should i put the rear O2 sensors in the wholes and everything will be fine?? i was reading from a different post that codes were set with the missing cats
Last edited by ZL1Killa; Nov 10, 2004 at 10:08 AM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
******Very good pricing I might add at SDPC on Kooks!******
Headers are a must IMO.
Headers are a must IMO.
Do you know what kind of gains (HP/RWT) you received from the mids?
Do you know what kind of gains (HP/RWT) you received from the mids?
on 315/35nittoDRs. So id say the gears & the macs help a bit. On my SS when it used to just a lid, K&n, Mac mids w/ catted hi-flow y-pipe and borla exhaust, Centerforce DF clutch, stock suspension, it ran a 13flat@109 w/ a 2.0 60ft on BFG 275/40 DRs but then my driving wasnt all that great. Anyway, what im tryin to say is Macs are pretty good!!!!




