MAC mids OR Pacesetters?
What do you guys think? I want the most HP increase. Thanks
If ground clearance is not an issure than get longtubes, the pacesetter long tubes have good clearance anyway, mine never hit anything.

But sometimes MACS are made out to sound like they make no power, when I have seen setups where they are on par with longtubes based on dyno readings. I guess it depends on entire exhaust setup.
Trending Topics
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-external-engine/487801-stainless-xs-supercomp-headers.html
A lot of people are watching this thread to see how these headers go on... AWESOME price for stainless.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
My Macs helped me knock a half second off my 1/4 mile time and put down 321 rwhp. If the long tubes aren't that much more than the Macs I would say go with the longtubes, they will give you slightly more power. Those ebay headers look like a real nice deal.
If youre gonna run true duals pacesetter would be better. Tsp makes a true dual kit that works with the pacesetters. No brainer
If youre gonna run true duals pacesetter would be better. Tsp makes a true dual kit that works with the pacesetters. No brainer
Dyno - Macs vs. Longtubes :
Rob (Bad30th)
Dyno - Macs vs. Longtubes :
Rob (Bad30th)
Like I said earlier, slight difference in power between the two. If you are lowered 2 " I would go with the MACS and not have to worry at all about hitting. 





